体外冲击波治疗勃起功能障碍:重新思考研究设计、实施和分析。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Janak Desai, Eric Huyghe, Gayle D Maffulli, Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer, Jessica Tittelmeier, Christoph Schmitz
{"title":"体外冲击波治疗勃起功能障碍:重新思考研究设计、实施和分析。","authors":"Janak Desai, Eric Huyghe, Gayle D Maffulli, Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer, Jessica Tittelmeier, Christoph Schmitz","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) presents a challenging paradox. While numerous clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have been published, indicating a substantial body of evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of ESWT, significant questions remain. Notably, the American Urological Association (AUA) continues to classify ESWT for ED as investigational (Evidence Level: Grade C), suggesting that the true therapeutic effect of ESWT may differ considerably from current estimates. This review aims to critically assess the evidence and propose strategies to address this unresolved discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>We systematically searched two electronic databases (PubMed and Ovid/Embase) and published systematic reviews on ESWT for ED and compiled a systematic literature review and meta-analysis based on 87 relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>There is clear evidence that ESWT for ED is effective and can therefore be a valuable treatment modality in the management of ED.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Current assessments of ESWT for ED as investigational by, e.g. the AUA may not stem from a lack of clinical studies, insufficient related basic science, or an inadequate number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Instead, the deficits lie in the area of the scientific quality of the clinical studies published to date.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>We hypothesize that this unfortunate situation will only change if the following aspects are rigorously considered in future clinical studies on ESWT for ED: adequate characterization and reporting of extracorporeal shock waves, appropriate handling of missing data and intercurrent events, and comprehensive classification of ESWT in the overall context of the available treatment options for ED.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>We are convinced that the consistent implementation of these aspects will significantly contribute to establishing ESWT as the first truly regenerative therapy in the management of ED. This overall aim justifies the corresponding efforts for the benefit of our patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"154 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: rethinking study design, implementation, and analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Janak Desai, Eric Huyghe, Gayle D Maffulli, Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer, Jessica Tittelmeier, Christoph Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bmb/ldaf004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) presents a challenging paradox. While numerous clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have been published, indicating a substantial body of evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of ESWT, significant questions remain. Notably, the American Urological Association (AUA) continues to classify ESWT for ED as investigational (Evidence Level: Grade C), suggesting that the true therapeutic effect of ESWT may differ considerably from current estimates. This review aims to critically assess the evidence and propose strategies to address this unresolved discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>We systematically searched two electronic databases (PubMed and Ovid/Embase) and published systematic reviews on ESWT for ED and compiled a systematic literature review and meta-analysis based on 87 relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>There is clear evidence that ESWT for ED is effective and can therefore be a valuable treatment modality in the management of ED.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Current assessments of ESWT for ED as investigational by, e.g. the AUA may not stem from a lack of clinical studies, insufficient related basic science, or an inadequate number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Instead, the deficits lie in the area of the scientific quality of the clinical studies published to date.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>We hypothesize that this unfortunate situation will only change if the following aspects are rigorously considered in future clinical studies on ESWT for ED: adequate characterization and reporting of extracorporeal shock waves, appropriate handling of missing data and intercurrent events, and comprehensive classification of ESWT in the overall context of the available treatment options for ED.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>We are convinced that the consistent implementation of these aspects will significantly contribute to establishing ESWT as the first truly regenerative therapy in the management of ED. This overall aim justifies the corresponding efforts for the benefit of our patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaf004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)提出了一个具有挑战性的悖论。虽然已经发表了大量的临床研究、系统综述和荟萃分析,表明有大量证据支持ESWT的有效性和安全性,但仍存在重大问题。值得注意的是,美国泌尿学会(AUA)继续将ESWT治疗ED归类为研究性(证据水平:C级),这表明ESWT的真正治疗效果可能与目前的估计有很大不同。本综述旨在批判性地评估证据,并提出解决这一未解决差异的策略。资料来源:我们系统检索了PubMed和Ovid/Embase两个电子数据库,发表了ESWT for ED的系统综述,并基于87项相关研究进行了系统文献综述和meta分析。一致的领域:有明确的证据表明,ESWT治疗ED是有效的,因此可以成为ED管理中有价值的治疗方式。争议的领域:目前对ESWT治疗ED的评估是研究性的,例如AUA可能不是由于缺乏临床研究,相关基础科学不足,或者系统评价和元分析的数量不足。相反,缺陷在于迄今为止发表的临床研究的科学质量。成长要点:我们假设,只有在未来的ED ESWT临床研究中严格考虑以下方面,这种不幸的情况才会改变:充分表征和报告体外冲击波,适当处理缺失的数据和并发事件,以及在ED可用治疗方案的总体背景下对ESWT进行全面分类,及时开展研究。我们相信,这些方面的持续实施将大大有助于将ESWT建立为ED管理中第一个真正的再生疗法。为了患者的利益,这一总体目标证明了相应的努力是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: rethinking study design, implementation, and analysis.

Introduction: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) presents a challenging paradox. While numerous clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have been published, indicating a substantial body of evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of ESWT, significant questions remain. Notably, the American Urological Association (AUA) continues to classify ESWT for ED as investigational (Evidence Level: Grade C), suggesting that the true therapeutic effect of ESWT may differ considerably from current estimates. This review aims to critically assess the evidence and propose strategies to address this unresolved discrepancy.

Source of data: We systematically searched two electronic databases (PubMed and Ovid/Embase) and published systematic reviews on ESWT for ED and compiled a systematic literature review and meta-analysis based on 87 relevant studies.

Areas of agreement: There is clear evidence that ESWT for ED is effective and can therefore be a valuable treatment modality in the management of ED.

Areas of controversy: Current assessments of ESWT for ED as investigational by, e.g. the AUA may not stem from a lack of clinical studies, insufficient related basic science, or an inadequate number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Instead, the deficits lie in the area of the scientific quality of the clinical studies published to date.

Growing points: We hypothesize that this unfortunate situation will only change if the following aspects are rigorously considered in future clinical studies on ESWT for ED: adequate characterization and reporting of extracorporeal shock waves, appropriate handling of missing data and intercurrent events, and comprehensive classification of ESWT in the overall context of the available treatment options for ED.

Areas timely for developing research: We are convinced that the consistent implementation of these aspects will significantly contribute to establishing ESWT as the first truly regenerative therapy in the management of ED. This overall aim justifies the corresponding efforts for the benefit of our patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信