Yanan Wu, Ruiyang Zhang, Andrew S. MacDougall, Dashuan Tian, Jinsong Wang, Shuli Niu
{"title":"湿地恢复有效但不足以补偿土壤退化造成的有机碳损失","authors":"Yanan Wu, Ruiyang Zhang, Andrew S. MacDougall, Dashuan Tian, Jinsong Wang, Shuli Niu","doi":"10.1111/geb.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness of wetland restoration in reversing soil organic carbon (SOC) loss from degradation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>1996–2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Wetland.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a global meta-analysis to compare SOC levels in restored, degraded, and natural wetlands across different restoration approaches and wetland types and to examine the dynamic trajectories of SOC recovery and the influence of climatic and edaphic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that passive restoration increased SOC in degraded sites by 141%, compared to an 8% increase from active restoration. Restored inland wetlands showed an increase in SOC of 118%, while coastal wetlands showed a limited improvement of 5%, in comparison with degraded wetlands. Increases in SOC primarily occurred within the first 10 years after restoration and then levelled off. That being said, SOC accumulation in restored wetlands rarely approached the levels found in natural wetlands, highlighting the importance of protecting wetlands from degradation for SOC targets. Key factors for wetland SOC restoration were total soil nitrogen and mean annual temperature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We conclude that wetland restoration is effective but insufficient to compensate for SOC losses from degradation. This study provides valuable insights for climate change mitigation through wetland restoration, supporting the goals of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and the Paris Agreement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wetland Restoration Is Effective but Insufficient to Compensate for Soil Organic Carbon Losses From Degradation\",\"authors\":\"Yanan Wu, Ruiyang Zhang, Andrew S. MacDougall, Dashuan Tian, Jinsong Wang, Shuli Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the effectiveness of wetland restoration in reversing soil organic carbon (SOC) loss from degradation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>1996–2023.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Wetland.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a global meta-analysis to compare SOC levels in restored, degraded, and natural wetlands across different restoration approaches and wetland types and to examine the dynamic trajectories of SOC recovery and the influence of climatic and edaphic factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that passive restoration increased SOC in degraded sites by 141%, compared to an 8% increase from active restoration. Restored inland wetlands showed an increase in SOC of 118%, while coastal wetlands showed a limited improvement of 5%, in comparison with degraded wetlands. Increases in SOC primarily occurred within the first 10 years after restoration and then levelled off. That being said, SOC accumulation in restored wetlands rarely approached the levels found in natural wetlands, highlighting the importance of protecting wetlands from degradation for SOC targets. Key factors for wetland SOC restoration were total soil nitrogen and mean annual temperature.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conclude that wetland restoration is effective but insufficient to compensate for SOC losses from degradation. This study provides valuable insights for climate change mitigation through wetland restoration, supporting the goals of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and the Paris Agreement.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70063\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70063\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wetland Restoration Is Effective but Insufficient to Compensate for Soil Organic Carbon Losses From Degradation
Aim
To assess the effectiveness of wetland restoration in reversing soil organic carbon (SOC) loss from degradation.
Location
Global.
Time Period
1996–2023.
Major Taxa Studied
Wetland.
Methods
We conducted a global meta-analysis to compare SOC levels in restored, degraded, and natural wetlands across different restoration approaches and wetland types and to examine the dynamic trajectories of SOC recovery and the influence of climatic and edaphic factors.
Results
We found that passive restoration increased SOC in degraded sites by 141%, compared to an 8% increase from active restoration. Restored inland wetlands showed an increase in SOC of 118%, while coastal wetlands showed a limited improvement of 5%, in comparison with degraded wetlands. Increases in SOC primarily occurred within the first 10 years after restoration and then levelled off. That being said, SOC accumulation in restored wetlands rarely approached the levels found in natural wetlands, highlighting the importance of protecting wetlands from degradation for SOC targets. Key factors for wetland SOC restoration were total soil nitrogen and mean annual temperature.
Main Conclusions
We conclude that wetland restoration is effective but insufficient to compensate for SOC losses from degradation. This study provides valuable insights for climate change mitigation through wetland restoration, supporting the goals of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and the Paris Agreement.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.