生物制剂和新型小分子治疗银屑病不良事件的风险- biobadaderm Registry。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
María Olivares-Guerrero, Esteban Daudén, Josep Riera-Monroig, Alicia González-Quesada, Antonio Sahuquillo-Torralba, Raquel Rivera-Díaz, José Manuel Carrascosa, Isabel Belinchón, Francisco José Gómez-García, Enrique Herrera-Acosta, Diana P. Ruiz-Genao, Ofelia Baniandrés-Rodríguez, Marta Ferrán, Pablo de la Cueva, Lourdes Rodríguez, Almudena Mateu, José Carlos Ruiz-Carrascosa, Mariano Ara-Martín, María Teresa Abalde-Pintos, Mónica Roncero-Riesco, Conrad Pujol-Marco, Carmen García-Donoso, Mar Llamas-Velasco, Elena Del Alcázar, Jorge Suárez-Pérez, Belén Rodríguez-Sánchez, Kevin Díez-Madueño, Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde, Victoria Lezcano-Biosca, Beatriz González-Sixto, Miguel Ángel Descalzo, Ignacio García-Doval
{"title":"生物制剂和新型小分子治疗银屑病不良事件的风险- biobadaderm Registry。","authors":"María Olivares-Guerrero,&nbsp;Esteban Daudén,&nbsp;Josep Riera-Monroig,&nbsp;Alicia González-Quesada,&nbsp;Antonio Sahuquillo-Torralba,&nbsp;Raquel Rivera-Díaz,&nbsp;José Manuel Carrascosa,&nbsp;Isabel Belinchón,&nbsp;Francisco José Gómez-García,&nbsp;Enrique Herrera-Acosta,&nbsp;Diana P. Ruiz-Genao,&nbsp;Ofelia Baniandrés-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Marta Ferrán,&nbsp;Pablo de la Cueva,&nbsp;Lourdes Rodríguez,&nbsp;Almudena Mateu,&nbsp;José Carlos Ruiz-Carrascosa,&nbsp;Mariano Ara-Martín,&nbsp;María Teresa Abalde-Pintos,&nbsp;Mónica Roncero-Riesco,&nbsp;Conrad Pujol-Marco,&nbsp;Carmen García-Donoso,&nbsp;Mar Llamas-Velasco,&nbsp;Elena Del Alcázar,&nbsp;Jorge Suárez-Pérez,&nbsp;Belén Rodríguez-Sánchez,&nbsp;Kevin Díez-Madueño,&nbsp;Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde,&nbsp;Victoria Lezcano-Biosca,&nbsp;Beatriz González-Sixto,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Descalzo,&nbsp;Ignacio García-Doval","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Registry studies are needed to provide comprehensive and updated assessments of the long-term safety profiles of systemic drugs in psoriasis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To analyse the safety of biologic drugs and new oral molecules used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients included in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events of Biological Therapy (BIOBADADERM), compared to that of adalimumab.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective, multicentre cohort of patients with psoriasis. The safety profiles of biologic agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab), apremilast and dimethyl fumarate were studied. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted IRR of specific adverse events were assessed for each drug, using adalimumab as a reference. Propensity scores were used to adjust for selection bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our study included 4212 patients (7590 treatment cycles; 17,284 patient-years of follow-up). Adalimumab had an incidence rate for all adverse events of 614 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] (591; 637)). The risk of all adverse events was significantly lower for guselkumab (adjusted IRR [aIRR] 0.56, 95% CI (0.47; 0.67)), risankizumab (aIRR 0.59, 95% CI (0.48; 0.71)), tildrakizumab [aIRR 0.6, 95% CI (0.46; 0.8)], ixekizumab (aIRR 0.65, 95% CI (0.56; 0.76)) and ustekinumab (aIRR 0.73 95% CI (0.65; 0.82)) compared to adalimumab (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002), as well as the risk for some specific organ-based groups of adverse events. Conversely, the risk for all adverse events was significantly higher for dimethyl fumarate (aIRR 3.67, 95% CI (2.71; 4.97)), infliximab (aIRR 1.88, 95% CI (1.45; 2.43)) (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002) and apremilast (aIRR 1.27, 95% CI (1.05; 1.53)) (<i>p</i> 0.012). The risk of malignant neoplasms was significantly reduced in the group treated with ixekizumab (aIRR 0.14 95% CI (0.04; 0.47)).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our data support that, overall, the new biologic treatments have a superior safety profile in real-world practice compared to adalimumab and its biosimilars.