胃食管反流病对唾液流速、pH和缓冲能力的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ömer Hatipoğlu, Ömer Yıldırım, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu
{"title":"胃食管反流病对唾液流速、pH和缓冲能力的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Ömer Hatipoğlu, Ömer Yıldırım, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu","doi":"10.1111/joor.14025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on salivary parameters, including salivary pH (SpH), stimulated salivary flow rate (SSFR), unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR), and salivary buffer capacity (SBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough review of the literature was carried out across various databases, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies that focused on patients with GERD and assessed the specified salivary parameters were included. The data was synthesised and analysed using standard meta-analytical techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 21 studies. GERD patients exhibited significantly lower SpH (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.02), SSFR (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.18), and SBC (MD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.19) compared to healthy controls. No significant reduction was observed in USFR (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated significant reductions in SpH, SSFR, and SBC in both Reflux Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease groups. Proton pump inhibitor usage was associated with further reductions in SpH (MD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.06) and SBC (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.27), but did not significantly impact USFR. Excluding studies with high and moderate risk of bias confirmed the robustness of the significant reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While GERD may reduce SpH, SSFR, and SBC, the evidence supporting these conclusions is uncertain due to inherent weaknesses in the existing studies. Regular monitoring of these parameters is essential for effective oral health management in patients diagnosed with GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Buffer Capacity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Hatipoğlu, Ömer Yıldırım, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joor.14025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on salivary parameters, including salivary pH (SpH), stimulated salivary flow rate (SSFR), unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR), and salivary buffer capacity (SBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough review of the literature was carried out across various databases, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies that focused on patients with GERD and assessed the specified salivary parameters were included. The data was synthesised and analysed using standard meta-analytical techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 21 studies. GERD patients exhibited significantly lower SpH (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.02), SSFR (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.18), and SBC (MD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.19) compared to healthy controls. No significant reduction was observed in USFR (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated significant reductions in SpH, SSFR, and SBC in both Reflux Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease groups. Proton pump inhibitor usage was associated with further reductions in SpH (MD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.06) and SBC (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.27), but did not significantly impact USFR. Excluding studies with high and moderate risk of bias confirmed the robustness of the significant reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While GERD may reduce SpH, SSFR, and SBC, the evidence supporting these conclusions is uncertain due to inherent weaknesses in the existing studies. Regular monitoring of these parameters is essential for effective oral health management in patients diagnosed with GERD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.14025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.14025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估胃食管反流病(GERD)对唾液参数的影响,包括唾液pH (SpH)、受刺激唾液流率(SSFR)、非受刺激唾液流率(USFR)和唾液缓冲能力(SBC)。方法:根据严格的纳入和排除标准,对不同数据库的文献进行全面的回顾。纳入了针对胃食管反流患者并评估特定唾液参数的研究。使用标准的元分析技术对数据进行综合和分析。结果:meta分析包括21项研究。与健康对照相比,GERD患者表现出显著降低的SpH (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.34至-0.02)、SSFR (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.51至-0.18)和SBC (MD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.67至-0.19)。USFR未见显著降低(MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.25 ~ 0.05)。亚组分析显示,在反流性食管炎和非糜烂性反流性疾病组中,SpH、SSFR和SBC均显著降低。质子泵抑制剂的使用与SpH (MD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37至-0.06)和SBC (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.80至-0.27)的进一步降低相关,但对USFR没有显著影响。排除高和中等偏倚风险的研究证实了显著降低的稳健性。结论:虽然胃食管反流可以降低SpH、SSFR和SBC,但由于现有研究的固有缺陷,支持这些结论的证据尚不确定。定期监测这些参数对于诊断为胃食管反流的患者进行有效的口腔健康管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Buffer Capacity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on salivary parameters, including salivary pH (SpH), stimulated salivary flow rate (SSFR), unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR), and salivary buffer capacity (SBC).

Methods: A thorough review of the literature was carried out across various databases, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies that focused on patients with GERD and assessed the specified salivary parameters were included. The data was synthesised and analysed using standard meta-analytical techniques.

Results: The meta-analysis included 21 studies. GERD patients exhibited significantly lower SpH (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.02), SSFR (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.18), and SBC (MD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.19) compared to healthy controls. No significant reduction was observed in USFR (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated significant reductions in SpH, SSFR, and SBC in both Reflux Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease groups. Proton pump inhibitor usage was associated with further reductions in SpH (MD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.06) and SBC (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.27), but did not significantly impact USFR. Excluding studies with high and moderate risk of bias confirmed the robustness of the significant reductions.

Conclusions: While GERD may reduce SpH, SSFR, and SBC, the evidence supporting these conclusions is uncertain due to inherent weaknesses in the existing studies. Regular monitoring of these parameters is essential for effective oral health management in patients diagnosed with GERD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信