多成分沟通干预对危重病人家庭成员的支持:一项前后对照研究。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Eyleen Reifarth, Boris Böll, Sascha Köpke, Lisa Altenrath, Jorge Garcia Borrega, Matthias Kochanek, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup
{"title":"多成分沟通干预对危重病人家庭成员的支持:一项前后对照研究。","authors":"Eyleen Reifarth, Boris Böll, Sascha Köpke, Lisa Altenrath, Jorge Garcia Borrega, Matthias Kochanek, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of a communication intervention for family members of ICU patients, assessing comprehension of patient information within the first week of ICU admission, symptoms of anxiety and depression at 90 days post-ICU discharge, and corresponding risk factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Controlled pre-post study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic tertiary care center in Germany, between January 2023 and July 2024.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>ICU patients' family members.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The intervention comprised a communication manual and skills training for ICU physicians and nurses as well as a supplementary information brochure for ICU patients' families.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>Within the first week of ICU admission, data of 140 family members (70 control/70 intervention group) were collected via in-person interview on site using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and a validated questionnaire assessing information comprehension. Overall, in the control and intervention group, 46 (65.7%) and 31 (44.3%) family members, respectively, could not state the patients' diagnosis, therapy, or prognosis following a family-physician conversation in the ICU (p = 0.011; r = 0.215). On day 90, 67 (95.7%) and 64 (91.4%) family members in the control and intervention group, respectively, participated in the follow-up telephone interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding symptoms of anxiety or depression (p > 0.268). The family members' baseline anxiety and depression scores, their age, and their comprehension of the patients' main reason for ICU admission were identified as predictors of increased anxiety and depression scores at 90-day follow-up. In addition, higher education was associated with increased anxiety symptoms at 90-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention improved the family members' level of comprehension but did not decrease their symptoms of anxiety or depression at 90 days post-ICU discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicomponent Communication Intervention to Support Family Members of the Critically Ill: A Controlled Pre-Post Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eyleen Reifarth, Boris Böll, Sascha Köpke, Lisa Altenrath, Jorge Garcia Borrega, Matthias Kochanek, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of a communication intervention for family members of ICU patients, assessing comprehension of patient information within the first week of ICU admission, symptoms of anxiety and depression at 90 days post-ICU discharge, and corresponding risk factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Controlled pre-post study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic tertiary care center in Germany, between January 2023 and July 2024.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>ICU patients' family members.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The intervention comprised a communication manual and skills training for ICU physicians and nurses as well as a supplementary information brochure for ICU patients' families.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>Within the first week of ICU admission, data of 140 family members (70 control/70 intervention group) were collected via in-person interview on site using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and a validated questionnaire assessing information comprehension. Overall, in the control and intervention group, 46 (65.7%) and 31 (44.3%) family members, respectively, could not state the patients' diagnosis, therapy, or prognosis following a family-physician conversation in the ICU (p = 0.011; r = 0.215). On day 90, 67 (95.7%) and 64 (91.4%) family members in the control and intervention group, respectively, participated in the follow-up telephone interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding symptoms of anxiety or depression (p > 0.268). The family members' baseline anxiety and depression scores, their age, and their comprehension of the patients' main reason for ICU admission were identified as predictors of increased anxiety and depression scores at 90-day follow-up. In addition, higher education was associated with increased anxiety symptoms at 90-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention improved the family members' level of comprehension but did not decrease their symptoms of anxiety or depression at 90 days post-ICU discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006714\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨沟通干预对ICU患者家属的影响,评估患者入院第一周内对患者信息的理解程度、出院后90天焦虑抑郁症状及相关危险因素。设计:前后对照研究。环境:在2023年1月至2024年7月期间,德国的单一学术三级医疗中心。对象:ICU患者家属。干预措施:干预措施包括针对ICU医生和护士的沟通手册和技能培训,以及针对ICU患者家属的补充信息手册。测量及主要结果:在ICU入院第一周内,采用医院焦虑抑郁量表和有效的信息理解评估问卷,通过现场访谈收集140名家庭成员(对照组70名/干预组70名)的数据。总体而言,在对照组和干预组中,分别有46名(65.7%)和31名(44.3%)家庭成员在ICU与家庭医生交谈后不能说出患者的诊断、治疗或预后(p = 0.011;R = 0.215)。第90天,对照组和干预组分别有67名(95.7%)和64名(91.4%)家庭成员参加了随访电话访谈。在焦虑或抑郁症状方面,两组间无统计学差异(p < 0.268)。在90天的随访中,家庭成员的基线焦虑和抑郁评分、他们的年龄以及他们对患者进入ICU的主要原因的理解被确定为焦虑和抑郁评分增加的预测因素。此外,在90天的随访中,高等教育与焦虑症状的增加有关。结论:干预提高了家庭成员的理解水平,但没有减少他们在icu出院后90天的焦虑或抑郁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicomponent Communication Intervention to Support Family Members of the Critically Ill: A Controlled Pre-Post Study.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of a communication intervention for family members of ICU patients, assessing comprehension of patient information within the first week of ICU admission, symptoms of anxiety and depression at 90 days post-ICU discharge, and corresponding risk factors.

Design: Controlled pre-post study.

Setting: Single academic tertiary care center in Germany, between January 2023 and July 2024.

Subjects: ICU patients' family members.

Interventions: The intervention comprised a communication manual and skills training for ICU physicians and nurses as well as a supplementary information brochure for ICU patients' families.

Measurement and main results: Within the first week of ICU admission, data of 140 family members (70 control/70 intervention group) were collected via in-person interview on site using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and a validated questionnaire assessing information comprehension. Overall, in the control and intervention group, 46 (65.7%) and 31 (44.3%) family members, respectively, could not state the patients' diagnosis, therapy, or prognosis following a family-physician conversation in the ICU (p = 0.011; r = 0.215). On day 90, 67 (95.7%) and 64 (91.4%) family members in the control and intervention group, respectively, participated in the follow-up telephone interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding symptoms of anxiety or depression (p > 0.268). The family members' baseline anxiety and depression scores, their age, and their comprehension of the patients' main reason for ICU admission were identified as predictors of increased anxiety and depression scores at 90-day follow-up. In addition, higher education was associated with increased anxiety symptoms at 90-day follow-up.

Conclusions: The intervention improved the family members' level of comprehension but did not decrease their symptoms of anxiety or depression at 90 days post-ICU discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信