Bethany J Frick Semmler, Allison Bean, Jamie B Boster
{"title":"语言病理学家对早期符号传播者的词汇选择和实施实践。","authors":"Bethany J Frick Semmler, Allison Bean, Jamie B Boster","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2025.2499510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vocabulary selection is a critical aspect of augmentative and alternative communication implementation, but there is no clear consensus on best practices in this area. Given that experience and training have been found to impact a range of practices within augmentative and alternative communication, this study aimed to understand the impact that experience and pre-service training in one country may have on vocabulary selection and implementation for early symbolic communicators who use augmentative and alternative communication through an online survey.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred seventy-six US speech-language pathologists with their certificate of clinical competence completed a survey exploring how they select and implement vocabulary training for early symbolic communicators.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The majority of speech-language pathologists (<i>n</i> = 172; 98%) reported that vocabulary selection is important and that caregivers should be involved with vocabulary selection (<i>n</i> = 169; 97%). The majority of speech-language pathologists use Just-In-Time programming (<i>n</i> = 112; 64%), modelling (164; 95.4%), and core vocabulary approaches (<i>n</i> = 150; 85.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Speech-language pathologists with more years of experience reported training teachers on Just-In-Time programming significantly more than those with less experience. Speech-language pathologists train stakeholders (i.e. caregivers, teachers, other support staff) in implementation strategies they are most comfortable with and train others more consistently as they gain experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech-language pathologists' vocabulary selection and implementation practices when working with early symbolic communicators who use augmentative and alternative communication.\",\"authors\":\"Bethany J Frick Semmler, Allison Bean, Jamie B Boster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17549507.2025.2499510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vocabulary selection is a critical aspect of augmentative and alternative communication implementation, but there is no clear consensus on best practices in this area. Given that experience and training have been found to impact a range of practices within augmentative and alternative communication, this study aimed to understand the impact that experience and pre-service training in one country may have on vocabulary selection and implementation for early symbolic communicators who use augmentative and alternative communication through an online survey.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred seventy-six US speech-language pathologists with their certificate of clinical competence completed a survey exploring how they select and implement vocabulary training for early symbolic communicators.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The majority of speech-language pathologists (<i>n</i> = 172; 98%) reported that vocabulary selection is important and that caregivers should be involved with vocabulary selection (<i>n</i> = 169; 97%). The majority of speech-language pathologists use Just-In-Time programming (<i>n</i> = 112; 64%), modelling (164; 95.4%), and core vocabulary approaches (<i>n</i> = 150; 85.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Speech-language pathologists with more years of experience reported training teachers on Just-In-Time programming significantly more than those with less experience. Speech-language pathologists train stakeholders (i.e. caregivers, teachers, other support staff) in implementation strategies they are most comfortable with and train others more consistently as they gain experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2499510\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2499510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Speech-language pathologists' vocabulary selection and implementation practices when working with early symbolic communicators who use augmentative and alternative communication.
Purpose: Vocabulary selection is a critical aspect of augmentative and alternative communication implementation, but there is no clear consensus on best practices in this area. Given that experience and training have been found to impact a range of practices within augmentative and alternative communication, this study aimed to understand the impact that experience and pre-service training in one country may have on vocabulary selection and implementation for early symbolic communicators who use augmentative and alternative communication through an online survey.
Method: One hundred seventy-six US speech-language pathologists with their certificate of clinical competence completed a survey exploring how they select and implement vocabulary training for early symbolic communicators.
Result: The majority of speech-language pathologists (n = 172; 98%) reported that vocabulary selection is important and that caregivers should be involved with vocabulary selection (n = 169; 97%). The majority of speech-language pathologists use Just-In-Time programming (n = 112; 64%), modelling (164; 95.4%), and core vocabulary approaches (n = 150; 85.7%).
Conclusion: Speech-language pathologists with more years of experience reported training teachers on Just-In-Time programming significantly more than those with less experience. Speech-language pathologists train stakeholders (i.e. caregivers, teachers, other support staff) in implementation strategies they are most comfortable with and train others more consistently as they gain experience.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.