Rongkun Luo, Mingcong Chen, Huanyuan Lu, Rui Zhang, Hongwu Luo, Yinghong Liu, Xunyang Liu, Feizhou Huang, Gang Deng, Zhao Lei
{"title":"eus引导门静脉压力梯度测量评价门静脉高压严重程度:回顾性分析。","authors":"Rongkun Luo, Mingcong Chen, Huanyuan Lu, Rui Zhang, Hongwu Luo, Yinghong Liu, Xunyang Liu, Feizhou Huang, Gang Deng, Zhao Lei","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement has been proposed as a novel direct manometry to quantify portal hypertension. This study aimed to explore the ability of EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate the severity of portal hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical features of patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease who underwent EUS-PPG measurement at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The correlations between the clinical features of portal hypertension and the EUS-PPG measurements were analyzed, and then receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the ability of the EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 197 patients were included in this study. The EUS-PPG measurements varied significantly among patients categorized by gastroesophageal varices, red signs, variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, thrombocytopenia, hypoproteinemia, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, or Child-Pugh grade (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 0.919, 0.847, 0.813, and 0.804, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, the optimal EUS-PPG cutoff values for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 11.5 mm Hg (sensitivity = 80.3%, specificity = 89.5%), 12.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 77.8%, specificity = 76.7%), 15.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 83.1%), and 16.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 76.2%, specificity = 70.1%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-PPG measurement seems to be an effective technique for assessing disease severity and risk of variceal bleeding in patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"14 2","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement for evaluating the severity of portal hypertension: A retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rongkun Luo, Mingcong Chen, Huanyuan Lu, Rui Zhang, Hongwu Luo, Yinghong Liu, Xunyang Liu, Feizhou Huang, Gang Deng, Zhao Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/eus.0000000000000115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement has been proposed as a novel direct manometry to quantify portal hypertension. This study aimed to explore the ability of EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate the severity of portal hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical features of patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease who underwent EUS-PPG measurement at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The correlations between the clinical features of portal hypertension and the EUS-PPG measurements were analyzed, and then receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the ability of the EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 197 patients were included in this study. The EUS-PPG measurements varied significantly among patients categorized by gastroesophageal varices, red signs, variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, thrombocytopenia, hypoproteinemia, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, or Child-Pugh grade (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 0.919, 0.847, 0.813, and 0.804, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, the optimal EUS-PPG cutoff values for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 11.5 mm Hg (sensitivity = 80.3%, specificity = 89.5%), 12.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 77.8%, specificity = 76.7%), 15.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 83.1%), and 16.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 76.2%, specificity = 70.1%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-PPG measurement seems to be an effective technique for assessing disease severity and risk of variceal bleeding in patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"65-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000115\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:eus引导门静脉压力梯度(EUS-PPG)测量已被提出作为一种新的直接测量门静脉高压的方法。本研究旨在探讨EUS-PPG测量评估门静脉高压症严重程度的能力。方法:回顾性分析在单中心行EUS-PPG检测的肝硬化或慢性肝病患者的临床特征。分析门静脉高压症的临床特征与EUS-PPG指标的相关性,并采用患者工作特征曲线评价EUS-PPG指标对疾病严重程度的评价能力。结果:本研究共纳入197例患者。胃食管静脉曲张、红色征候、静脉曲张出血、腹水、肝性脑病、血小板减少、低蛋白血症、凝血酶原时间、国际标准化比值或Child-Pugh分级患者的EUS-PPG测量值差异显著(P < 0.05)。胃食管静脉曲张、失代偿性肝硬化、腹水、近期静脉曲张出血的受者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.919、0.847、0.813、0.804 (P < 0.001)。此外,胃食管静脉曲张、失代偿性肝硬化、腹水和近期静脉曲张出血的最佳EUS-PPG临界值分别为11.5 mm Hg(敏感性= 80.3%,特异性= 89.5%)、12.75 mm Hg(敏感性= 77.8%,特异性= 76.7%)、15.75 mm Hg(敏感性= 66.7%,特异性= 83.1%)和16.75 mm Hg(敏感性= 76.2%,特异性= 70.1%)。结论:EUS-PPG测量似乎是评估肝硬化或慢性肝病患者疾病严重程度和静脉曲张出血风险的有效技术。
EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement for evaluating the severity of portal hypertension: A retrospective analysis.
Background and objectives: EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement has been proposed as a novel direct manometry to quantify portal hypertension. This study aimed to explore the ability of EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate the severity of portal hypertension.
Methods: The clinical features of patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease who underwent EUS-PPG measurement at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The correlations between the clinical features of portal hypertension and the EUS-PPG measurements were analyzed, and then receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the ability of the EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate disease severity.
Results: A total of 197 patients were included in this study. The EUS-PPG measurements varied significantly among patients categorized by gastroesophageal varices, red signs, variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, thrombocytopenia, hypoproteinemia, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, or Child-Pugh grade (P < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 0.919, 0.847, 0.813, and 0.804, respectively (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the optimal EUS-PPG cutoff values for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 11.5 mm Hg (sensitivity = 80.3%, specificity = 89.5%), 12.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 77.8%, specificity = 76.7%), 15.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 83.1%), and 16.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 76.2%, specificity = 70.1%), respectively.
Conclusions: EUS-PPG measurement seems to be an effective technique for assessing disease severity and risk of variceal bleeding in patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease.
期刊介绍:
Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.