青光眼患者对自我管理有效指导的看法。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Noah Lee Carey, Danielle Tahira DuPuis, George Lin, Elena Flores, Jamie Mitchell, Deborah Darnley-Fisch, Nauman Imami, Michele Heisler, Kenneth Resnicow, Phalatha McHaney-Conner, Asia Priester, Chamisa MacKenzie, Paula-Anne Newman-Casey
{"title":"青光眼患者对自我管理有效指导的看法。","authors":"Noah Lee Carey, Danielle Tahira DuPuis, George Lin, Elena Flores, Jamie Mitchell, Deborah Darnley-Fisch, Nauman Imami, Michele Heisler, Kenneth Resnicow, Phalatha McHaney-Conner, Asia Priester, Chamisa MacKenzie, Paula-Anne Newman-Casey","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Precis: </strong>In semi-structured exit interviews, participants in a personalized glaucoma coaching program reported improved self-efficacy in managing their disease. Coaching was frequently cited as catalyst to enhancing medication adherence, emphasizing its role in team-based care.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess patients' experience with coaching to motivate improved adherence to glaucoma self-management.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Participants in the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) personalized glaucoma coaching program completed exit interviews after participating in a six-month coaching program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretivist grounded theory. Thematic saturation was reached after coding 30 interviews; 32 were included. Themes were identified, a codebook was generated, and two researchers coded the transcripts (NLC, DTD) and a third adjudicated any disagreements (EF). Main outcomes measures were defined as themes and the number of participants who expressed a theme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 32 participants interviewed in this study, 59% (n=19) identified as male, 41% (n=13) identified as female, 50% (n=16) identified as Black, 34% (n=11) identified as White, 6% (n=2) identified as Asian. Major themes surrounding coaching included how coaching promoted change in eye drop use, knowledge learned from the coach, feeling accountable to the coach, the coach being accessible, how coaches demonstrated empathy, how the coach collaborated to help people develop a sense of control and efficacy over glaucoma self-management, and how coaches built rapport. Additional themes were program satisfaction, fear of vision loss as a motivator to improve glaucoma self-management, and constructive feedback for the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This qualitative assessment of the SEE personalized glaucoma coaching program demonstrated that high-quality coaching and rapport building may help patients with previously low medication adherence feel more motivated and in control of their glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glaucoma Patient Perspectives on Effective Coaching for Self-Management.\",\"authors\":\"Noah Lee Carey, Danielle Tahira DuPuis, George Lin, Elena Flores, Jamie Mitchell, Deborah Darnley-Fisch, Nauman Imami, Michele Heisler, Kenneth Resnicow, Phalatha McHaney-Conner, Asia Priester, Chamisa MacKenzie, Paula-Anne Newman-Casey\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Precis: </strong>In semi-structured exit interviews, participants in a personalized glaucoma coaching program reported improved self-efficacy in managing their disease. Coaching was frequently cited as catalyst to enhancing medication adherence, emphasizing its role in team-based care.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess patients' experience with coaching to motivate improved adherence to glaucoma self-management.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Participants in the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) personalized glaucoma coaching program completed exit interviews after participating in a six-month coaching program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretivist grounded theory. Thematic saturation was reached after coding 30 interviews; 32 were included. Themes were identified, a codebook was generated, and two researchers coded the transcripts (NLC, DTD) and a third adjudicated any disagreements (EF). Main outcomes measures were defined as themes and the number of participants who expressed a theme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 32 participants interviewed in this study, 59% (n=19) identified as male, 41% (n=13) identified as female, 50% (n=16) identified as Black, 34% (n=11) identified as White, 6% (n=2) identified as Asian. Major themes surrounding coaching included how coaching promoted change in eye drop use, knowledge learned from the coach, feeling accountable to the coach, the coach being accessible, how coaches demonstrated empathy, how the coach collaborated to help people develop a sense of control and efficacy over glaucoma self-management, and how coaches built rapport. Additional themes were program satisfaction, fear of vision loss as a motivator to improve glaucoma self-management, and constructive feedback for the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This qualitative assessment of the SEE personalized glaucoma coaching program demonstrated that high-quality coaching and rapport building may help patients with previously low medication adherence feel more motivated and in control of their glaucoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002593\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在半结构化的离职面谈中,个性化青光眼指导计划的参与者报告说,他们在控制疾病方面的自我效能有所提高。教练经常被认为是提高药物依从性的催化剂,强调其在团队护理中的作用。目的:评价青光眼患者接受指导的经验,以提高患者对青光眼自我管理的依从性。方法和材料:参加支持、教育、授权(SEE)个性化青光眼辅导项目的参与者在参加为期六个月的辅导项目后完成了离职面谈。采访录音并逐字抄写。本研究以诠释主义为基础的理论分析抄本。编码30个访谈后达到主题饱和;32人入选。确定主题,生成代码本,两名研究人员编码转录本(NLC, DTD),第三名研究人员裁决任何分歧(EF)。主要结果测量被定义为主题和表达主题的参与者人数。结果:在本研究采访的32名参与者中,59% (n=19)为男性,41% (n=13)为女性,50% (n=16)为黑人,34% (n=11)为白人,6% (n=2)为亚洲人。围绕教练的主要主题包括教练如何促进眼药水使用的改变,从教练那里学到的知识,对教练负责的感觉,教练是可访问的,教练如何表现出同情,教练如何合作帮助人们建立对青光眼自我管理的控制和有效性,以及教练如何建立融洽的关系。其他主题是项目满意度,对视力丧失的恐惧作为改善青光眼自我管理的动力,以及对项目的建设性反馈。结论:对SEE个性化青光眼指导项目的定性评估表明,高质量的指导和关系的建立可能会帮助以前药物依从性较低的患者感到更有动力并控制他们的青光眼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glaucoma Patient Perspectives on Effective Coaching for Self-Management.

Precis: In semi-structured exit interviews, participants in a personalized glaucoma coaching program reported improved self-efficacy in managing their disease. Coaching was frequently cited as catalyst to enhancing medication adherence, emphasizing its role in team-based care.

Purpose: To assess patients' experience with coaching to motivate improved adherence to glaucoma self-management.

Methods and materials: Participants in the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) personalized glaucoma coaching program completed exit interviews after participating in a six-month coaching program. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretivist grounded theory. Thematic saturation was reached after coding 30 interviews; 32 were included. Themes were identified, a codebook was generated, and two researchers coded the transcripts (NLC, DTD) and a third adjudicated any disagreements (EF). Main outcomes measures were defined as themes and the number of participants who expressed a theme.

Results: Of the 32 participants interviewed in this study, 59% (n=19) identified as male, 41% (n=13) identified as female, 50% (n=16) identified as Black, 34% (n=11) identified as White, 6% (n=2) identified as Asian. Major themes surrounding coaching included how coaching promoted change in eye drop use, knowledge learned from the coach, feeling accountable to the coach, the coach being accessible, how coaches demonstrated empathy, how the coach collaborated to help people develop a sense of control and efficacy over glaucoma self-management, and how coaches built rapport. Additional themes were program satisfaction, fear of vision loss as a motivator to improve glaucoma self-management, and constructive feedback for the program.

Conclusion: This qualitative assessment of the SEE personalized glaucoma coaching program demonstrated that high-quality coaching and rapport building may help patients with previously low medication adherence feel more motivated and in control of their glaucoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信