包容

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Grecia L. Perez
{"title":"包容","authors":"Grecia L. Perez","doi":"10.1111/napa.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a <i>People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy</i> and a companion <i>People's Dictionary</i> to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion\",\"authors\":\"Grecia L. Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/napa.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a <i>People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy</i> and a companion <i>People's Dictionary</i> to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济包容通常被认为是历史上边缘化社区的理想目标,但对这一目标的批判性解读提出了重要问题:谁被包括在内和/或被排除在外?在任何经济发展过程中,决定包容性形式的权力关系是什么?在这篇文章中,我回顾了我与Just San Bernardino (Just SB)的社区参与研究。Just SB是一个由9个社区和工会组织组成的联盟,在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后成立,旨在重新定义实现真正形式的经济包容的举措。这项研究记录了长期存在的社区挫折,以及社区、资助组织和政府机构之间对优先级的不匹配理解。这项研究促使Just SB制定了包容性经济的人民计划和配套的人民词典,为共同理解关键术语及其目标奠定了基础。反思这一基层研究过程,我认为,如果我们要产生有意义的变革,经济包容性没有单一的定义,而是必须建立在多种社会世界观的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inclusion

Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy and a companion People's Dictionary to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信