Lizbeth Ayala-Dominguez, Cristel Baiu, Laura Castaneda-Martinez, Raul Esquivel-Sirvent, Mehdi Zeighami Salimabad, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez
{"title":"超声定量血流成像中模拟血液流体的表征。","authors":"Lizbeth Ayala-Dominguez, Cristel Baiu, Laura Castaneda-Martinez, Raul Esquivel-Sirvent, Mehdi Zeighami Salimabad, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at characterizing blood-mimicking fluids (BMFs), focusing on properties relevant to standardizing quantitative imaging biomarkers in vascular and microvascular ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three BMF formulations (BMFs 1-3) were prepared following the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)-61685 standard, varying in dynamic viscosity and particle buoyancy. A novel figure of merit (FOM) assessed particle buoyancy over time. Density, dynamic viscosity, speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter coefficient (BSC) were measured for unfiltered and filtered BMFs and compared to IEC-61685 reference values. BMFs were evaluated using power Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in a calibrated custom-made microflow phantom at 5 and 20 mm/s, using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a performance metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FOM accurately tracked particle distribution and enabled obtaining neutrally buoyant BMFs. Filtration significantly impacted BSC (p < 0.05) but did not affect other properties. BMF 2 matched all the IEC-61685 reference values (p > 0.05). BMF 1 exhibited the lowest dynamic viscosity, while BMF 3 had the highest BSC. BMF 2 yielded the highest CNR at 5 mm/s in both imaging modes. At 20 mm/s, BMF 3 yielded the highest CNR in power Doppler imaging, while all BMFs performed similarly in CEUS. BMF 2 provided similar CNRs across flow velocities in both imaging modes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive methodology for BMF preparation and characterization was developed, which enabled identifying a formulation that aligned with the IEC-61685 standard. This methodology could establish a foundation for developing reproducible and well-characterized BMFs, facilitating the advance of quantitative flow imaging techniques with ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of Blood-Mimicking Fluids for Quantitative Flow Imaging with Ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Lizbeth Ayala-Dominguez, Cristel Baiu, Laura Castaneda-Martinez, Raul Esquivel-Sirvent, Mehdi Zeighami Salimabad, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at characterizing blood-mimicking fluids (BMFs), focusing on properties relevant to standardizing quantitative imaging biomarkers in vascular and microvascular ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three BMF formulations (BMFs 1-3) were prepared following the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)-61685 standard, varying in dynamic viscosity and particle buoyancy. A novel figure of merit (FOM) assessed particle buoyancy over time. Density, dynamic viscosity, speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter coefficient (BSC) were measured for unfiltered and filtered BMFs and compared to IEC-61685 reference values. BMFs were evaluated using power Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in a calibrated custom-made microflow phantom at 5 and 20 mm/s, using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a performance metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FOM accurately tracked particle distribution and enabled obtaining neutrally buoyant BMFs. Filtration significantly impacted BSC (p < 0.05) but did not affect other properties. BMF 2 matched all the IEC-61685 reference values (p > 0.05). BMF 1 exhibited the lowest dynamic viscosity, while BMF 3 had the highest BSC. BMF 2 yielded the highest CNR at 5 mm/s in both imaging modes. At 20 mm/s, BMF 3 yielded the highest CNR in power Doppler imaging, while all BMFs performed similarly in CEUS. BMF 2 provided similar CNRs across flow velocities in both imaging modes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive methodology for BMF preparation and characterization was developed, which enabled identifying a formulation that aligned with the IEC-61685 standard. This methodology could establish a foundation for developing reproducible and well-characterized BMFs, facilitating the advance of quantitative flow imaging techniques with ultrasound.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characterization of Blood-Mimicking Fluids for Quantitative Flow Imaging with Ultrasound.
Objective: This study aimed at characterizing blood-mimicking fluids (BMFs), focusing on properties relevant to standardizing quantitative imaging biomarkers in vascular and microvascular ultrasound.
Methods: Three BMF formulations (BMFs 1-3) were prepared following the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)-61685 standard, varying in dynamic viscosity and particle buoyancy. A novel figure of merit (FOM) assessed particle buoyancy over time. Density, dynamic viscosity, speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter coefficient (BSC) were measured for unfiltered and filtered BMFs and compared to IEC-61685 reference values. BMFs were evaluated using power Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in a calibrated custom-made microflow phantom at 5 and 20 mm/s, using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a performance metric.
Results: The FOM accurately tracked particle distribution and enabled obtaining neutrally buoyant BMFs. Filtration significantly impacted BSC (p < 0.05) but did not affect other properties. BMF 2 matched all the IEC-61685 reference values (p > 0.05). BMF 1 exhibited the lowest dynamic viscosity, while BMF 3 had the highest BSC. BMF 2 yielded the highest CNR at 5 mm/s in both imaging modes. At 20 mm/s, BMF 3 yielded the highest CNR in power Doppler imaging, while all BMFs performed similarly in CEUS. BMF 2 provided similar CNRs across flow velocities in both imaging modes.
Conclusion: A comprehensive methodology for BMF preparation and characterization was developed, which enabled identifying a formulation that aligned with the IEC-61685 standard. This methodology could establish a foundation for developing reproducible and well-characterized BMFs, facilitating the advance of quantitative flow imaging techniques with ultrasound.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.