Michelle K Page, Noel J Leigh, Ashleigh C Block, Poppy H Marrano, Matthew B Travers, Juan E Adrover, Grace E Maley, Lauren A Koenig, Eman M Salem, Scott D Heldwein, Maciej L Goniewicz
{"title":"无烟与含烟口腔微袋尼古丁及部分香料含量的比较。","authors":"Michelle K Page, Noel J Leigh, Ashleigh C Block, Poppy H Marrano, Matthew B Travers, Juan E Adrover, Grace E Maley, Lauren A Koenig, Eman M Salem, Scott D Heldwein, Maciej L Goniewicz","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Flavored oral tobacco-free pouches (ONPs) are novel products that resemble traditional oral tobacco-containing pouches (OTPs) in design and route of administration. However, ONPs contain nicotine, various additives, and a filler material rather than tobacco leaves. Our study compares nicotine content, release, and form, along with selected flavorings content, between brands of ONPs and OTPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of flavored ONPs (n=10 brands) and OTPs (n=7 brands) were purchased between 2021 and 2023. Total nicotine content in the pouches, nicotine released over 1 hour, isomer ratio (R:S-nicotine), and 33 flavoring chemicals were measured using chromatography methods. Nicotine form (the proportion of nicotine in the protonated versus freebase forms) was calculated after measuring the pH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although ONPs contained, on average, 50% less nicotine than OTPs (6.4±3.5 vs. 12.3±8.2mg/pouch, p<0.001), they released similar amounts of nicotine within 5 minutes (ONPs 6.5±3.9 vs OTPs 7.6±3.9 mg/pouch, p=0.422). The nicotine used in ONPs compared to OTPs was primarily freebase (63.4%±25.2% vs. 47.2%±34.4%, p=0.223). Two ONPs contained racemic nicotine, suggesting its synthetic source. Menthol was the most frequently used flavoring chemical in both ONPs and OTPs. Triacetin was the most concentrated flavoring in ONPs (12.7±12.7mg/pouch) and methyl salicylate the most in OTPs (25.1±1.8mg/pouch).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ONPs have a similar nicotine release profile as OTPs but contain a high fraction of the freebase nicotine and a wide range of flavorings. The presence of freebase nicotine and flavorings in ONPs may contribute to differential abuse liability of those novel products compared to OTPs.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This is the first non-industry study to compare nicotine content, release, form, and select flavoring composition between multiple ONPs and OTPs. These findings have implications if any future modified risk claims for ONPs are considered. Although nicotine content was significantly higher in OTPs than in ONPs, the amount of nicotine released from the pouch was very similar between ONPs and OTPs. While many flavoring chemicals present in ONPs and OTPs are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for oral consumption, their potential oral health risk in ONP and OTP users has not been evaluated and therefore must be monitored and assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Nicotine and Selected Flavorings Content Between Tobacco-Free and Tobacco-Containing Oral Pouches.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle K Page, Noel J Leigh, Ashleigh C Block, Poppy H Marrano, Matthew B Travers, Juan E Adrover, Grace E Maley, Lauren A Koenig, Eman M Salem, Scott D Heldwein, Maciej L Goniewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Flavored oral tobacco-free pouches (ONPs) are novel products that resemble traditional oral tobacco-containing pouches (OTPs) in design and route of administration. However, ONPs contain nicotine, various additives, and a filler material rather than tobacco leaves. Our study compares nicotine content, release, and form, along with selected flavorings content, between brands of ONPs and OTPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of flavored ONPs (n=10 brands) and OTPs (n=7 brands) were purchased between 2021 and 2023. Total nicotine content in the pouches, nicotine released over 1 hour, isomer ratio (R:S-nicotine), and 33 flavoring chemicals were measured using chromatography methods. Nicotine form (the proportion of nicotine in the protonated versus freebase forms) was calculated after measuring the pH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although ONPs contained, on average, 50% less nicotine than OTPs (6.4±3.5 vs. 12.3±8.2mg/pouch, p<0.001), they released similar amounts of nicotine within 5 minutes (ONPs 6.5±3.9 vs OTPs 7.6±3.9 mg/pouch, p=0.422). The nicotine used in ONPs compared to OTPs was primarily freebase (63.4%±25.2% vs. 47.2%±34.4%, p=0.223). Two ONPs contained racemic nicotine, suggesting its synthetic source. Menthol was the most frequently used flavoring chemical in both ONPs and OTPs. Triacetin was the most concentrated flavoring in ONPs (12.7±12.7mg/pouch) and methyl salicylate the most in OTPs (25.1±1.8mg/pouch).