感染性心内膜炎患者使用全身PET扫描可能影响血管内装置患者的护理:来自一项比较回顾性队列研究的结果。

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361251336849
Jason Park, Kaitlyn Simpson, Megan Neils, James Riddell
{"title":"感染性心内膜炎患者使用全身PET扫描可能影响血管内装置患者的护理:来自一项比较回顾性队列研究的结果。","authors":"Jason Park, Kaitlyn Simpson, Megan Neils, James Riddell","doi":"10.1177/20499361251336849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (WBP) may be an important tool for the management of infective endocarditis (IE) by identifying areas of occult primary or metastatic infection. However, the optimal use of this study in patients with IE is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients who did and did not have WBP as part of their endocarditis management, and describe the impact that WBP has on the management of IE.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a protocolized chart review of hospitalized patients with suspected IE who were discussed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis team at a tertiary care center between June 2018 and January 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 427 patients, there were 114 patients (26.7%) in the WBP group and 313 patients (73.3%) in the non-WBP group. The WBP group was significantly more likely to have end-stage renal disease, intracardiac prostheses, and cardiac devices, while the non-WBP group was more likely to have flail leaflet or paravalvular abscesses. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, hospital readmission, or length of stay between the two cohorts. The WBP group was more likely to receive longer antibiotic courses and had higher rates of suppressive antibiotics following treatment courses (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The use of WBP directly affected management in 44.6% of those patients, especially when performed to evaluate intravascular prostheses and grafts. Changes in management included further workup, performance of a source control procedure, or a change in the antibiotic regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WBP plays an important role in identifying metastatic foci of infection and directly impacting the management of patients with confirmed or suspected endocarditis. Infected intravascular prostheses were effectively identified via WBP, and as a result, these patients were prescribed longer courses of antibiotics and suppressive antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20499361251336849"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of whole body PET scan in patients with infective endocarditis may impact care of those with intravascular devices: results from a comparative retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Park, Kaitlyn Simpson, Megan Neils, James Riddell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20499361251336849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (WBP) may be an important tool for the management of infective endocarditis (IE) by identifying areas of occult primary or metastatic infection. However, the optimal use of this study in patients with IE is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients who did and did not have WBP as part of their endocarditis management, and describe the impact that WBP has on the management of IE.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a protocolized chart review of hospitalized patients with suspected IE who were discussed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis team at a tertiary care center between June 2018 and January 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 427 patients, there were 114 patients (26.7%) in the WBP group and 313 patients (73.3%) in the non-WBP group. The WBP group was significantly more likely to have end-stage renal disease, intracardiac prostheses, and cardiac devices, while the non-WBP group was more likely to have flail leaflet or paravalvular abscesses. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, hospital readmission, or length of stay between the two cohorts. The WBP group was more likely to receive longer antibiotic courses and had higher rates of suppressive antibiotics following treatment courses (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The use of WBP directly affected management in 44.6% of those patients, especially when performed to evaluate intravascular prostheses and grafts. Changes in management included further workup, performance of a source control procedure, or a change in the antibiotic regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WBP plays an important role in identifying metastatic foci of infection and directly impacting the management of patients with confirmed or suspected endocarditis. Infected intravascular prostheses were effectively identified via WBP, and as a result, these patients were prescribed longer courses of antibiotics and suppressive antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20499361251336849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251336849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251336849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全身18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/CT (WBP)可能是一种重要的工具,用于管理感染性心内膜炎(IE),通过识别隐藏的原发或转移性感染区域。然而,这项研究在IE患者中的最佳应用尚不清楚。目的:比较将WBP作为心内膜炎治疗的一部分和未将WBP作为心内膜炎治疗的患者的临床特征和结果,并描述WBP对IE治疗的影响。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:我们对2018年6月至2022年1月期间由三级保健中心多学科心内膜炎小组讨论的疑似IE住院患者进行了协议化图表回顾。结果:427例患者中,WBP组114例(26.7%),非WBP组313例(73.3%)。WBP组更有可能出现终末期肾病、心内假体和心脏装置,而非WBP组更有可能出现连枷小叶或瓣旁脓肿。两组患者的死亡率、再入院率或住院时间没有统计学上的显著差异。WBP组更有可能接受更长的抗生素疗程,并且在疗程后有更高的抑制抗生素率(p结论:WBP在识别感染转移灶方面发挥重要作用,并直接影响确诊或疑似心内膜炎患者的治疗。感染的血管内假体通过WBP有效识别,因此,这些患者被开更长疗程的抗生素和抑制性抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of whole body PET scan in patients with infective endocarditis may impact care of those with intravascular devices: results from a comparative retrospective cohort study.

Background: Whole body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (WBP) may be an important tool for the management of infective endocarditis (IE) by identifying areas of occult primary or metastatic infection. However, the optimal use of this study in patients with IE is unknown.

Objectives: Compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients who did and did not have WBP as part of their endocarditis management, and describe the impact that WBP has on the management of IE.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: We performed a protocolized chart review of hospitalized patients with suspected IE who were discussed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis team at a tertiary care center between June 2018 and January 2022.

Results: Among 427 patients, there were 114 patients (26.7%) in the WBP group and 313 patients (73.3%) in the non-WBP group. The WBP group was significantly more likely to have end-stage renal disease, intracardiac prostheses, and cardiac devices, while the non-WBP group was more likely to have flail leaflet or paravalvular abscesses. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, hospital readmission, or length of stay between the two cohorts. The WBP group was more likely to receive longer antibiotic courses and had higher rates of suppressive antibiotics following treatment courses (p < 0.001). The use of WBP directly affected management in 44.6% of those patients, especially when performed to evaluate intravascular prostheses and grafts. Changes in management included further workup, performance of a source control procedure, or a change in the antibiotic regimen.

Conclusion: WBP plays an important role in identifying metastatic foci of infection and directly impacting the management of patients with confirmed or suspected endocarditis. Infected intravascular prostheses were effectively identified via WBP, and as a result, these patients were prescribed longer courses of antibiotics and suppressive antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信