尼日利亚国家健康保险局及其对全民健康覆盖的影响。

D A Adewole
{"title":"尼日利亚国家健康保险局及其对全民健康覆盖的影响。","authors":"D A Adewole","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) of Nigeria was established in the year 2005. The overall objective of the scheme was to enhance access to quality healthcare for all and minimize catastrophic health expenditures. However, since inception, the population coverage has been less than ten percent of the total. Very recently, the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) of Nigeria was enacted, which concomitantly repealed the NHIS Act. This article examined the design of the NHIA and other factors outside of the scheme but in the health system of Nigeria, in comparison to similar schemes in other settings. Finally, the newly implemented NHIA and the gaps it seeks to fill were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant literature extracted from databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the ordinary Google website was reviewed. Findings from these sources were triangulated and used to write the manuscript.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with social health insurance schemes in other settings, the current population coverage under the NHIA of Nigeria is poor. Some of the factors that contributed to the poor performance of the NHIA were the features of the design of the scheme, which run contrary to the design of the majority of social health insurance schemes in other countries. In addition to this, the primary healthcare level that is most widespread in many countries and that was made use of as service providers in other social health insurance schemes was not made use of under the NHIA. In addition to these, and unlike in other settings, membership in the NHIA has been on a voluntary basis until very recently, when it was made mandatory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presently, population coverage under the NHIA is very poor. The informal sector, especially in rural settings, is mostly at a disadvantage. This is unlike in the majority of other countries, which encourage population coverage across both the formal and informal sectors. Stakeholders in the health insurance industry are encouraged to make the scheme mandatory and enforce it. The PHC facilities should also be engaged as service providers under the NHIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":72221,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","volume":"22 3","pages":"107-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE AUTHORITY OF NIGERIA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE.\",\"authors\":\"D A Adewole\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) of Nigeria was established in the year 2005. The overall objective of the scheme was to enhance access to quality healthcare for all and minimize catastrophic health expenditures. However, since inception, the population coverage has been less than ten percent of the total. Very recently, the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) of Nigeria was enacted, which concomitantly repealed the NHIS Act. This article examined the design of the NHIA and other factors outside of the scheme but in the health system of Nigeria, in comparison to similar schemes in other settings. Finally, the newly implemented NHIA and the gaps it seeks to fill were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant literature extracted from databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the ordinary Google website was reviewed. Findings from these sources were triangulated and used to write the manuscript.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with social health insurance schemes in other settings, the current population coverage under the NHIA of Nigeria is poor. Some of the factors that contributed to the poor performance of the NHIA were the features of the design of the scheme, which run contrary to the design of the majority of social health insurance schemes in other countries. In addition to this, the primary healthcare level that is most widespread in many countries and that was made use of as service providers in other social health insurance schemes was not made use of under the NHIA. In addition to these, and unlike in other settings, membership in the NHIA has been on a voluntary basis until very recently, when it was made mandatory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presently, population coverage under the NHIA is very poor. The informal sector, especially in rural settings, is mostly at a disadvantage. This is unlike in the majority of other countries, which encourage population coverage across both the formal and informal sectors. Stakeholders in the health insurance industry are encouraged to make the scheme mandatory and enforce it. The PHC facilities should also be engaged as service providers under the NHIA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"107-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尼日利亚国家健康保险计划(NHIS)于2005年建立。该计划的总体目标是增加所有人获得高质量医疗保健的机会,并尽量减少灾难性的医疗支出。然而,自成立以来,人口覆盖率一直不到总人口的10%。最近,尼日利亚成立了国家健康保险局(NHIA),同时废除了《国家健康保险局法》。本文研究了NHIA的设计以及该方案之外但在尼日利亚卫生系统中的其他因素,并与其他环境中的类似方案进行了比较。最后,对新实施的NHIA及其寻求填补的空白进行了审查。方法:从PubMed、谷歌Scholar、普通谷歌网站等数据库中提取相关文献进行综述。从这些来源得到的发现被三角化并用于撰写手稿。结果:与其他国家的社会健康保险制度相比,尼日利亚国家健康保险制度的人口覆盖率较低。造成全国健康保险计划表现不佳的一些因素是该计划的设计特点,这与其他国家大多数社会健康保险计划的设计背道而驰。此外,在许多国家最普遍的初级保健水平,在其他社会健康保险计划中被用作服务提供者,但在国家健康保险制度下没有得到利用。除此之外,与其他环境不同的是,NHIA的成员资格一直是自愿的,直到最近才成为强制性的。结论:目前我国国民健康保险的人口覆盖率很低。非正式部门,特别是在农村地区,大多处于不利地位。这与大多数其他国家不同,这些国家鼓励在正式和非正式部门覆盖人口。鼓励健康保险行业的利益相关者强制执行该计划。初级保健设施亦应作为服务提供者,参与“健康保障计划”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE AUTHORITY OF NIGERIA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE.

Background: The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) of Nigeria was established in the year 2005. The overall objective of the scheme was to enhance access to quality healthcare for all and minimize catastrophic health expenditures. However, since inception, the population coverage has been less than ten percent of the total. Very recently, the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) of Nigeria was enacted, which concomitantly repealed the NHIS Act. This article examined the design of the NHIA and other factors outside of the scheme but in the health system of Nigeria, in comparison to similar schemes in other settings. Finally, the newly implemented NHIA and the gaps it seeks to fill were examined.

Methods: Relevant literature extracted from databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the ordinary Google website was reviewed. Findings from these sources were triangulated and used to write the manuscript.

Results: Compared with social health insurance schemes in other settings, the current population coverage under the NHIA of Nigeria is poor. Some of the factors that contributed to the poor performance of the NHIA were the features of the design of the scheme, which run contrary to the design of the majority of social health insurance schemes in other countries. In addition to this, the primary healthcare level that is most widespread in many countries and that was made use of as service providers in other social health insurance schemes was not made use of under the NHIA. In addition to these, and unlike in other settings, membership in the NHIA has been on a voluntary basis until very recently, when it was made mandatory.

Conclusion: Presently, population coverage under the NHIA is very poor. The informal sector, especially in rural settings, is mostly at a disadvantage. This is unlike in the majority of other countries, which encourage population coverage across both the formal and informal sectors. Stakeholders in the health insurance industry are encouraged to make the scheme mandatory and enforce it. The PHC facilities should also be engaged as service providers under the NHIA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信