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"39 9","pages":"1643-1655"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of adverse events of psoriasis treatment with biologic agents and new small molecules—BIOBADADERM Registry\",\"authors\":\"María Olivares-Guerrero,&nbsp;Esteban Daudén,&nbsp;Josep Riera-Monroig,&nbsp;Alicia González-Quesada,&nbsp;Antonio Sahuquillo-Torralba,&nbsp;Raquel Rivera-Díaz,&nbsp;José Manuel Carrascosa,&nbsp;Isabel Belinchón,&nbsp;Francisco José Gómez-García,&nbsp;Enrique Herrera-Acosta,&nbsp;Diana P. Ruiz-Genao,&nbsp;Ofelia Baniandrés-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Marta Ferrán,&nbsp;Pablo de la Cueva,&nbsp;Lourdes Rodríguez,&nbsp;Almudena Mateu,&nbsp;José Carlos Ruiz-Carrascosa,&nbsp;Mariano Ara-Martín,&nbsp;María Teresa Abalde-Pintos,&nbsp;Mónica Roncero-Riesco,&nbsp;Conrad Pujol-Marco,&nbsp;Carmen García-Donoso,&nbsp;Mar Llamas-Velasco,&nbsp;Elena Del Alcázar,&nbsp;Jorge Suárez-Pérez,&nbsp;Belén Rodríguez-Sánchez,&nbsp;Kevin Díez-Madueño,&nbsp;Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde,&nbsp;Victoria Lezcano-Biosca,&nbsp;Beatriz González-Sixto,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Descalzo,&nbsp;Ignacio García-Doval\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jdv.20738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Registry studies are needed to provide comprehensive and updated assessments of the long-term safety profiles of systemic drugs in psoriasis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To analyse the safety of biologic drugs and new oral molecules used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients included in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events of Biological Therapy (BIOBADADERM), compared to that of adalimumab.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective, multicentre cohort of patients with psoriasis. The safety profiles of biologic agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab), apremilast and dimethyl fumarate were studied. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted IRR of specific adverse events were assessed for each drug, using adalimumab as a reference. Propensity scores were used to adjust for selection bias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study included 4212 patients (7590 treatment cycles; 17,284 patient-years of follow-up). Adalimumab had an incidence rate for all adverse events of 614 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] (591; 637)). The risk of all adverse events was significantly lower for guselkumab (adjusted IRR [aIRR] 0.56, 95% CI (0.47; 0.67)), risankizumab (aIRR 0.59, 95% CI (0.48; 0.71)), tildrakizumab [aIRR 0.6, 95% CI (0.46; 0.8)], ixekizumab (aIRR 0.65, 95% CI (0.56; 0.76)) and ustekinumab (aIRR 0.73 95% CI (0.65; 0.82)) compared to adalimumab (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002), as well as the risk for some specific organ-based groups of adverse events. Conversely, the risk for all adverse events was significantly higher for dimethyl fumarate (aIRR 3.67, 95% CI (2.71; 4.97)), infliximab (aIRR 1.88, 95% CI (1.45; 2.43)) (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002) and apremilast (aIRR 1.27, 95% CI (1.05; 1.53)) (<i>p</i> 0.012). The risk of malignant neoplasms was significantly reduced in the group treated with ixekizumab (aIRR 0.14 95% CI (0.04; 0.47)).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our data support that, overall, the new biologic treatments have a superior safety profile in real-world practice compared to adalimumab and its biosimilars.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"1643-1655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.20738\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.20738","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要进行注册研究,以提供全面和更新的系统性药物治疗牛皮癣的长期安全性评估。目的:与阿达木单抗相比,分析西班牙生物治疗不良事件登记处(BIOBADADERM)中用于治疗中重度牛皮癣患者的生物药物和新型口服分子的安全性。方法:对银屑病患者进行前瞻性多中心队列研究。研究了生物制剂(依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、certolizumab、ustekinumab、secukinumab、ixekizumab、brodalumab、guselkumab、risankizumab和tildrakizumab)、阿普雷米司特和富马酸二甲酯的安全性。以阿达木单抗为参考,评估每种药物的特异性不良事件发生率比(IRR)和调整后的IRR。倾向得分用于调整选择偏差。结果:我们的研究纳入了4212例患者(7590个治疗周期;随访17284例患者年)。阿达木单抗的所有不良事件发生率为614 / 1000患者-年(95%可信区间[CI] (591;637))。所有不良事件的风险显著低于古赛库单抗(调整IRR [aIRR] 0.56, 95% CI (0.47;0.67)),瑞尚单抗(aIRR 0.59, 95% CI (0.48;0.71)), tildrakizumab [aIRR 0.6, 95% CI (0.46;0.8), ixekizumab (aIRR 0.65, 95% CI (0.56;0.76))和ustekinumab (aIRR 0.73 95% CI (0.65;0.82))与阿达木单抗相比(p≤0.002),以及一些特定器官不良事件组的风险。相反,富马酸二甲酯组所有不良事件的风险明显更高(aIRR 3.67, 95% CI (2.71;4.97)),英夫利昔单抗(aIRR 1.88, 95% CI (1.45;2.43)) (p≤0.002)和阿普米司特(aIRR 1.27, 95% CI (1.05;1.53)) (p 0.012)。接受ixekizumab治疗的患者发生恶性肿瘤的风险显著降低(aIRR 0.14 95% CI (0.04;0.47))。结论:我们的数据支持,总体而言,与阿达木单抗及其生物类似药相比,新的生物治疗在实际实践中具有优越的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk of adverse events of psoriasis treatment with biologic agents and new small molecules—BIOBADADERM Registry

