犬原发性淋巴结淋巴瘤的诊断和分类:肿瘤病理工作组的共识。

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Michael O Childress, Anne Avery, Erica Behling-Kelly, Peter Bennett, Laura Brockley, Ryan Dickinson, Kelly Hughes, William C Kisseberth, Laura Marconato, Valeria Martini, Angela McCleary-Wheeler, Lucia Minoli, Peter Rowland, Shane Sills, Luca Aresu
{"title":"犬原发性淋巴结淋巴瘤的诊断和分类:肿瘤病理工作组的共识。","authors":"Michael O Childress, Anne Avery, Erica Behling-Kelly, Peter Bennett, Laura Brockley, Ryan Dickinson, Kelly Hughes, William C Kisseberth, Laura Marconato, Valeria Martini, Angela McCleary-Wheeler, Lucia Minoli, Peter Rowland, Shane Sills, Luca Aresu","doi":"10.1111/vco.13064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the primary objectives of the Oncology Pathology Working Group (OPWG) is for oncologists and pathologists to collaboratively generate consensus documents to standardise aspects of and provide guidelines for oncologic pathology in veterinary species. Consensus is established through critical review of the peer-reviewed literature relevant to a subgroup's particular focus. In this article, the authors provide a critical review of the current literature regarding methods for the diagnosis and classification of primary nodal lymphomas of dogs, including histopathology, cytopathology, immunophenotyping and assessment of molecular clonality. Knowledge gaps in the current literature and recommendations for future study are also reported. Major conclusions of this consensus include: (1) Histopathology with immunohistochemistry is required for complete diagnosis and classification of nodal lymphomas; (2) Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry are the most reliable methods of immunophenotyping lymphomas, though neither is clearly superior to the other; (3) Molecular clonality testing should not be used in favour of immunophenotyping assays for classifying lymphomas; and (4) The use of emerging molecular tests for diagnosing lymphomas in the absence of histopathologic, cytopathologic, or immunophenotypic disease characterisation should be restricted to investigational settings until their diagnostic validity and the clinical benefit they confer to patients are more thoroughly characterised. This document represents the opinions of the OPWG and the authors; it does not constitute a formal endorsement by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists or the Veterinary Cancer Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":23693,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis and Classification of Primary Nodal Lymphomas in Dogs: A Consensus of the Oncology-Pathology Working Group.\",\"authors\":\"Michael O Childress, Anne Avery, Erica Behling-Kelly, Peter Bennett, Laura Brockley, Ryan Dickinson, Kelly Hughes, William C Kisseberth, Laura Marconato, Valeria Martini, Angela McCleary-Wheeler, Lucia Minoli, Peter Rowland, Shane Sills, Luca Aresu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vco.13064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One of the primary objectives of the Oncology Pathology Working Group (OPWG) is for oncologists and pathologists to collaboratively generate consensus documents to standardise aspects of and provide guidelines for oncologic pathology in veterinary species. Consensus is established through critical review of the peer-reviewed literature relevant to a subgroup's particular focus. In this article, the authors provide a critical review of the current literature regarding methods for the diagnosis and classification of primary nodal lymphomas of dogs, including histopathology, cytopathology, immunophenotyping and assessment of molecular clonality. Knowledge gaps in the current literature and recommendations for future study are also reported. Major conclusions of this consensus include: (1) Histopathology with immunohistochemistry is required for complete diagnosis and classification of nodal lymphomas; (2) Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry are the most reliable methods of immunophenotyping lymphomas, though neither is clearly superior to the other; (3) Molecular clonality testing should not be used in favour of immunophenotyping assays for classifying lymphomas; and (4) The use of emerging molecular tests for diagnosing lymphomas in the absence of histopathologic, cytopathologic, or immunophenotypic disease characterisation should be restricted to investigational settings until their diagnostic validity and the clinical benefit they confer to patients are more thoroughly characterised. This document represents the opinions of the OPWG and the authors; it does not constitute a formal endorsement by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists or the Veterinary Cancer Society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.13064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.13064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤病理工作组(OPWG)的主要目标之一是肿瘤学家和病理学家合作生成共识文件,以标准化兽医物种的肿瘤病理方面并提供指导方针。共识是通过对与小组特定焦点相关的同行评议文献进行批判性审查而建立的。在这篇文章中,作者提供了一个重要的回顾,目前的文献关于犬原发性淋巴结淋巴瘤的诊断和分类方法,包括组织病理学,细胞病理学,免疫表型和分子克隆性评估。目前文献中的知识差距和对未来研究的建议也被报道。这一共识的主要结论包括:(1)淋巴结淋巴瘤的完整诊断和分类需要组织病理学和免疫组化;(2)免疫组织化学和流式细胞术是最可靠的淋巴瘤免疫表型分型方法,但两者均无明显优势;(3)分子克隆检测不应被用于淋巴瘤分类的免疫表型分析;(4)在缺乏组织病理学、细胞病理学或免疫表型疾病特征的情况下,使用新兴的分子检测来诊断淋巴瘤应仅限于研究环境,直到其诊断有效性和它们赋予患者的临床益处得到更彻底的表征。本文档代表OPWG和作者的观点;它并不构成美国兽医病理学家学院或兽医癌症协会的正式认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosis and Classification of Primary Nodal Lymphomas in Dogs: A Consensus of the Oncology-Pathology Working Group.

One of the primary objectives of the Oncology Pathology Working Group (OPWG) is for oncologists and pathologists to collaboratively generate consensus documents to standardise aspects of and provide guidelines for oncologic pathology in veterinary species. Consensus is established through critical review of the peer-reviewed literature relevant to a subgroup's particular focus. In this article, the authors provide a critical review of the current literature regarding methods for the diagnosis and classification of primary nodal lymphomas of dogs, including histopathology, cytopathology, immunophenotyping and assessment of molecular clonality. Knowledge gaps in the current literature and recommendations for future study are also reported. Major conclusions of this consensus include: (1) Histopathology with immunohistochemistry is required for complete diagnosis and classification of nodal lymphomas; (2) Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry are the most reliable methods of immunophenotyping lymphomas, though neither is clearly superior to the other; (3) Molecular clonality testing should not be used in favour of immunophenotyping assays for classifying lymphomas; and (4) The use of emerging molecular tests for diagnosing lymphomas in the absence of histopathologic, cytopathologic, or immunophenotypic disease characterisation should be restricted to investigational settings until their diagnostic validity and the clinical benefit they confer to patients are more thoroughly characterised. This document represents the opinions of the OPWG and the authors; it does not constitute a formal endorsement by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists or the Veterinary Cancer Society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary and comparative oncology
Veterinary and comparative oncology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
75
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary and Comparative Oncology (VCO) is an international, peer-reviewed journal integrating clinical and scientific information from a variety of related disciplines and from worldwide sources for all veterinary oncologists and cancer researchers concerned with aetiology, diagnosis and clinical course of cancer in domestic animals and its prevention. With the ultimate aim of diminishing suffering from cancer, the journal supports the transfer of knowledge in all aspects of veterinary oncology, from the application of new laboratory technology to cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis and therapy. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes solicited editorials, review articles, commentary, correspondence and abstracts from the published literature. Accordingly, studies describing laboratory work performed exclusively in purpose-bred domestic animals (e.g. dogs, cats, horses) will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信