超声定量血流成像中模拟血液流体的表征。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Lizbeth Ayala-Dominguez, Cristel Baiu, Laura Castaneda-Martinez, Raul Esquivel-Sirvent, Mehdi Zeighami Salimabad, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez
{"title":"超声定量血流成像中模拟血液流体的表征。","authors":"Lizbeth Ayala-Dominguez, Cristel Baiu, Laura Castaneda-Martinez, Raul Esquivel-Sirvent, Mehdi Zeighami Salimabad, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at characterizing blood-mimicking fluids (BMFs), focusing on properties relevant to standardizing quantitative imaging biomarkers in vascular and microvascular ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three BMF formulations (BMFs 1-3) were prepared following the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)-61685 standard, varying in dynamic viscosity and particle buoyancy. A novel figure of merit (FOM) assessed particle buoyancy over time. Density, dynamic viscosity, speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter coefficient (BSC) were measured for unfiltered and filtered BMFs and compared to IEC-61685 reference values. BMFs were evaluated using power Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in a calibrated custom-made microflow phantom at 5 and 20 mm/s, using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a performance metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FOM accurately tracked particle distribution and enabled obtaining neutrally buoyant BMFs. Filtration significantly impacted BSC (p < 0.05) but did not affect other properties. BMF 2 matched all the IEC-61685 reference values (p > 0.05). BMF 1 exhibited the lowest dynamic viscosity, while BMF 3 had the highest BSC. BMF 2 yielded the highest CNR at 5 mm/s in both imaging modes. At 20 mm/s, BMF 3 yielded the highest CNR in power Doppler imaging, while all BMFs performed similarly in CEUS. BMF 2 provided similar CNRs across flow velocities in both imaging modes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive methodology for BMF preparation and characterization was developed, which enabled identifying a formulation that aligned with the IEC-61685 standard. This methodology could establish a foundation for developing reproducible and well-characterized BMFs, facilitating the advance of quantitative flow imaging techniques with ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of Blood-Mimicking Fluids for Quantitative Flow Imaging with Ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Lizbeth Ayala-Dominguez, Cristel Baiu, Laura Castaneda-Martinez, Raul Esquivel-Sirvent, Mehdi Zeighami Salimabad, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at characterizing blood-mimicking fluids (BMFs), focusing on properties relevant to standardizing quantitative imaging biomarkers in vascular and microvascular ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three BMF formulations (BMFs 1-3) were prepared following the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)-61685 standard, varying in dynamic viscosity and particle buoyancy. A novel figure of merit (FOM) assessed particle buoyancy over time. Density, dynamic viscosity, speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter coefficient (BSC) were measured for unfiltered and filtered BMFs and compared to IEC-61685 reference values. BMFs were evaluated using power Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in a calibrated custom-made microflow phantom at 5 and 20 mm/s, using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a performance metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FOM accurately tracked particle distribution and enabled obtaining neutrally buoyant BMFs. Filtration significantly impacted BSC (p < 0.05) but did not affect other properties. BMF 2 matched all the IEC-61685 reference values (p > 0.05). BMF 1 exhibited the lowest dynamic viscosity, while BMF 3 had the highest BSC. BMF 2 yielded the highest CNR at 5 mm/s in both imaging modes. At 20 mm/s, BMF 3 yielded the highest CNR in power Doppler imaging, while all BMFs performed similarly in CEUS. BMF 2 provided similar CNRs across flow velocities in both imaging modes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive methodology for BMF preparation and characterization was developed, which enabled identifying a formulation that aligned with the IEC-61685 standard. This methodology could establish a foundation for developing reproducible and well-characterized BMFs, facilitating the advance of quantitative flow imaging techniques with ultrasound.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在表征模拟血液液体(BMFs),重点研究与标准化血管和微血管超声定量成像生物标志物相关的特性。方法:根据国际电工委员会(IEC)-61685标准制备三种BMF配方(BMFs 1-3),其动态粘度和颗粒浮力不同。一种新的价值值(FOM)评估了粒子随时间的浮力。测量了未过滤和过滤bmf的密度、动态粘度、声速、衰减和后向散射系数(BSC),并与IEC-61685参考值进行了比较。使用功率多普勒和对比增强超声(CEUS)在校准的定制微流模体中以5和20 mm/s的速度评估bmf,并使用对比噪声比(CNR)作为性能指标。结果:FOM准确地跟踪了颗粒分布,使中性浮力BMFs得以实现。过滤对BSC有显著影响(p < 0.05),但对其他性能没有影响。BMF 2与所有IEC-61685参考值匹配(p < 0.05)。bmf1的动态粘度最低,bmf3的BSC最高。bmf2在两种成像模式下均以5 mm/s的速度获得最高的CNR。在20 mm/s时,bmf3在功率多普勒成像中产生最高的CNR,而所有BMF在超声造影中的表现相似。在两种成像模式下,bmf2在不同流速下提供了相似的cnr。结论:开发了BMF制备和表征的综合方法,使确定符合IEC-61685标准的配方成为可能。该方法可以为开发可重复性和良好表征的BMFs奠定基础,促进超声定量血流成像技术的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of Blood-Mimicking Fluids for Quantitative Flow Imaging with Ultrasound.

Objective: This study aimed at characterizing blood-mimicking fluids (BMFs), focusing on properties relevant to standardizing quantitative imaging biomarkers in vascular and microvascular ultrasound.

Methods: Three BMF formulations (BMFs 1-3) were prepared following the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)-61685 standard, varying in dynamic viscosity and particle buoyancy. A novel figure of merit (FOM) assessed particle buoyancy over time. Density, dynamic viscosity, speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter coefficient (BSC) were measured for unfiltered and filtered BMFs and compared to IEC-61685 reference values. BMFs were evaluated using power Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in a calibrated custom-made microflow phantom at 5 and 20 mm/s, using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a performance metric.

Results: The FOM accurately tracked particle distribution and enabled obtaining neutrally buoyant BMFs. Filtration significantly impacted BSC (p < 0.05) but did not affect other properties. BMF 2 matched all the IEC-61685 reference values (p > 0.05). BMF 1 exhibited the lowest dynamic viscosity, while BMF 3 had the highest BSC. BMF 2 yielded the highest CNR at 5 mm/s in both imaging modes. At 20 mm/s, BMF 3 yielded the highest CNR in power Doppler imaging, while all BMFs performed similarly in CEUS. BMF 2 provided similar CNRs across flow velocities in both imaging modes.

Conclusion: A comprehensive methodology for BMF preparation and characterization was developed, which enabled identifying a formulation that aligned with the IEC-61685 standard. This methodology could establish a foundation for developing reproducible and well-characterized BMFs, facilitating the advance of quantitative flow imaging techniques with ultrasound.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信