Ashley E Iodence, Valentine D Verpaalen, Whitney D Hinson, Steven C Budsberg
{"title":"犬肘关节镜探查相关的医源性关节软骨损伤的评价。","authors":"Ashley E Iodence, Valentine D Verpaalen, Whitney D Hinson, Steven C Budsberg","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the incidence, extent, and distribution of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury (IACI) during canine elbow arthroscopy and to investigate the effect of arthroscope size on IACI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 72 elbows from fresh frozen large breed canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Elbows were alternately assigned to nine groups consisting of different combinations of arthroscope size (1.9, 2.4, 2.7 mm) and surgeon experience (novice, intermediate, advanced). Routine arthroscopic exploration of the elbow was performed. Number of obturator insertions and procedure time were recorded. Joints were disarticulated and stained with India ink. The incidence and total surface area of IACI were determined. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the effect of arthroscope size on IACI, procedure time, and number of obturator insertions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of IACI was 100% with a median affected surface area of 10.6 mm<sup>2</sup> (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.4-15.6). Median IACI was lowest for the 2.4 mm arthroscope, which was significantly less than the 2.7 mm arthroscope (p = .006). There were no significant differences in number of obturator insertions per arthroscope size (p = .96). Procedure time was significantly longer with the 1.9 mm than the 2.7 mm arthroscope (p = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine arthroscopic joint exploration resulted in IACI in 100% of elbows. The 2.4 mm arthroscope was associated with the lowest extent of IACI.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Surgeons should be aware that IACI occurs routinely during canine elbow arthroscopy. Further research is warranted to investigate clinical significance and to develop methods that minimize IACI during canine elbow arthroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury associated with arthroscopic exploration of the canine elbow.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley E Iodence, Valentine D Verpaalen, Whitney D Hinson, Steven C Budsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the incidence, extent, and distribution of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury (IACI) during canine elbow arthroscopy and to investigate the effect of arthroscope size on IACI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 72 elbows from fresh frozen large breed canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Elbows were alternately assigned to nine groups consisting of different combinations of arthroscope size (1.9, 2.4, 2.7 mm) and surgeon experience (novice, intermediate, advanced). Routine arthroscopic exploration of the elbow was performed. Number of obturator insertions and procedure time were recorded. Joints were disarticulated and stained with India ink. The incidence and total surface area of IACI were determined. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the effect of arthroscope size on IACI, procedure time, and number of obturator insertions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of IACI was 100% with a median affected surface area of 10.6 mm<sup>2</sup> (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.4-15.6). Median IACI was lowest for the 2.4 mm arthroscope, which was significantly less than the 2.7 mm arthroscope (p = .006). There were no significant differences in number of obturator insertions per arthroscope size (p = .96). Procedure time was significantly longer with the 1.9 mm than the 2.7 mm arthroscope (p = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine arthroscopic joint exploration resulted in IACI in 100% of elbows. The 2.4 mm arthroscope was associated with the lowest extent of IACI.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Surgeons should be aware that IACI occurs routinely during canine elbow arthroscopy. Further research is warranted to investigate clinical significance and to develop methods that minimize IACI during canine elbow arthroscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury associated with arthroscopic exploration of the canine elbow.
Objective: To quantify the incidence, extent, and distribution of iatrogenic articular cartilage injury (IACI) during canine elbow arthroscopy and to investigate the effect of arthroscope size on IACI.
Study design: Experimental study.
Sample population: A total of 72 elbows from fresh frozen large breed canine cadavers.
Methods: Elbows were alternately assigned to nine groups consisting of different combinations of arthroscope size (1.9, 2.4, 2.7 mm) and surgeon experience (novice, intermediate, advanced). Routine arthroscopic exploration of the elbow was performed. Number of obturator insertions and procedure time were recorded. Joints were disarticulated and stained with India ink. The incidence and total surface area of IACI were determined. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the effect of arthroscope size on IACI, procedure time, and number of obturator insertions.
Results: The incidence of IACI was 100% with a median affected surface area of 10.6 mm2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.4-15.6). Median IACI was lowest for the 2.4 mm arthroscope, which was significantly less than the 2.7 mm arthroscope (p = .006). There were no significant differences in number of obturator insertions per arthroscope size (p = .96). Procedure time was significantly longer with the 1.9 mm than the 2.7 mm arthroscope (p = .03).
Conclusion: Routine arthroscopic joint exploration resulted in IACI in 100% of elbows. The 2.4 mm arthroscope was associated with the lowest extent of IACI.
Clinical significance: Surgeons should be aware that IACI occurs routinely during canine elbow arthroscopy. Further research is warranted to investigate clinical significance and to develop methods that minimize IACI during canine elbow arthroscopy.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations.
It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.