Risk of adverse events of psoriasis treatment with biologic agents and new small molecules—BIOBADADERM Registry

Background

Registry studies are needed to provide comprehensive and updated assessments of the long-term safety profiles of systemic drugs in psoriasis.

Objectives

To analyse the safety of biologic drugs and new oral molecules used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients included in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events of Biological Therapy (BIOBADADERM), compared to that of adalimumab.

Methods

Prospective, multicentre cohort of patients with psoriasis. The safety profiles of biologic agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab), apremilast and dimethyl fumarate were studied. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted IRR of specific adverse events were assessed for each drug, using adalimumab as a reference. Propensity scores were used to adjust for selection bias.

Results

Our study included 4212 patients (7590 treatment cycles; 17,284 patient-years of follow-up). Adalimumab had an incidence rate for all adverse events of 614 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] (591; 637)). The risk of all adverse events was significantly lower for guselkumab (adjusted IRR [aIRR] 0.56, 95% CI (0.47; 0.67)), risankizumab (aIRR 0.59, 95% CI (0.48; 0.71)), tildrakizumab [aIRR 0.6, 95% CI (0.46; 0.8)], ixekizumab (aIRR 0.65, 95% CI (0.56; 0.76)) and ustekinumab (aIRR 0.73 95% CI (0.65; 0.82)) compared to adalimumab (p ≤ 0.002), as well as the risk for some specific organ-based groups of adverse events. Conversely, the risk for all adverse events was significantly higher for dimethyl fumarate (aIRR 3.67, 95% CI (2.71; 4.97)), infliximab (aIRR 1.88, 95% CI (1.45; 2.43)) (p ≤ 0.002) and apremilast (aIRR 1.27, 95% CI (1.05; 1.53)) (p 0.012). The risk of malignant neoplasms was significantly reduced in the group treated with ixekizumab (aIRR 0.14 95% CI (0.04; 0.47)).

Conclusions

Our data support that, overall, the new biologic treatments have a superior safety profile in real-world practice compared to adalimumab and its biosimilars.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
874
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology. The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信