{"title":"国际生殖细胞癌协进组患者预后良好转移性精原细胞瘤接受降级化疗:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Takahiro Kirisawa, Hiroki Hagimoto, Tomoya Okuno, Ayumu Matsuda, Aiko Maejima, Yasuo Shinoda, Eijiro Nakamura, Motokiyo Komiyama, Hiroyuki Fujimoto, Yoshiyuki Matsui","doi":"10.1111/iju.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the survival outcomes of de-escalation chemotherapy with those of standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) good prognosis metastatic seminoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort of this retrospective, observational, single-center study comprised 35 patients with clinical Stage I (CSI)-relapsed or de novo IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma who had undergone induction chemotherapy at our institution between 2007 and 2021. Patients were allocated to standard or de-escalation therapy groups according to average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of induction chemotherapy: ARDI ≥ 90 and ARDI < 90. Overall and recurrence-free survival were compared between these groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The de-escalation therapy regimen included three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (66.7%). Overall and relapse-free survival of patients undergoing de-escalation therapy and that of patients undergoing standard therapy were comparable. In addition, rates of adverse events, including hearing impairment and peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, were slightly, but not significantly, lower in the de-escalation therapy group than in the standard therapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide a preliminary experimental basis for the development of de-escalation therapy for IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma. If sufficient tumor regression is achieved, de-escalation therapy incorporating three cycles of etoposide/cisplatin therapy could be considered acceptable for patients with relatively low metastatic tumor burdens, such as those with Stage II CSI-relapsed seminoma. Further studies to validate the efficacy of de-escalation therapy are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Patients With International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group Good Prognosis Metastatic Seminoma Undergoing De-Escalation Chemotherapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Kirisawa, Hiroki Hagimoto, Tomoya Okuno, Ayumu Matsuda, Aiko Maejima, Yasuo Shinoda, Eijiro Nakamura, Motokiyo Komiyama, Hiroyuki Fujimoto, Yoshiyuki Matsui\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iju.70118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the survival outcomes of de-escalation chemotherapy with those of standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) good prognosis metastatic seminoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort of this retrospective, observational, single-center study comprised 35 patients with clinical Stage I (CSI)-relapsed or de novo IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma who had undergone induction chemotherapy at our institution between 2007 and 2021. Patients were allocated to standard or de-escalation therapy groups according to average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of induction chemotherapy: ARDI ≥ 90 and ARDI < 90. Overall and recurrence-free survival were compared between these groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The de-escalation therapy regimen included three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (66.7%). Overall and relapse-free survival of patients undergoing de-escalation therapy and that of patients undergoing standard therapy were comparable. In addition, rates of adverse events, including hearing impairment and peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, were slightly, but not significantly, lower in the de-escalation therapy group than in the standard therapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide a preliminary experimental basis for the development of de-escalation therapy for IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma. If sufficient tumor regression is achieved, de-escalation therapy incorporating three cycles of etoposide/cisplatin therapy could be considered acceptable for patients with relatively low metastatic tumor burdens, such as those with Stage II CSI-relapsed seminoma. Further studies to validate the efficacy of de-escalation therapy are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Patients With International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group Good Prognosis Metastatic Seminoma Undergoing De-Escalation Chemotherapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Objective: To compare the survival outcomes of de-escalation chemotherapy with those of standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) good prognosis metastatic seminoma.
Methods: The cohort of this retrospective, observational, single-center study comprised 35 patients with clinical Stage I (CSI)-relapsed or de novo IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma who had undergone induction chemotherapy at our institution between 2007 and 2021. Patients were allocated to standard or de-escalation therapy groups according to average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of induction chemotherapy: ARDI ≥ 90 and ARDI < 90. Overall and recurrence-free survival were compared between these groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.
Results: The de-escalation therapy regimen included three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (66.7%). Overall and relapse-free survival of patients undergoing de-escalation therapy and that of patients undergoing standard therapy were comparable. In addition, rates of adverse events, including hearing impairment and peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, were slightly, but not significantly, lower in the de-escalation therapy group than in the standard therapy group.
Conclusions: Our findings provide a preliminary experimental basis for the development of de-escalation therapy for IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma. If sufficient tumor regression is achieved, de-escalation therapy incorporating three cycles of etoposide/cisplatin therapy could be considered acceptable for patients with relatively low metastatic tumor burdens, such as those with Stage II CSI-relapsed seminoma. Further studies to validate the efficacy of de-escalation therapy are warranted.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.