维也纳急诊科结构质量标准。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Harald Herkner, Alexandra J Lipa, Philip Eisenburger, Wilhelm Behringer, Alexander Spiel, Sonja Mahrer, Moritz Haugk, Rainer Thell, Marie-Kathrin Breyer, Nicole Biber, Edith Doberer, Anna Kreil, Michael Schwameis
{"title":"维也纳急诊科结构质量标准。","authors":"Harald Herkner, Alexandra J Lipa, Philip Eisenburger, Wilhelm Behringer, Alexander Spiel, Sonja Mahrer, Moritz Haugk, Rainer Thell, Marie-Kathrin Breyer, Nicole Biber, Edith Doberer, Anna Kreil, Michael Schwameis","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the Austrian Association of Emergency Medicine proposed structural quality criteria for in-hospital emergency care in Austria. However, it has not yet been assessed how these criteria apply to existing emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All in-hospital emergency departments across Vienna were surveyed using a structured assessment based on published proposed structural quality criteria. A total of 54 criteria were analysed, each rated on a scale of 3 (comprehensive care), 2 (standard care), 1 (basic care), or 0 (not met).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16 hospitals, we identified 10 emergency departments. The scores ranged from 87 points (54%) to 151 points (95%). None of the departments met all structural quality criteria. Overall, across all emergency departments, 69% of the criteria aligned with comprehensive care, 7% with standard care and 3% with basic care, while 21% of the criteria were not met at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A set of proposed structural quality criteria for emergency departments could be quantitatively assessed. While the published criteria and the observed infrastructure are largely consistent, there is significant potential for improvement in both the definition of the criteria and the criteria per se. The extent to which these structural quality criteria are useful for assessing the classification of tiered care models requires further studies in different regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural quality criteria of emergency departments in Vienna.\",\"authors\":\"Harald Herkner, Alexandra J Lipa, Philip Eisenburger, Wilhelm Behringer, Alexander Spiel, Sonja Mahrer, Moritz Haugk, Rainer Thell, Marie-Kathrin Breyer, Nicole Biber, Edith Doberer, Anna Kreil, Michael Schwameis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the Austrian Association of Emergency Medicine proposed structural quality criteria for in-hospital emergency care in Austria. However, it has not yet been assessed how these criteria apply to existing emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All in-hospital emergency departments across Vienna were surveyed using a structured assessment based on published proposed structural quality criteria. A total of 54 criteria were analysed, each rated on a scale of 3 (comprehensive care), 2 (standard care), 1 (basic care), or 0 (not met).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16 hospitals, we identified 10 emergency departments. The scores ranged from 87 points (54%) to 151 points (95%). None of the departments met all structural quality criteria. Overall, across all emergency departments, 69% of the criteria aligned with comprehensive care, 7% with standard care and 3% with basic care, while 21% of the criteria were not met at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A set of proposed structural quality criteria for emergency departments could be quantitatively assessed. While the published criteria and the observed infrastructure are largely consistent, there is significant potential for improvement in both the definition of the criteria and the criteria per se. The extent to which these structural quality criteria are useful for assessing the classification of tiered care models requires further studies in different regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2020年,奥地利急诊医学协会提出了奥地利院内急诊护理的结构性质量标准。然而,尚未评估这些标准如何适用于现有的急诊科。方法:采用基于已公布的拟议结构质量标准的结构化评估对维也纳所有医院急诊科进行调查。总共分析了54项标准,每项标准按3(综合护理)、2(标准护理)、1(基本护理)或0(不符合)进行评分。结果:在16家医院中,我们确定了10个急诊科。得分从87分(54%)到151分(95%)不等。没有一个部门达到所有的结构质量标准。总体而言,在所有急诊科,69%的标准符合综合护理,7%符合标准护理,3%符合基本护理,而21%的标准根本不符合。结论:提出的一套急诊科结构质量标准可以定量评价。虽然公布的标准和观察到的基础设施在很大程度上是一致的,但在标准的定义和标准本身方面都有很大的改进潜力。这些结构质量标准在多大程度上对评估分层护理模式分类有用,需要在不同地区进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural quality criteria of emergency departments in Vienna.

Background: In 2020, the Austrian Association of Emergency Medicine proposed structural quality criteria for in-hospital emergency care in Austria. However, it has not yet been assessed how these criteria apply to existing emergency departments.

Methods: All in-hospital emergency departments across Vienna were surveyed using a structured assessment based on published proposed structural quality criteria. A total of 54 criteria were analysed, each rated on a scale of 3 (comprehensive care), 2 (standard care), 1 (basic care), or 0 (not met).

Results: Among 16 hospitals, we identified 10 emergency departments. The scores ranged from 87 points (54%) to 151 points (95%). None of the departments met all structural quality criteria. Overall, across all emergency departments, 69% of the criteria aligned with comprehensive care, 7% with standard care and 3% with basic care, while 21% of the criteria were not met at all.

Conclusions: A set of proposed structural quality criteria for emergency departments could be quantitatively assessed. While the published criteria and the observed infrastructure are largely consistent, there is significant potential for improvement in both the definition of the criteria and the criteria per se. The extent to which these structural quality criteria are useful for assessing the classification of tiered care models requires further studies in different regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信