在美国急诊医学住院医师项目中实施基于能力的医学教育的5个核心组成部分。

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1
Holly A Caretta-Weyer, Benjamin H Schnapp, Charles A Brown, Abra Fant, Michael A Gisondi, Charles W Kropf, Matthew Magda, Matthew Pirotte, Kevin R Scott, Lalena M Yarris
{"title":"在美国急诊医学住院医师项目中实施基于能力的医学教育的5个核心组成部分。","authors":"Holly A Caretta-Weyer, Benjamin H Schnapp, Charles A Brown, Abra Fant, Michael A Gisondi, Charles W Kropf, Matthew Magda, Matthew Pirotte, Kevin R Scott, Lalena M Yarris","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> As graduate medical education programs implement competency-based medical education (CBME) approaches, many specialties struggle to adopt this paradigm in a way that successfully incorporates the 5 core components of CBME. <b>Objective</b> To develop and implement the 5 core components of CBME within 8 US emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and assess acceptability and feasibility. <b>Methods</b> We designed an intervention to implement the 5 core components of CBME: (1) an outcomes framework; (2) developmental progression; (3) tailored learning experiences; (4) competency-focused instruction or coaching; and (5) programmatic assessment. A consensus process to develop the framework and developmental trajectory was followed and included the development and deployment of programmatic assessment, coaching programs, and individualized learning plans using a shared model for implementation. We implemented the intervention beginning in August 2021. We surveyed site implementation leads about its feasibility and acceptability. <b>Results</b> The survey response rate was 100% (8 of 8). Estimated time required for the project intervention was 2 to 15 hours per month and 4 to 21.4 hours per month for the program coordinator and program leadership, respectively, with no additional salary provided. Residents and faculty received brief training about the CBME program (0.25 to 1 hours for residents and 0.5 to 1 hour for faculty), with periodic reminders afterward. Site leads perceived mixed acceptability from residents and faculty. Perceived challenges to implementation included resistance to change, time limitations, faculty discomfort with providing written assessment data, and difficulties navigating institutional barriers to technology-enhanced data collection. <b>Conclusions</b> CBME was estimated to require manageable time for program staff and leadership, with mixed acceptability from residents and faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"17 2 Suppl","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the 5 Core Components of Competency-Based Medical Education in US Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Holly A Caretta-Weyer, Benjamin H Schnapp, Charles A Brown, Abra Fant, Michael A Gisondi, Charles W Kropf, Matthew Magda, Matthew Pirotte, Kevin R Scott, Lalena M Yarris\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> As graduate medical education programs implement competency-based medical education (CBME) approaches, many specialties struggle to adopt this paradigm in a way that successfully incorporates the 5 core components of CBME. <b>Objective</b> To develop and implement the 5 core components of CBME within 8 US emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and assess acceptability and feasibility. <b>Methods</b> We designed an intervention to implement the 5 core components of CBME: (1) an outcomes framework; (2) developmental progression; (3) tailored learning experiences; (4) competency-focused instruction or coaching; and (5) programmatic assessment. A consensus process to develop the framework and developmental trajectory was followed and included the development and deployment of programmatic assessment, coaching programs, and individualized learning plans using a shared model for implementation. We implemented the intervention beginning in August 2021. We surveyed site implementation leads about its feasibility and acceptability. <b>Results</b> The survey response rate was 100% (8 of 8). Estimated time required for the project intervention was 2 to 15 hours per month and 4 to 21.4 hours per month for the program coordinator and program leadership, respectively, with no additional salary provided. Residents and faculty received brief training about the CBME program (0.25 to 1 hours for residents and 0.5 to 1 hour for faculty), with periodic reminders afterward. Site leads perceived mixed acceptability from residents and faculty. Perceived challenges to implementation included resistance to change, time limitations, faculty discomfort with providing written assessment data, and difficulties navigating institutional barriers to technology-enhanced data collection. <b>Conclusions</b> CBME was estimated to require manageable time for program staff and leadership, with mixed acceptability from residents and faculty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"17 2 Suppl\",\"pages\":\"57-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着研究生医学教育项目实施基于能力的医学教育(CBME)方法,许多专业努力采用这种范式,成功地结合了CBME的5个核心组成部分。目的在美国8个急诊医学(EM)住院医师项目中制定和实施CBME的5个核心组成部分,并评估其可接受性和可行性。我们设计了一种干预措施来实施CBME的5个核心组成部分:(1)结果框架;(2)发育进展;(3)量身定制的学习体验;(4)以能力为中心的指导或辅导;(5)纲领性评估。遵循了制定框架和发展轨迹的共识过程,其中包括开发和部署程序性评估、指导计划和使用共享模型实施的个性化学习计划。我们从2021年8月开始实施干预措施。我们调查了现场实施方案的可行性和可接受性。结果调查回复率为100%(8 / 8)。项目干预所需的估计时间分别为每月2至15小时,项目协调员和项目领导每月4至21.4小时,不提供额外工资。住院医师和教职员工接受了关于CBME项目的简短培训(住院医师0.25至1小时,教职员工0.5至1小时),培训结束后会定期提醒。现场领导认为居民和教师的接受程度不一。实施过程中面临的挑战包括对变革的抵制、时间限制、教师对提供书面评估数据的不适应,以及在技术增强数据收集方面遇到的制度性障碍。结论CBME估计需要项目工作人员和领导管理的时间,住院医生和教师的接受程度不一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing the 5 Core Components of Competency-Based Medical Education in US Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.

Background As graduate medical education programs implement competency-based medical education (CBME) approaches, many specialties struggle to adopt this paradigm in a way that successfully incorporates the 5 core components of CBME. Objective To develop and implement the 5 core components of CBME within 8 US emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and assess acceptability and feasibility. Methods We designed an intervention to implement the 5 core components of CBME: (1) an outcomes framework; (2) developmental progression; (3) tailored learning experiences; (4) competency-focused instruction or coaching; and (5) programmatic assessment. A consensus process to develop the framework and developmental trajectory was followed and included the development and deployment of programmatic assessment, coaching programs, and individualized learning plans using a shared model for implementation. We implemented the intervention beginning in August 2021. We surveyed site implementation leads about its feasibility and acceptability. Results The survey response rate was 100% (8 of 8). Estimated time required for the project intervention was 2 to 15 hours per month and 4 to 21.4 hours per month for the program coordinator and program leadership, respectively, with no additional salary provided. Residents and faculty received brief training about the CBME program (0.25 to 1 hours for residents and 0.5 to 1 hour for faculty), with periodic reminders afterward. Site leads perceived mixed acceptability from residents and faculty. Perceived challenges to implementation included resistance to change, time limitations, faculty discomfort with providing written assessment data, and difficulties navigating institutional barriers to technology-enhanced data collection. Conclusions CBME was estimated to require manageable time for program staff and leadership, with mixed acceptability from residents and faculty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信