在华盛顿州的海洋水域,使用1/0和6/0鱼钩在娱乐巨鱼渔场着陆的coho三文鱼的预期死亡风险。

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.19434
Jonathan J Scordino, Ryan P Walsh, William Jasper, Deon J Roche, William Tyler
{"title":"在华盛顿州的海洋水域,使用1/0和6/0鱼钩在娱乐巨鱼渔场着陆的coho三文鱼的预期死亡风险。","authors":"Jonathan J Scordino, Ryan P Walsh, William Jasper, Deon J Roche, William Tyler","doi":"10.7717/peerj.19434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recreational salmon fisheries in the state of Washington are managed with size-selective and mark-selective rules to promote the release of wild and undersized salmon. In order for this management approach to be effective, the fishery must have low mortality of hooked and released salmon. In this study, we directly compared the fishing performance of small (1/0, 14.36 mm gap) and large (6/0, 17.20 mm gap) hooks in recreational salmon troll fisheries with the goal of evaluating differences in drop-off rates, size of salmon caught, and the probability a fish would be hooked in a region documented to have low, intermediary, or high risk of mortality. We found strong evidence that hook size affects the probability that an angler can land a fish with drop-off rates of 48.9% for fish hooked on small (1/0) hooks and 34.0% for fish hooked on large (6/0) hooks. There were no significant differences in the average length of pink, coho, or Chinook salmon caught on small (1/0) or large (6/0) hooks. Likewise, we found no significant differences in the proportion of coho and Chinook catch that were longer or shorter than their respective legal-size limits. Hook size did significantly affect the expected mortality risk of coho salmon with large (6/0) hooks being 1.82 times more likely to hook a salmon in body regions associated with high or intermediary risk of mortality than small (1/0) hooks. No significant differences were observed in the hooking rates of Chinook and pink salmon in body regions with high, intermediary, or low expected mortality risk, however our confidence in this finding is limited due to sample size. It is important to carefully assess whether these results support restrictions on hook sizes used in recreational coho salmon troll fisheries. The observation of reduced expected mortality risk of coho salmon landed using small (1/0) hooks as compared to when using large (6/0) hooks highlights the importance of evaluating the effect of hook size during recreational salmon troll fisheries on post-release survival and will hopefully stimulate more research on the effects of hook size and modeling on whether hook size regulations can improve salmon conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e19434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expected mortality risk for coho salmon landed in recreational troll fisheries using 1/0 and 6/0 hooks in the marine waters of Washington state.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan J Scordino, Ryan P Walsh, William Jasper, Deon J Roche, William Tyler\",\"doi\":\"10.7717/peerj.19434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recreational salmon fisheries in the state of Washington are managed with size-selective and mark-selective rules to promote the release of wild and undersized salmon. In order for this management approach to be effective, the fishery must have low mortality of hooked and released salmon. In this study, we directly compared the fishing performance of small (1/0, 14.36 mm gap) and large (6/0, 17.20 mm gap) hooks in recreational salmon troll fisheries with the goal of evaluating differences in drop-off rates, size of salmon caught, and the probability a fish would be hooked in a region documented to have low, intermediary, or high risk of mortality. We found strong evidence that hook size affects the probability that an angler can land a fish with drop-off rates of 48.9% for fish hooked on small (1/0) hooks and 34.0% for fish hooked on large (6/0) hooks. There were no significant differences in the average length of pink, coho, or Chinook salmon caught on small (1/0) or large (6/0) hooks. Likewise, we found no significant differences in the proportion of coho and Chinook catch that were longer or shorter than their respective legal-size limits. Hook size did significantly affect the expected mortality risk of coho salmon with large (6/0) hooks being 1.82 times more likely to hook a salmon in body regions associated with high or intermediary risk of mortality than small (1/0) hooks. No significant differences were observed in the hooking rates of Chinook and pink salmon in body regions with high, intermediary, or low expected mortality risk, however our confidence in this finding is limited due to sample size. It is important to carefully assess whether these results support restrictions on hook sizes used in recreational coho salmon troll fisheries. The observation of reduced expected mortality risk of coho salmon landed using small (1/0) hooks as compared to when using large (6/0) hooks highlights the importance of evaluating the effect of hook size during recreational salmon troll fisheries on post-release survival and will hopefully stimulate more research on the effects of hook size and modeling on whether hook size regulations can improve salmon conservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e19434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19434\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

