Harald Herkner, Alexandra J Lipa, Philip Eisenburger, Wilhelm Behringer, Alexander Spiel, Sonja Mahrer, Moritz Haugk, Rainer Thell, Marie-Kathrin Breyer, Nicole Biber, Edith Doberer, Anna Kreil, Michael Schwameis
{"title":"维也纳急诊科结构质量标准。","authors":"Harald Herkner, Alexandra J Lipa, Philip Eisenburger, Wilhelm Behringer, Alexander Spiel, Sonja Mahrer, Moritz Haugk, Rainer Thell, Marie-Kathrin Breyer, Nicole Biber, Edith Doberer, Anna Kreil, Michael Schwameis","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the Austrian Association of Emergency Medicine proposed structural quality criteria for in-hospital emergency care in Austria. However, it has not yet been assessed how these criteria apply to existing emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All in-hospital emergency departments across Vienna were surveyed using a structured assessment based on published proposed structural quality criteria. A total of 54 criteria were analysed, each rated on a scale of 3 (comprehensive care), 2 (standard care), 1 (basic care), or 0 (not met).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16 hospitals, we identified 10 emergency departments. The scores ranged from 87 points (54%) to 151 points (95%). None of the departments met all structural quality criteria. Overall, across all emergency departments, 69% of the criteria aligned with comprehensive care, 7% with standard care and 3% with basic care, while 21% of the criteria were not met at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A set of proposed structural quality criteria for emergency departments could be quantitatively assessed. While the published criteria and the observed infrastructure are largely consistent, there is significant potential for improvement in both the definition of the criteria and the criteria per se. The extent to which these structural quality criteria are useful for assessing the classification of tiered care models requires further studies in different regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural quality criteria of emergency departments in Vienna.\",\"authors\":\"Harald Herkner, Alexandra J Lipa, Philip Eisenburger, Wilhelm Behringer, Alexander Spiel, Sonja Mahrer, Moritz Haugk, Rainer Thell, Marie-Kathrin Breyer, Nicole Biber, Edith Doberer, Anna Kreil, Michael Schwameis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the Austrian Association of Emergency Medicine proposed structural quality criteria for in-hospital emergency care in Austria. However, it has not yet been assessed how these criteria apply to existing emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All in-hospital emergency departments across Vienna were surveyed using a structured assessment based on published proposed structural quality criteria. A total of 54 criteria were analysed, each rated on a scale of 3 (comprehensive care), 2 (standard care), 1 (basic care), or 0 (not met).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16 hospitals, we identified 10 emergency departments. The scores ranged from 87 points (54%) to 151 points (95%). None of the departments met all structural quality criteria. Overall, across all emergency departments, 69% of the criteria aligned with comprehensive care, 7% with standard care and 3% with basic care, while 21% of the criteria were not met at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A set of proposed structural quality criteria for emergency departments could be quantitatively assessed. While the published criteria and the observed infrastructure are largely consistent, there is significant potential for improvement in both the definition of the criteria and the criteria per se. The extent to which these structural quality criteria are useful for assessing the classification of tiered care models requires further studies in different regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02541-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural quality criteria of emergency departments in Vienna.
Background: In 2020, the Austrian Association of Emergency Medicine proposed structural quality criteria for in-hospital emergency care in Austria. However, it has not yet been assessed how these criteria apply to existing emergency departments.
Methods: All in-hospital emergency departments across Vienna were surveyed using a structured assessment based on published proposed structural quality criteria. A total of 54 criteria were analysed, each rated on a scale of 3 (comprehensive care), 2 (standard care), 1 (basic care), or 0 (not met).
Results: Among 16 hospitals, we identified 10 emergency departments. The scores ranged from 87 points (54%) to 151 points (95%). None of the departments met all structural quality criteria. Overall, across all emergency departments, 69% of the criteria aligned with comprehensive care, 7% with standard care and 3% with basic care, while 21% of the criteria were not met at all.
Conclusions: A set of proposed structural quality criteria for emergency departments could be quantitatively assessed. While the published criteria and the observed infrastructure are largely consistent, there is significant potential for improvement in both the definition of the criteria and the criteria per se. The extent to which these structural quality criteria are useful for assessing the classification of tiered care models requires further studies in different regions.
期刊介绍:
The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.