eus引导下顺行介入经壁和经吻合口塑料支架治疗良性胆肠吻合口狭窄的远期疗效(附视频)。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000112
Gunn Huh, Taehyung Lee, Jinhee Kwon, Ce Hwan Park, John J Vargo, Steven A Edmundowicz, Sunguk Jang, Do Hyun Park
{"title":"eus引导下顺行介入经壁和经吻合口塑料支架治疗良性胆肠吻合口狭窄的远期疗效(附视频)。","authors":"Gunn Huh, Taehyung Lee, Jinhee Kwon, Ce Hwan Park, John J Vargo, Steven A Edmundowicz, Sunguk Jang, Do Hyun Park","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recurrence of benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures (BAS) is common after enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous intervention, or EUS-guided antegrade intervention (EUS-AI). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of EUS-AI with transmural and transanastomotic stenting (TAS) following EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) in BAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with BAS undergoing EUS-AI with or without TAS after failed deep enteroscopy between January 2016 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was BAS recurrence rate after TAS removal; secondary outcomes included technical success of AI, on demand endoscopic procedure (DP) rate, the time to DP, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 38 patients who underwent EUS-HGS, EUS-AI succeeded in 34 (89.5%), and 28 (73.7%) proceeded to TAS. The median follow-up duration for 28 patients with TAS was 53.4 months (IQR, 22.8-85.2). During TAS placement without regular stent change, DP occurred in 43% (12/28) at a median time of 23 months. The 1-year procedure-free rate was 81.2%. After TAS removal (<i>n</i> = 12), with a median stent duration of 21.6 months, there was no BAS recurrence (0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS-AI with indwelling TAS, without regular stent change, may offer promising long-term outcomes for BAS by reducing recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"14 2","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided antegrade intervention with transmural and transanastomotic plastic stenting for benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures (with video).\",\"authors\":\"Gunn Huh, Taehyung Lee, Jinhee Kwon, Ce Hwan Park, John J Vargo, Steven A Edmundowicz, Sunguk Jang, Do Hyun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/eus.0000000000000112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recurrence of benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures (BAS) is common after enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous intervention, or EUS-guided antegrade intervention (EUS-AI). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of EUS-AI with transmural and transanastomotic stenting (TAS) following EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) in BAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with BAS undergoing EUS-AI with or without TAS after failed deep enteroscopy between January 2016 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was BAS recurrence rate after TAS removal; secondary outcomes included technical success of AI, on demand endoscopic procedure (DP) rate, the time to DP, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 38 patients who underwent EUS-HGS, EUS-AI succeeded in 34 (89.5%), and 28 (73.7%) proceeded to TAS. The median follow-up duration for 28 patients with TAS was 53.4 months (IQR, 22.8-85.2). During TAS placement without regular stent change, DP occurred in 43% (12/28) at a median time of 23 months. The 1-year procedure-free rate was 81.2%. After TAS removal (<i>n</i> = 12), with a median stent duration of 21.6 months, there was no BAS recurrence (0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS-AI with indwelling TAS, without regular stent change, may offer promising long-term outcomes for BAS by reducing recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"79-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000112\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在肠镜辅助下的内镜逆行胆管胰造影术(ERCP)、经皮介入治疗或eus引导下的顺行介入治疗(EUS-AI)后,良性胆肠吻合口狭窄(BAS)复发是常见的。本研究评估了EUS-AI联合经壁和经吻合口支架植入术(TAS)在eus引导下肝胃造口术(HGS)治疗BAS的长期疗效。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年6月连续行EUS-AI合并或不合并TAS深肠镜检查失败的BAS患者。主要观察指标为TAS切除后BAS复发率;次要结局包括人工智能的技术成功、按需内镜手术(DP)率、到DP的时间和不良事件。结果:38例EUS-HGS患者中,EUS-AI成功34例(89.5%),28例(73.7%)进入TAS。28例TAS患者的中位随访时间为53.4个月(IQR, 22.8-85.2)。在未定期更换支架的TAS放置组中,DP发生率为43%(12/28),中位时间为23个月。1年免手术率为81.2%。TAS移除后(n = 12),中位支架放置时间为21.6个月,无BAS复发(0%)。结论:EUS-AI留置TAS,无需定期更换支架,可能通过减少复发为BAS提供有希望的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided antegrade intervention with transmural and transanastomotic plastic stenting for benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures (with video).

Background and objectives: Recurrence of benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures (BAS) is common after enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous intervention, or EUS-guided antegrade intervention (EUS-AI). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of EUS-AI with transmural and transanastomotic stenting (TAS) following EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) in BAS.

Methods: Consecutive patients with BAS undergoing EUS-AI with or without TAS after failed deep enteroscopy between January 2016 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was BAS recurrence rate after TAS removal; secondary outcomes included technical success of AI, on demand endoscopic procedure (DP) rate, the time to DP, and adverse events.

Results: Among 38 patients who underwent EUS-HGS, EUS-AI succeeded in 34 (89.5%), and 28 (73.7%) proceeded to TAS. The median follow-up duration for 28 patients with TAS was 53.4 months (IQR, 22.8-85.2). During TAS placement without regular stent change, DP occurred in 43% (12/28) at a median time of 23 months. The 1-year procedure-free rate was 81.2%. After TAS removal (n = 12), with a median stent duration of 21.6 months, there was no BAS recurrence (0%).

Conclusion: EUS-AI with indwelling TAS, without regular stent change, may offer promising long-term outcomes for BAS by reducing recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信