{"title":"包容","authors":"Grecia L. Perez","doi":"10.1111/napa.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a <i>People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy</i> and a companion <i>People's Dictionary</i> to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion\",\"authors\":\"Grecia L. Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/napa.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a <i>People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy</i> and a companion <i>People's Dictionary</i> to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
经济包容通常被认为是历史上边缘化社区的理想目标,但对这一目标的批判性解读提出了重要问题:谁被包括在内和/或被排除在外?在任何经济发展过程中,决定包容性形式的权力关系是什么?在这篇文章中,我回顾了我与Just San Bernardino (Just SB)的社区参与研究。Just SB是一个由9个社区和工会组织组成的联盟,在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后成立,旨在重新定义实现真正形式的经济包容的举措。这项研究记录了长期存在的社区挫折,以及社区、资助组织和政府机构之间对优先级的不匹配理解。这项研究促使Just SB制定了包容性经济的人民计划和配套的人民词典,为共同理解关键术语及其目标奠定了基础。反思这一基层研究过程,我认为,如果我们要产生有意义的变革,经济包容性没有单一的定义,而是必须建立在多种社会世界观的基础上。
Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy and a companion People's Dictionary to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.