评价WHO六步手卫生技术的有效性:步骤遗漏和持续时间对微生物减少的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S506993
Arkadii Vodianyk, Volodymyr Shyrobokov, Vadym Poniatovskyi
{"title":"评价WHO六步手卫生技术的有效性:步骤遗漏和持续时间对微生物减少的影响。","authors":"Arkadii Vodianyk, Volodymyr Shyrobokov, Vadym Poniatovskyi","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S506993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization has proposed practical recommendations for hand hygiene, which include a six-step technique for hand washing and hand rubbing with antiseptic agents. Hand hygiene has become one of the five key elements of the patient safety program. However, adherence to all six steps of hygienic handrub among medical staff is quite low. In our study, we evaluated the effectiveness of reducing microbial load on the skin of hands depending on the number of steps performed and the duration of handrub.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preparation of the contamination fluid and the contamination of the volunteers' hand skin were carried out according to the European standard EN 1500. Subsequently handrub was performed using an alcohol-based antiseptic with various modifications of the six-step technique, either excluding certain elements or reducing the time spent on each step. After the handrub, swabs were performed, and the number of viable microorganisms in the obtained samples was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adherence to all stages of the WHO-recommended 6-step hand hygiene technique provided effective decontamination of hand skin. Using all six steps for 30 seconds resulted in a log reduction of microorganisms up to 2.82 (mean value of colony-forming unit (CFU) = 2.024×10<sup>3</sup> (95% confidence interval (CI) ±0.545×10<sup>3</sup>). Reducing the duration of antiseptic use from 30 to 15 seconds did not decrease the effectiveness of the antiseptic action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the conducted experimental studies, it can be concluded that following the WHO-recommended algorithm for hand hygiene significantly reduces the contamination of the skin surface with test cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1591-1600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Effectiveness of the WHO 6-Step Hand Hygiene Technique: Impact of Step Omission and Duration on Microbial Reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Arkadii Vodianyk, Volodymyr Shyrobokov, Vadym Poniatovskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S506993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization has proposed practical recommendations for hand hygiene, which include a six-step technique for hand washing and hand rubbing with antiseptic agents. Hand hygiene has become one of the five key elements of the patient safety program. However, adherence to all six steps of hygienic handrub among medical staff is quite low. In our study, we evaluated the effectiveness of reducing microbial load on the skin of hands depending on the number of steps performed and the duration of handrub.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preparation of the contamination fluid and the contamination of the volunteers' hand skin were carried out according to the European standard EN 1500. Subsequently handrub was performed using an alcohol-based antiseptic with various modifications of the six-step technique, either excluding certain elements or reducing the time spent on each step. After the handrub, swabs were performed, and the number of viable microorganisms in the obtained samples was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adherence to all stages of the WHO-recommended 6-step hand hygiene technique provided effective decontamination of hand skin. Using all six steps for 30 seconds resulted in a log reduction of microorganisms up to 2.82 (mean value of colony-forming unit (CFU) = 2.024×10<sup>3</sup> (95% confidence interval (CI) ±0.545×10<sup>3</sup>). Reducing the duration of antiseptic use from 30 to 15 seconds did not decrease the effectiveness of the antiseptic action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the conducted experimental studies, it can be concluded that following the WHO-recommended algorithm for hand hygiene significantly reduces the contamination of the skin surface with test cultures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1591-1600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S506993\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S506993","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:世界卫生组织提出了有关手部卫生的实用建议,其中包括洗手和用防腐剂搓手的六步技术。手部卫生已成为患者安全计划的五个关键要素之一。然而,医务人员对卫生洗手六步的遵守程度相当低。在我们的研究中,我们评估了减少手部皮肤微生物负荷的有效性,这取决于进行的步数和搓手的持续时间。方法:按照欧洲标准en1500进行污染液的制备和志愿者手部皮肤的污染。随后,使用基于酒精的杀菌剂对六步技术进行各种修改,或排除某些元素或减少每一步花费的时间。手擦后,进行拭子,并测定所得样品中活菌的数量。结果:遵守世卫组织推荐的所有阶段的6步手部卫生技术,可以有效地去除手部皮肤的污染。使用所有六个步骤30秒导致微生物的对数减少高达2.82(菌落形成单位(CFU)的平均值= 2.024×103(95%置信区间(CI)±0.545×103)。将抗菌剂的使用时间从30秒减少到15秒并不会降低抗菌剂作用的有效性。结论:根据已开展的实验研究,可以得出结论,遵循世卫组织推荐的手部卫生算法可显着减少皮肤表面受培养物的污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the WHO 6-Step Hand Hygiene Technique: Impact of Step Omission and Duration on Microbial Reduction.

Introduction: The World Health Organization has proposed practical recommendations for hand hygiene, which include a six-step technique for hand washing and hand rubbing with antiseptic agents. Hand hygiene has become one of the five key elements of the patient safety program. However, adherence to all six steps of hygienic handrub among medical staff is quite low. In our study, we evaluated the effectiveness of reducing microbial load on the skin of hands depending on the number of steps performed and the duration of handrub.

Methods: The preparation of the contamination fluid and the contamination of the volunteers' hand skin were carried out according to the European standard EN 1500. Subsequently handrub was performed using an alcohol-based antiseptic with various modifications of the six-step technique, either excluding certain elements or reducing the time spent on each step. After the handrub, swabs were performed, and the number of viable microorganisms in the obtained samples was determined.

Results: Adherence to all stages of the WHO-recommended 6-step hand hygiene technique provided effective decontamination of hand skin. Using all six steps for 30 seconds resulted in a log reduction of microorganisms up to 2.82 (mean value of colony-forming unit (CFU) = 2.024×103 (95% confidence interval (CI) ±0.545×103). Reducing the duration of antiseptic use from 30 to 15 seconds did not decrease the effectiveness of the antiseptic action.

Conclusion: Based on the conducted experimental studies, it can be concluded that following the WHO-recommended algorithm for hand hygiene significantly reduces the contamination of the skin surface with test cultures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信