揭示16S rRNA基因基因组间变异对引物设计和肠道微生物组分析的影响。

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-05-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1573920
Sirinthorn Sunthornthummas, Rujipat Wasitthankasem, Pimonwan Phokhaphan, Nirinya Sudtachat, Alisa Wilantho, Chumpol Ngamphiw, Wanwisa Chareanchim, Sissades Tongsima
{"title":"揭示16S rRNA基因基因组间变异对引物设计和肠道微生物组分析的影响。","authors":"Sirinthorn Sunthornthummas, Rujipat Wasitthankasem, Pimonwan Phokhaphan, Nirinya Sudtachat, Alisa Wilantho, Chumpol Ngamphiw, Wanwisa Chareanchim, Sissades Tongsima","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1573920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 16S rRNA gene is crucial for bacterial identification, but primer biases and intergenomic variation can compromise its effectiveness, especially in complex ecosystems like the human gut microbiome. This study systematically evaluates 57 commonly used 16S rRNA primer sets through <i>in silico</i> PCR simulations against the SILVA database. We identified three promising primer sets (V3_P3, V3_P7, and V4_P10) that offer balanced coverage and specificity across 20 key genera of the core gut microbiome. Our findings reveal: (1) significant limitations in widely used \"universal\" primers, often failing to capture microbial diversity due to unexpected variability in conserved regions, (2) substantial intergenomic variation, even within traditionally conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene, as demonstrated by Shannon entropy analysis, and (3) discrepancies between intergenomic patterns in NCBI and SILVA databases, highlighting the impact of database choices on taxonomic classification. These results challenge assumptions about 16S rRNA gene conservation and emphasize the need for tailored primer design informed by comprehensive sequence databases. We advocate for a multi-primer strategy to improve coverage and mitigate biases, ultimately enhancing the accuracy and reliability of gut microbiome profiling. This approach has potential applications beyond gut microbiome studies, including animal microbiome research and probiotic community profiling.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1573920"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the impact of 16S rRNA gene intergenomic variation on primer design and gut microbiome profiling.\",\"authors\":\"Sirinthorn Sunthornthummas, Rujipat Wasitthankasem, Pimonwan Phokhaphan, Nirinya Sudtachat, Alisa Wilantho, Chumpol Ngamphiw, Wanwisa Chareanchim, Sissades Tongsima\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1573920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 16S rRNA gene is crucial for bacterial identification, but primer biases and intergenomic variation can compromise its effectiveness, especially in complex ecosystems like the human gut microbiome. This study systematically evaluates 57 commonly used 16S rRNA primer sets through <i>in silico</i> PCR simulations against the SILVA database. We identified three promising primer sets (V3_P3, V3_P7, and V4_P10) that offer balanced coverage and specificity across 20 key genera of the core gut microbiome. Our findings reveal: (1) significant limitations in widely used \\\"universal\\\" primers, often failing to capture microbial diversity due to unexpected variability in conserved regions, (2) substantial intergenomic variation, even within traditionally conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene, as demonstrated by Shannon entropy analysis, and (3) discrepancies between intergenomic patterns in NCBI and SILVA databases, highlighting the impact of database choices on taxonomic classification. These results challenge assumptions about 16S rRNA gene conservation and emphasize the need for tailored primer design informed by comprehensive sequence databases. We advocate for a multi-primer strategy to improve coverage and mitigate biases, ultimately enhancing the accuracy and reliability of gut microbiome profiling. This approach has potential applications beyond gut microbiome studies, including animal microbiome research and probiotic community profiling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1573920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081361/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1573920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1573920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

16S rRNA基因对细菌鉴定至关重要,但引物偏差和基因组间变异会影响其有效性,特别是在像人类肠道微生物组这样的复杂生态系统中。本研究系统地评估了57个常用的16S rRNA引物,并通过SILVA数据库进行了PCR模拟。我们确定了三个有希望的引物组(V3_P3, V3_P7和V4_P10),它们在核心肠道微生物组的20个关键属中提供平衡的覆盖和特异性。我们的研究结果表明:(1)广泛使用的“通用”引物存在明显的局限性,由于保守区域的意外变异,通常无法捕获微生物多样性;(2)Shannon熵分析表明,即使在16S rRNA基因的传统保守区域内,也存在大量的基因组间变异;(3)NCBI和SILVA数据库中基因组间模式的差异,突出了数据库选择对分类分类的影响。这些结果挑战了关于16S rRNA基因保护的假设,并强调了根据综合序列数据库定制引物设计的必要性。我们提倡采用多引物策略来提高覆盖范围和减轻偏差,最终提高肠道微生物组分析的准确性和可靠性。这种方法在肠道微生物组研究之外有潜在的应用,包括动物微生物组研究和益生菌群落分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling the impact of 16S rRNA gene intergenomic variation on primer design and gut microbiome profiling.

The 16S rRNA gene is crucial for bacterial identification, but primer biases and intergenomic variation can compromise its effectiveness, especially in complex ecosystems like the human gut microbiome. This study systematically evaluates 57 commonly used 16S rRNA primer sets through in silico PCR simulations against the SILVA database. We identified three promising primer sets (V3_P3, V3_P7, and V4_P10) that offer balanced coverage and specificity across 20 key genera of the core gut microbiome. Our findings reveal: (1) significant limitations in widely used "universal" primers, often failing to capture microbial diversity due to unexpected variability in conserved regions, (2) substantial intergenomic variation, even within traditionally conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene, as demonstrated by Shannon entropy analysis, and (3) discrepancies between intergenomic patterns in NCBI and SILVA databases, highlighting the impact of database choices on taxonomic classification. These results challenge assumptions about 16S rRNA gene conservation and emphasize the need for tailored primer design informed by comprehensive sequence databases. We advocate for a multi-primer strategy to improve coverage and mitigate biases, ultimately enhancing the accuracy and reliability of gut microbiome profiling. This approach has potential applications beyond gut microbiome studies, including animal microbiome research and probiotic community profiling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信