Ömer Hatipoğlu, Ömer Yıldırım, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu
{"title":"胃食管反流病对唾液流速、pH和缓冲能力的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Ömer Hatipoğlu, Ömer Yıldırım, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu","doi":"10.1111/joor.14025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on salivary parameters, including salivary pH (SpH), stimulated salivary flow rate (SSFR), unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR), and salivary buffer capacity (SBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough review of the literature was carried out across various databases, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies that focused on patients with GERD and assessed the specified salivary parameters were included. The data was synthesised and analysed using standard meta-analytical techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 21 studies. GERD patients exhibited significantly lower SpH (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.02), SSFR (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.18), and SBC (MD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.19) compared to healthy controls. No significant reduction was observed in USFR (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated significant reductions in SpH, SSFR, and SBC in both Reflux Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease groups. Proton pump inhibitor usage was associated with further reductions in SpH (MD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.06) and SBC (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.27), but did not significantly impact USFR. Excluding studies with high and moderate risk of bias confirmed the robustness of the significant reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While GERD may reduce SpH, SSFR, and SBC, the evidence supporting these conclusions is uncertain due to inherent weaknesses in the existing studies. Regular monitoring of these parameters is essential for effective oral health management in patients diagnosed with GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Buffer Capacity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Hatipoğlu, Ömer Yıldırım, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joor.14025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on salivary parameters, including salivary pH (SpH), stimulated salivary flow rate (SSFR), unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR), and salivary buffer capacity (SBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough review of the literature was carried out across various databases, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies that focused on patients with GERD and assessed the specified salivary parameters were included. The data was synthesised and analysed using standard meta-analytical techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 21 studies. GERD patients exhibited significantly lower SpH (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.02), SSFR (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.18), and SBC (MD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.19) compared to healthy controls. No significant reduction was observed in USFR (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated significant reductions in SpH, SSFR, and SBC in both Reflux Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease groups. Proton pump inhibitor usage was associated with further reductions in SpH (MD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.06) and SBC (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.27), but did not significantly impact USFR. Excluding studies with high and moderate risk of bias confirmed the robustness of the significant reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While GERD may reduce SpH, SSFR, and SBC, the evidence supporting these conclusions is uncertain due to inherent weaknesses in the existing studies. Regular monitoring of these parameters is essential for effective oral health management in patients diagnosed with GERD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.14025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.14025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Buffer Capacity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on salivary parameters, including salivary pH (SpH), stimulated salivary flow rate (SSFR), unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR), and salivary buffer capacity (SBC).
Methods: A thorough review of the literature was carried out across various databases, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies that focused on patients with GERD and assessed the specified salivary parameters were included. The data was synthesised and analysed using standard meta-analytical techniques.
Results: The meta-analysis included 21 studies. GERD patients exhibited significantly lower SpH (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.02), SSFR (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.18), and SBC (MD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.19) compared to healthy controls. No significant reduction was observed in USFR (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated significant reductions in SpH, SSFR, and SBC in both Reflux Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease groups. Proton pump inhibitor usage was associated with further reductions in SpH (MD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.06) and SBC (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.27), but did not significantly impact USFR. Excluding studies with high and moderate risk of bias confirmed the robustness of the significant reductions.
Conclusions: While GERD may reduce SpH, SSFR, and SBC, the evidence supporting these conclusions is uncertain due to inherent weaknesses in the existing studies. Regular monitoring of these parameters is essential for effective oral health management in patients diagnosed with GERD.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.