华盛顿州的休闲鲑鱼渔场采用尺寸选择性和标记选择性规则进行管理,以促进野生和小型鲑鱼的释放。为了使这种管理方法有效,渔业必须使钩住和释放的鲑鱼死亡率低。在这项研究中,我们直接比较了休闲鲑鱼巨鱼渔场中小钩(1/ 0,14.36 mm间隙)和大钩(6/ 0,17.20 mm间隙)的捕捞性能,目的是评估在下降率、捕获的鲑鱼大小以及在记录的低、中、高死亡率区域钓到鱼的概率的差异。我们发现强有力的证据表明,钩的大小会影响垂钓者钓到鱼的概率,用小(1/0)钩的鱼的落差率为48.9%,用大(6/0)钩的鱼的落差率为34.0%。用小钩(1/0)和大钩(6/0)捕获的粉鲑、银鲑和奇努克鲑鱼的平均长度没有显著差异。同样,我们发现长或短于各自法定尺寸限制的银银鱼和支努干鱼的捕获比例没有显着差异。鱼钩尺寸确实显著影响银鲑的预期死亡风险,其中大鱼钩钩到高或中等死亡风险区域的可能性是小鱼钩的1.82倍(1/0)。在预期死亡率高、中、低的身体区域,我们没有观察到奇努克鲑鱼和粉红鲑鱼的钩钩率有显著差异,然而,由于样本量的限制,我们对这一发现的信心有限。重要的是要仔细评估这些结果是否支持对娱乐性银鲑巨鲑渔业中使用的鱼钩尺寸进行限制。与使用大钩子(6/0)相比,使用小钩子(1/0)着陆的coho salmon的预期死亡风险降低,这一观察结果突出了在休闲鲑鱼巨鱼渔业中评估钩子尺寸对释放后生存的影响的重要性,并有望激发更多关于钩子尺寸影响的研究和关于钩子尺寸法规是否可以改善鲑鱼保护的建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expected mortality risk for coho salmon landed in recreational troll fisheries using 1/0 and 6/0 hooks in the marine waters of Washington state.

Recreational salmon fisheries in the state of Washington are managed with size-selective and mark-selective rules to promote the release of wild and undersized salmon. In order for this management approach to be effective, the fishery must have low mortality of hooked and released salmon. In this study, we directly compared the fishing performance of small (1/0, 14.36 mm gap) and large (6/0, 17.20 mm gap) hooks in recreational salmon troll fisheries with the goal of evaluating differences in drop-off rates, size of salmon caught, and the probability a fish would be hooked in a region documented to have low, intermediary, or high risk of mortality. We found strong evidence that hook size affects the probability that an angler can land a fish with drop-off rates of 48.9% for fish hooked on small (1/0) hooks and 34.0% for fish hooked on large (6/0) hooks. There were no significant differences in the average length of pink, coho, or Chinook salmon caught on small (1/0) or large (6/0) hooks. Likewise, we found no significant differences in the proportion of coho and Chinook catch that were longer or shorter than their respective legal-size limits. Hook size did significantly affect the expected mortality risk of coho salmon with large (6/0) hooks being 1.82 times more likely to hook a salmon in body regions associated with high or intermediary risk of mortality than small (1/0) hooks. No significant differences were observed in the hooking rates of Chinook and pink salmon in body regions with high, intermediary, or low expected mortality risk, however our confidence in this finding is limited due to sample size. It is important to carefully assess whether these results support restrictions on hook sizes used in recreational coho salmon troll fisheries. The observation of reduced expected mortality risk of coho salmon landed using small (1/0) hooks as compared to when using large (6/0) hooks highlights the importance of evaluating the effect of hook size during recreational salmon troll fisheries on post-release survival and will hopefully stimulate more research on the effects of hook size and modeling on whether hook size regulations can improve salmon conservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信