Holly A Caretta-Weyer, Benjamin H Schnapp, Charles A Brown, Abra Fant, Michael A Gisondi, Charles W Kropf, Matthew Magda, Matthew Pirotte, Kevin R Scott, Lalena M Yarris
{"title":"在美国急诊医学住院医师项目中实施基于能力的医学教育的5个核心组成部分。","authors":"Holly A Caretta-Weyer, Benjamin H Schnapp, Charles A Brown, Abra Fant, Michael A Gisondi, Charles W Kropf, Matthew Magda, Matthew Pirotte, Kevin R Scott, Lalena M Yarris","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> As graduate medical education programs implement competency-based medical education (CBME) approaches, many specialties struggle to adopt this paradigm in a way that successfully incorporates the 5 core components of CBME. <b>Objective</b> To develop and implement the 5 core components of CBME within 8 US emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and assess acceptability and feasibility. <b>Methods</b> We designed an intervention to implement the 5 core components of CBME: (1) an outcomes framework; (2) developmental progression; (3) tailored learning experiences; (4) competency-focused instruction or coaching; and (5) programmatic assessment. A consensus process to develop the framework and developmental trajectory was followed and included the development and deployment of programmatic assessment, coaching programs, and individualized learning plans using a shared model for implementation. We implemented the intervention beginning in August 2021. We surveyed site implementation leads about its feasibility and acceptability. <b>Results</b> The survey response rate was 100% (8 of 8). Estimated time required for the project intervention was 2 to 15 hours per month and 4 to 21.4 hours per month for the program coordinator and program leadership, respectively, with no additional salary provided. Residents and faculty received brief training about the CBME program (0.25 to 1 hours for residents and 0.5 to 1 hour for faculty), with periodic reminders afterward. Site leads perceived mixed acceptability from residents and faculty. Perceived challenges to implementation included resistance to change, time limitations, faculty discomfort with providing written assessment data, and difficulties navigating institutional barriers to technology-enhanced data collection. <b>Conclusions</b> CBME was estimated to require manageable time for program staff and leadership, with mixed acceptability from residents and faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"17 2 Suppl","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the 5 Core Components of Competency-Based Medical Education in US Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Holly A Caretta-Weyer, Benjamin H Schnapp, Charles A Brown, Abra Fant, Michael A Gisondi, Charles W Kropf, Matthew Magda, Matthew Pirotte, Kevin R Scott, Lalena M Yarris\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> As graduate medical education programs implement competency-based medical education (CBME) approaches, many specialties struggle to adopt this paradigm in a way that successfully incorporates the 5 core components of CBME. <b>Objective</b> To develop and implement the 5 core components of CBME within 8 US emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and assess acceptability and feasibility. <b>Methods</b> We designed an intervention to implement the 5 core components of CBME: (1) an outcomes framework; (2) developmental progression; (3) tailored learning experiences; (4) competency-focused instruction or coaching; and (5) programmatic assessment. A consensus process to develop the framework and developmental trajectory was followed and included the development and deployment of programmatic assessment, coaching programs, and individualized learning plans using a shared model for implementation. We implemented the intervention beginning in August 2021. We surveyed site implementation leads about its feasibility and acceptability. <b>Results</b> The survey response rate was 100% (8 of 8). Estimated time required for the project intervention was 2 to 15 hours per month and 4 to 21.4 hours per month for the program coordinator and program leadership, respectively, with no additional salary provided. Residents and faculty received brief training about the CBME program (0.25 to 1 hours for residents and 0.5 to 1 hour for faculty), with periodic reminders afterward. Site leads perceived mixed acceptability from residents and faculty. Perceived challenges to implementation included resistance to change, time limitations, faculty discomfort with providing written assessment data, and difficulties navigating institutional barriers to technology-enhanced data collection. <b>Conclusions</b> CBME was estimated to require manageable time for program staff and leadership, with mixed acceptability from residents and faculty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"17 2 Suppl\",\"pages\":\"57-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00639.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementing the 5 Core Components of Competency-Based Medical Education in US Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.
Background As graduate medical education programs implement competency-based medical education (CBME) approaches, many specialties struggle to adopt this paradigm in a way that successfully incorporates the 5 core components of CBME. Objective To develop and implement the 5 core components of CBME within 8 US emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and assess acceptability and feasibility. Methods We designed an intervention to implement the 5 core components of CBME: (1) an outcomes framework; (2) developmental progression; (3) tailored learning experiences; (4) competency-focused instruction or coaching; and (5) programmatic assessment. A consensus process to develop the framework and developmental trajectory was followed and included the development and deployment of programmatic assessment, coaching programs, and individualized learning plans using a shared model for implementation. We implemented the intervention beginning in August 2021. We surveyed site implementation leads about its feasibility and acceptability. Results The survey response rate was 100% (8 of 8). Estimated time required for the project intervention was 2 to 15 hours per month and 4 to 21.4 hours per month for the program coordinator and program leadership, respectively, with no additional salary provided. Residents and faculty received brief training about the CBME program (0.25 to 1 hours for residents and 0.5 to 1 hour for faculty), with periodic reminders afterward. Site leads perceived mixed acceptability from residents and faculty. Perceived challenges to implementation included resistance to change, time limitations, faculty discomfort with providing written assessment data, and difficulties navigating institutional barriers to technology-enhanced data collection. Conclusions CBME was estimated to require manageable time for program staff and leadership, with mixed acceptability from residents and faculty.
期刊介绍:
- Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.