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ONPs have a similar nicotine release profile as OTPs but contain a high fraction of the freebase nicotine and a wide range of flavorings. The presence of freebase nicotine and flavorings in ONPs may contribute to differential abuse liability of those novel products compared to OTPs.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This is the first non-industry study to compare nicotine content, release, form, and select flavoring composition between multiple ONPs and OTPs. These findings have implications if any future modified risk claims for ONPs are considered. Although nicotine content was significantly higher in OTPs than in ONPs, the amount of nicotine released from the pouch was very similar between ONPs and OTPs. While many flavoring chemicals present in ONPs and OTPs are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for oral consumption, their potential oral health risk in ONP and OTP users has not been evaluated and therefore must be monitored and assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:风味口服无烟草袋(ONPs)是一种新颖的产品,在设计和给药途径上类似于传统的口服含烟草袋(OTPs)。然而,电子烟含有尼古丁、各种添加剂和一种填充材料,而不是烟叶。我们的研究比较了尼古丁的含量、释放和形式,以及选择的香料含量,在不同品牌的尼古丁香烟和尼古丁香烟之间。方法:选取2021 - 2023年间购买的调味ONPs (n=10个品牌)和OTPs (n=7个品牌)的方便样品。用色谱法测定烟袋中总烟碱含量、1 h内烟碱释放量、同分异构体比(R: s -尼古丁)和33种调味物质。测定ph值后计算烟碱形态(质子化烟碱与游离烟碱的比例)。结果:烟碱形态的烟碱含量平均比烟碱形态低50%(6.4±3.5 mg/袋比12.3±8.2mg/袋)。结论:烟碱形态与烟碱形态的烟碱释放谱相似,但游离烟碱含量较高,且有多种调味剂。在线电子烟中游离尼古丁和调味剂的存在可能导致这些新产品与在线电子烟相比有不同的滥用倾向。意义:这是第一个比较尼古丁含量、释放量、形式和选择多种ONPs和otp之间的调味成分的非工业研究。如果考虑未来任何修改后的onp风险索赔,这些发现具有启示意义。虽然烟碱含量明显高于烟碱,但烟碱从烟袋中释放的量在烟碱和烟碱之间非常相似。虽然通常认为口服食用的ONP和OTP中存在的许多调味化学品是安全的(GRAS),但它们对ONP和OTP使用者的潜在口腔健康风险尚未得到评估,因此必须进行监测和评估。
Comparison of Nicotine and Selected Flavorings Content Between Tobacco-Free and Tobacco-Containing Oral Pouches.
Introduction: Flavored oral tobacco-free pouches (ONPs) are novel products that resemble traditional oral tobacco-containing pouches (OTPs) in design and route of administration. However, ONPs contain nicotine, various additives, and a filler material rather than tobacco leaves. Our study compares nicotine content, release, and form, along with selected flavorings content, between brands of ONPs and OTPs.
Methods: A convenience sample of flavored ONPs (n=10 brands) and OTPs (n=7 brands) were purchased between 2021 and 2023. Total nicotine content in the pouches, nicotine released over 1 hour, isomer ratio (R:S-nicotine), and 33 flavoring chemicals were measured using chromatography methods. Nicotine form (the proportion of nicotine in the protonated versus freebase forms) was calculated after measuring the pH.
Results: Although ONPs contained, on average, 50% less nicotine than OTPs (6.4±3.5 vs. 12.3±8.2mg/pouch, p<0.001), they released similar amounts of nicotine within 5 minutes (ONPs 6.5±3.9 vs OTPs 7.6±3.9 mg/pouch, p=0.422). The nicotine used in ONPs compared to OTPs was primarily freebase (63.4%±25.2% vs. 47.2%±34.4%, p=0.223). Two ONPs contained racemic nicotine, suggesting its synthetic source. Menthol was the most frequently used flavoring chemical in both ONPs and OTPs. Triacetin was the most concentrated flavoring in ONPs (12.7±12.7mg/pouch) and methyl salicylate the most in OTPs (25.1±1.8mg/pouch).
Conclusions: ONPs have a similar nicotine release profile as OTPs but contain a high fraction of the freebase nicotine and a wide range of flavorings. The presence of freebase nicotine and flavorings in ONPs may contribute to differential abuse liability of those novel products compared to OTPs.
Implications: This is the first non-industry study to compare nicotine content, release, form, and select flavoring composition between multiple ONPs and OTPs. These findings have implications if any future modified risk claims for ONPs are considered. Although nicotine content was significantly higher in OTPs than in ONPs, the amount of nicotine released from the pouch was very similar between ONPs and OTPs. While many flavoring chemicals present in ONPs and OTPs are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for oral consumption, their potential oral health risk in ONP and OTP users has not been evaluated and therefore must be monitored and assessed.
期刊介绍:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco.
It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas.
Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.