引言:什么是漂亮的词语?

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Jennifer Syvertsen PhD, MPH, Juliet McMullin PhD
{"title":"引言:什么是漂亮的词语?","authors":"Jennifer Syvertsen PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Juliet McMullin PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Funding agencies and institutions are increasingly requiring researchers to involve communities and make their work more broadly accessible. The problem is that researchers new to health equity research, and sometimes even people who have engaged in this work for a while, may not sufficiently appreciate the challenges and systemic institutional transformations that must occur to achieve equity. To make pretty words meaningful requires a return to the transformative power and potential that was originally imbued in the concept of equity. The implementation of pretty words as a process that requires a relational framework and a commitment beyond ink on paper is central to our intervention. This special section of Annals of Anthropological Practice opens up a critical dialogue about “pretty words,” or concepts like “community-engaged research” and “diversity” that win grants and check the boxes for inclusion, but risk becoming hollow without ongoing conversations between researchers and communities. As anthropologists who study health, we are both skeptical and appreciative of the “pretty words” that characterize our efforts toward developing interdisciplinary research that seeks to build equity and address community health concerns. The power of pretty words can only be activated through reflection that leads to action, but this requires a commitment beyond the institutional expectations and individual rewards of research as usual. The essays in this special section cover diverse topics, but all are conjoined in their pursuit of not just critiquing pretty words, but outlining meaningful ways forward to reclaim the radical potential embedded in these concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: What are pretty words?\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Syvertsen PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Juliet McMullin PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/napa.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Funding agencies and institutions are increasingly requiring researchers to involve communities and make their work more broadly accessible. The problem is that researchers new to health equity research, and sometimes even people who have engaged in this work for a while, may not sufficiently appreciate the challenges and systemic institutional transformations that must occur to achieve equity. To make pretty words meaningful requires a return to the transformative power and potential that was originally imbued in the concept of equity. The implementation of pretty words as a process that requires a relational framework and a commitment beyond ink on paper is central to our intervention. This special section of Annals of Anthropological Practice opens up a critical dialogue about “pretty words,” or concepts like “community-engaged research” and “diversity” that win grants and check the boxes for inclusion, but risk becoming hollow without ongoing conversations between researchers and communities. As anthropologists who study health, we are both skeptical and appreciative of the “pretty words” that characterize our efforts toward developing interdisciplinary research that seeks to build equity and address community health concerns. The power of pretty words can only be activated through reflection that leads to action, but this requires a commitment beyond the institutional expectations and individual rewards of research as usual. The essays in this special section cover diverse topics, but all are conjoined in their pursuit of not just critiquing pretty words, but outlining meaningful ways forward to reclaim the radical potential embedded in these concepts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资助机构和机构越来越多地要求研究人员让社区参与进来,使他们的工作更容易获得。问题是,刚接触卫生公平研究的研究人员,有时甚至是从事这项工作已有一段时间的人,可能没有充分认识到实现公平所必须面临的挑战和系统性的制度变革。要使漂亮的词语有意义,就需要回归最初蕴含在平等概念中的变革力量和潜力。实现漂亮的文字作为一个过程,需要一个关系框架和一种超越纸上墨水的承诺,这是我们干预的核心。《人类学实践年鉴》的这一特殊章节开启了一场关于“漂亮词语”或“社区参与研究”和“多样性”等概念的批判性对话,这些概念赢得了资助,也符合纳入标准,但如果没有研究人员和社区之间的持续对话,它们就有可能变得空洞。作为研究健康的人类学家,我们既怀疑又欣赏那些描述我们努力发展跨学科研究的“漂亮字眼”,这些研究旨在建立公平和解决社区健康问题。漂亮话语的力量只能通过引发行动的反思来激活,但这需要一种超越机构期望和个人研究回报的承诺。这个特别部分的文章涵盖了各种各样的主题,但所有的文章都是在追求不仅仅是批评漂亮的词语,而是勾勒出有意义的前进方式,以收回这些概念中蕴含的激进潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Introduction: What are pretty words?

Introduction: What are pretty words?

Introduction: What are pretty words?

Introduction: What are pretty words?

Funding agencies and institutions are increasingly requiring researchers to involve communities and make their work more broadly accessible. The problem is that researchers new to health equity research, and sometimes even people who have engaged in this work for a while, may not sufficiently appreciate the challenges and systemic institutional transformations that must occur to achieve equity. To make pretty words meaningful requires a return to the transformative power and potential that was originally imbued in the concept of equity. The implementation of pretty words as a process that requires a relational framework and a commitment beyond ink on paper is central to our intervention. This special section of Annals of Anthropological Practice opens up a critical dialogue about “pretty words,” or concepts like “community-engaged research” and “diversity” that win grants and check the boxes for inclusion, but risk becoming hollow without ongoing conversations between researchers and communities. As anthropologists who study health, we are both skeptical and appreciative of the “pretty words” that characterize our efforts toward developing interdisciplinary research that seeks to build equity and address community health concerns. The power of pretty words can only be activated through reflection that leads to action, but this requires a commitment beyond the institutional expectations and individual rewards of research as usual. The essays in this special section cover diverse topics, but all are conjoined in their pursuit of not just critiquing pretty words, but outlining meaningful ways forward to reclaim the radical potential embedded in these concepts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信