鉴别滑液白细胞计数诊断慢性假体周围关节感染的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-10-165-2025
Marta Sabater-Martos, Martin Clauss, Ana Ribau, Ricardo Sousa, On Behalf Of The Leukocyte Count Synovial Fluid Working Group For The Unified Pji Definition Task Force
{"title":"鉴别滑液白细胞计数诊断慢性假体周围关节感染的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Marta Sabater-Martos, Martin Clauss, Ana Ribau, Ricardo Sousa, On Behalf Of The Leukocyte Count Synovial Fluid Working Group For The Unified Pji Definition Task Force","doi":"10.5194/jbji-10-165-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication of arthroplasty, lacking a single gold standard diagnostic test. Synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) proportion are widely used diagnostic tools, but their optimal cutoffs remain unclear, particularly for chronic PJI. <b>Material and methods</b>: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 74 studies published between 2000 and 2024. Data on diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios - DORs) of WBC count and PMN proportions were analysed. Sub-group analyses and heterogeneity assessments were performed, and optimal cutoffs for diagnostic accuracy were identified. <b>Results</b>: The meta-analysis revealed a WBC count summary DOR of 58.38 (95 % CI - confidence interval: 48.48-70.32) with an area under the curve (AUC) of the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.952. The PMN proportion showed a DOR of 43.17 (95 % CI: 35.31-52.79) and an AUC of 0.941. Optimal diagnostic thresholds for chronic PJI were WBC count <math><mo>></mo></math> 2600 cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo>></mo></math> 70 %. Rule-in thresholds (specificity <math><mrow><mo>></mo> <mn>95</mn></mrow> </math> %) were WBC count <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 3000 cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 75 %, while rule-out thresholds (sensitivity <math><mo>></mo></math> 95 %) were WBC count <math><mo>≤</mo></math> 1500 cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo>≤</mo></math> 65 %. Confounding conditions such as fractures, inflammatory arthritis, and metal-related reactions reduced test accuracy. <b>Conclusions</b>: Synovial fluid analysis remains a critical diagnostic tool for chronic PJI. Thresholds of WBC count <math><mo><</mo></math> 1500 and <math><mrow><mo>></mo> <mn>3000</mn></mrow> </math>  cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo><</mo></math> 65 % and <math><mrow><mo>></mo> <mn>75</mn></mrow> </math> % provide reliable negative and positive predictive values. A standardized diagnostic framework is essential for addressing remaining controversies and ensuring consistent interpretation across clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"10 3","pages":"165-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential synovial fluid white blood cell count for the diagnosis of chronic peri-prosthetic joint infection - a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Sabater-Martos, Martin Clauss, Ana Ribau, Ricardo Sousa, On Behalf Of The Leukocyte Count Synovial Fluid Working Group For The Unified Pji Definition Task Force\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/jbji-10-165-2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication of arthroplasty, lacking a single gold standard diagnostic test. Synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) proportion are widely used diagnostic tools, but their optimal cutoffs remain unclear, particularly for chronic PJI. <b>Material and methods</b>: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 74 studies published between 2000 and 2024. Data on diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios - DORs) of WBC count and PMN proportions were analysed. Sub-group analyses and heterogeneity assessments were performed, and optimal cutoffs for diagnostic accuracy were identified. <b>Results</b>: The meta-analysis revealed a WBC count summary DOR of 58.38 (95 % CI - confidence interval: 48.48-70.32) with an area under the curve (AUC) of the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.952. The PMN proportion