护士麻醉师非技术技能结构化评估工具的心理测量学评估。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Martin Jarl, Cecilia Escher, Piotr Harbut, Helen Conte, Ulrica Nilsson
{"title":"护士麻醉师非技术技能结构化评估工具的心理测量学评估。","authors":"Martin Jarl, Cecilia Escher, Piotr Harbut, Helen Conte, Ulrica Nilsson","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07297-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-technical skills are the essential cognitive, social, and personal resources contributing to safe and efficient task performance. An assessment tool can facilitate the development and teaching of non-technical skills. The nurse anesthetist non-technical skills tool includes four categories and fifteen elements and is an adaptation of the existing tools for physician anesthetists and Danish nurse anesthetists. The ratings are on a five-step scale, with an option to select \"Not Relevant\". Since there doesn't exist an assessment tool for Swedish nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills, the aim of the study was to translate and adapt the assessment tool for nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills to a Swedish context and test its psychometric qualities among nurse anesthetists with experience in teaching nurse anesthetist students and junior nurse anesthetists in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective psychometric evaluation study, sixteen nurse anesthetists were recruited. They rated 12 video clips of simulated anesthesia scenarios after participating in a three-hour calibration workshop. Four weeks later, a test-retest was conducted, which included five video clips. Internal consistency, Interrater reliability, and test-retest reliability were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency showed acceptable results on the element level and Interrater reliability indicated good results. Retest reliability showed poor to moderate reliability. The use of \"Not Relevant\" varied significantly depending on the length of the video clip and the provider being rated. The raters considered the assessment tool suitable but initially challenging to use for rating non-technical skills among nurse anesthetists and articulate non-technical skills in anesthesia nursing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This initial testing of the Swedish nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills tool shows acceptable psychometric qualities and gives a foundation for future research. However, the rating \"Not Relevant\" poses challenges that need to be addressed. Nevertheless, the participants consider the assessment of non-technical skills in Swedish nurse anesthetists to be appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of a structured assessment tool for nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Jarl, Cecilia Escher, Piotr Harbut, Helen Conte, Ulrica Nilsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07297-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-technical skills are the essential cognitive, social, and personal resources contributing to safe and efficient task performance. An assessment tool can facilitate the development and teaching of non-technical skills. The nurse anesthetist non-technical skills tool includes four categories and fifteen elements and is an adaptation of the existing tools for physician anesthetists and Danish nurse anesthetists. The ratings are on a five-step scale, with an option to select \\\"Not Relevant\\\". Since there doesn't exist an assessment tool for Swedish nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills, the aim of the study was to translate and adapt the assessment tool for nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills to a Swedish context and test its psychometric qualities among nurse anesthetists with experience in teaching nurse anesthetist students and junior nurse anesthetists in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective psychometric evaluation study, sixteen nurse anesthetists were recruited. They rated 12 video clips of simulated anesthesia scenarios after participating in a three-hour calibration workshop. Four weeks later, a test-retest was conducted, which included five video clips. Internal consistency, Interrater reliability, and test-retest reliability were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency showed acceptable results on the element level and Interrater reliability indicated good results. Retest reliability showed poor to moderate reliability. The use of \\\"Not Relevant\\\" varied significantly depending on the length of the video clip and the provider being rated. The raters considered the assessment tool suitable but initially challenging to use for rating non-technical skills among nurse anesthetists and articulate non-technical skills in anesthesia nursing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This initial testing of the Swedish nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills tool shows acceptable psychometric qualities and gives a foundation for future research. However, the rating \\\"Not Relevant\\\" poses challenges that need to be addressed. Nevertheless, the participants consider the assessment of non-technical skills in Swedish nurse anesthetists to be appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07297-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07297-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非技术技能是必不可少的认知、社会和个人资源,有助于安全有效地完成任务。评估工具可以促进非技术技能的发展和教学。护士麻醉师非技术技能工具包括四类和十五个要素,是现有的麻醉师医师和丹麦护士麻醉师工具的改编。评分分为五个等级,并可选择“不相关”。由于没有瑞典麻醉师护士非技术技能的评估工具,本研究的目的是将麻醉师护士非技术技能的评估工具翻译并适应瑞典的环境,并在具有麻醉师学生教学经验的麻醉师护士和临床环境中的初级麻醉师护士中测试其心理测量质量。方法:对16名麻醉护士进行前瞻性心理测评研究。在参加了三个小时的校准研讨会后,他们对12个模拟麻醉场景的视频片段进行了评分。四周后,进行了一次重新测试,其中包括五个视频片段。检验了内部一致性、内部信度和重测信度。结果:内部一致性表明元素水平上的结果可以接受,内部信度表明结果良好。重测信度表现为差至中等信度。“不相关”的使用根据视频剪辑的长度和被评级的提供商而有很大差异。评分者认为评估工具是合适的,但最初用于评估麻醉护士的非技术技能和阐明麻醉护理中的非技术技能具有挑战性。结论:瑞典麻醉师护士非技术技能工具的初步测试显示出可接受的心理测量质量,并为未来的研究奠定了基础。然而,“不相关”的评级带来了需要解决的挑战。然而,参与者认为瑞典护士麻醉师的非技术技能评估是适当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric evaluation of a structured assessment tool for nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills.

Background: Non-technical skills are the essential cognitive, social, and personal resources contributing to safe and efficient task performance. An assessment tool can facilitate the development and teaching of non-technical skills. The nurse anesthetist non-technical skills tool includes four categories and fifteen elements and is an adaptation of the existing tools for physician anesthetists and Danish nurse anesthetists. The ratings are on a five-step scale, with an option to select "Not Relevant". Since there doesn't exist an assessment tool for Swedish nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills, the aim of the study was to translate and adapt the assessment tool for nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills to a Swedish context and test its psychometric qualities among nurse anesthetists with experience in teaching nurse anesthetist students and junior nurse anesthetists in clinical settings.

Methods: In this prospective psychometric evaluation study, sixteen nurse anesthetists were recruited. They rated 12 video clips of simulated anesthesia scenarios after participating in a three-hour calibration workshop. Four weeks later, a test-retest was conducted, which included five video clips. Internal consistency, Interrater reliability, and test-retest reliability were examined.

Results: Internal consistency showed acceptable results on the element level and Interrater reliability indicated good results. Retest reliability showed poor to moderate reliability. The use of "Not Relevant" varied significantly depending on the length of the video clip and the provider being rated. The raters considered the assessment tool suitable but initially challenging to use for rating non-technical skills among nurse anesthetists and articulate non-technical skills in anesthesia nursing.

Conclusions: This initial testing of the Swedish nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills tool shows acceptable psychometric qualities and gives a foundation for future research. However, the rating "Not Relevant" poses challenges that need to be addressed. Nevertheless, the participants consider the assessment of non-technical skills in Swedish nurse anesthetists to be appropriate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信