Nelofar Deen, Zhuoting Zhu, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Gabriella Bulloch, Di Miao, Mingguang He
{"title":"重复低强度红光治疗在学童近视控制中的三个月中期分析:一项多民族随机对照试验。","authors":"Nelofar Deen, Zhuoting Zhu, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Gabriella Bulloch, Di Miao, Mingguang He","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2500020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic school-aged children. This report focuses on interim three-month data analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-ethnic, parallel controlled randomized trial. Thirty-four children aged 8-13 years with myopia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group (<i>n</i> = 17) or the single-vision spectacles (SVS) control group (<i>n</i> = 17). RLRL therapy was administered twice daily on weekdays for three-minute sessions, while the SVS group continued routine activities. Assessments were scheduled at baseline and follow-up visits at one, three, six and 12 months, with compliance monitoring and safety assessments throughout. Respectively the primary outcome and a key secondary outcome are axial length (AL) change and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 (94.1%) participated in the three-month follow-up visit. The RLRL group demonstrated a significant shortening in AL ( - 0.06 ± 0.05 mm) compared to the SVS group (0.02 ± 0.06 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the RLRL group demonstrated a reversal in SE (0.23 ± 0.18 D), whereas the SVS group exhibited a smaller increase (0.04 ± 0.43 D). No severe adverse events were reported in either of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three-month interim analysis shows that RLRL therapy effectively controls myopia progression among multi-ethnic children without safety concerns, suggesting its potential as a globally applicable solution for myopia control.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Month Interim Analyses of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy in Myopia Control in Schoolchildren: A Pilot Multi-Ethnic Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nelofar Deen, Zhuoting Zhu, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Gabriella Bulloch, Di Miao, Mingguang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09286586.2025.2500020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic school-aged children. This report focuses on interim three-month data analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-ethnic, parallel controlled randomized trial. Thirty-four children aged 8-13 years with myopia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group (<i>n</i> = 17) or the single-vision spectacles (SVS) control group (<i>n</i> = 17). RLRL therapy was administered twice daily on weekdays for three-minute sessions, while the SVS group continued routine activities. Assessments were scheduled at baseline and follow-up visits at one, three, six and 12 months, with compliance monitoring and safety assessments throughout. Respectively the primary outcome and a key secondary outcome are axial length (AL) change and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 (94.1%) participated in the three-month follow-up visit. The RLRL group demonstrated a significant shortening in AL ( - 0.06 ± 0.05 mm) compared to the SVS group (0.02 ± 0.06 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the RLRL group demonstrated a reversal in SE (0.23 ± 0.18 D), whereas the SVS group exhibited a smaller increase (0.04 ± 0.43 D). No severe adverse events were reported in either of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three-month interim analysis shows that RLRL therapy effectively controls myopia progression among multi-ethnic children without safety concerns, suggesting its potential as a globally applicable solution for myopia control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2500020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2500020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three-Month Interim Analyses of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy in Myopia Control in Schoolchildren: A Pilot Multi-Ethnic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic school-aged children. This report focuses on interim three-month data analysis.
Methods: A multi-ethnic, parallel controlled randomized trial. Thirty-four children aged 8-13 years with myopia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group (n = 17) or the single-vision spectacles (SVS) control group (n = 17). RLRL therapy was administered twice daily on weekdays for three-minute sessions, while the SVS group continued routine activities. Assessments were scheduled at baseline and follow-up visits at one, three, six and 12 months, with compliance monitoring and safety assessments throughout. Respectively the primary outcome and a key secondary outcome are axial length (AL) change and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) change.
Results: A total of 32 (94.1%) participated in the three-month follow-up visit. The RLRL group demonstrated a significant shortening in AL ( - 0.06 ± 0.05 mm) compared to the SVS group (0.02 ± 0.06 mm, p < 0.001). Similarly, the RLRL group demonstrated a reversal in SE (0.23 ± 0.18 D), whereas the SVS group exhibited a smaller increase (0.04 ± 0.43 D). No severe adverse events were reported in either of the groups.
Conclusions: The three-month interim analysis shows that RLRL therapy effectively controls myopia progression among multi-ethnic children without safety concerns, suggesting its potential as a globally applicable solution for myopia control.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.