showed a DOR of 43.17 (95 % CI: 35.31-52.79) and an AUC of 0.941. Optimal diagnostic thresholds for chronic PJI were WBC count <math><mo>></mo></math> 2600 cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo>></mo></math> 70 %. Rule-in thresholds (specificity <math><mrow><mo>></mo> <mn>95</mn></mrow> </math> %) were WBC count <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 3000 cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 75 %, while rule-out thresholds (sensitivity <math><mo>></mo></math> 95 %) were WBC count <math><mo>≤</mo></math> 1500 cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo>≤</mo></math> 65 %. Confounding conditions such as fractures, inflammatory arthritis, and metal-related reactions reduced test accuracy. <b>Conclusions</b>: Synovial fluid analysis remains a critical diagnostic tool for chronic PJI. Thresholds of WBC count <math><mo><</mo></math> 1500 and <math><mrow><mo>></mo> <mn>3000</mn></mrow> </math>  cells per microlitre and PMN <math><mo><</mo></math> 65 % and <math><mrow><mo>></mo> <mn>75</mn></mrow> </math> % provide reliable negative and positive predictive values. A standardized diagnostic framework is essential for addressing remaining controversies and ensuring consistent interpretation across clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"165-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-165-2025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-165-2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假体周围关节感染(PJI)是关节置换术的重要并发症,缺乏单一的金标准诊断测试。滑液白细胞(WBC)计数和多形核中性粒细胞(PMN)比例是广泛使用的诊断工具,但其最佳临界值尚不清楚,特别是对于慢性PJI。材料和方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析包括2000年至2024年间发表的74项研究。分析WBC计数和PMN比例的诊断性能数据(敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比- DORs)。进行亚组分析和异质性评估,并确定诊断准确性的最佳截止值。结果:荟萃分析显示,WBC计数汇总DOR为58.38 (95% CI -置信区间:48.48 ~ 70.32),汇总的受试者工作特征曲线曲线下面积(AUC)为0.952。PMN比例DOR为43.17 (95% CI: 35.31-52.79), AUC为0.941。慢性PJI的最佳诊断阈值为WBC计数每微升2600个细胞,PMN计数每微升70%。规则阈值(特异性> 95%)为WBC计数≥3000细胞/微升,PMN≥75%,排除阈值(敏感性> 95%)为WBC计数≤1500细胞/微升,PMN≤65%。诸如骨折、炎症性关节炎和金属相关反应等混杂情况降低了测试的准确性。结论:滑液分析仍然是慢性PJI的重要诊断工具。白细胞计数1500和bbb3000细胞/微升,PMN 65%和>75%的阈值提供可靠的阴性和阳性预测值。标准化的诊断框架对于解决剩余的争议和确保跨临床设置的一致解释至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential synovial fluid white blood cell count for the diagnosis of chronic peri-prosthetic joint infection - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication of arthroplasty, lacking a single gold standard diagnostic test. Synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) proportion are widely used diagnostic tools, but their optimal cutoffs remain unclear, particularly for chronic PJI. Material and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 74 studies published between 2000 and 2024. Data on diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios - DORs) of WBC count and PMN proportions were analysed. Sub-group analyses and heterogeneity assessments were performed, and optimal cutoffs for diagnostic accuracy were identified. Results: The meta-analysis revealed a WBC count summary DOR of 58.38 (95 % CI - confidence interval: 48.48-70.32) with an area under the curve (AUC) of the summarized receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.952. The PMN proportion showed a DOR of 43.17 (95 % CI: 35.31-52.79) and an AUC of 0.941. Optimal diagnostic thresholds for chronic PJI were WBC count > 2600 cells per microlitre and PMN > 70 %. Rule-in thresholds (specificity > 95 %) were WBC count 3000 cells per microlitre and PMN 75 %, while rule-out thresholds (sensitivity > 95 %) were WBC count 1500 cells per microlitre and PMN 65 %. Confounding conditions such as fractures, inflammatory arthritis, and metal-related reactions reduced test accuracy. Conclusions: Synovial fluid analysis remains a critical diagnostic tool for chronic PJI. Thresholds of WBC count < 1500 and > 3000  cells per microlitre and PMN < 65 % and > 75 % provide reliable negative and positive predictive values. A standardized diagnostic framework is essential for addressing remaining controversies and ensuring consistent interpretation across clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信