研究

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Ann Marie Cheney PhD
{"title":"研究","authors":"Ann Marie Cheney PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Terms like community engaged research and community-based participatory research risk losing their meaning and significance in health equity research. This article calls attention to potential overuse of such terms in applied health research with historically marginalized populations. Reflecting on essays that advocate for decolonizing research, this article considers ways to engage in research that does not enact epistemicide or the erasure of diverse ways of doing research and knowledge generation, as well as encourages the “deep work” of relationship and trust building. The author argues that research should be an ongoing and reflexive practice that works to dismantle the legacy of colonialism that has dictated, for too long, who does science and research and who generates knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research\",\"authors\":\"Ann Marie Cheney PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/napa.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Terms like community engaged research and community-based participatory research risk losing their meaning and significance in health equity research. This article calls attention to potential overuse of such terms in applied health research with historically marginalized populations. Reflecting on essays that advocate for decolonizing research, this article considers ways to engage in research that does not enact epistemicide or the erasure of diverse ways of doing research and knowledge generation, as well as encourages the “deep work” of relationship and trust building. The author argues that research should be an ongoing and reflexive practice that works to dismantle the legacy of colonialism that has dictated, for too long, who does science and research and who generates knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.70009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社区参与研究和社区参与研究等术语在卫生公平研究中可能失去其意义和重要性。这篇文章呼吁注意这些术语在历史上被边缘化人群的应用卫生研究中可能被过度使用。反思那些提倡非殖民化研究的文章,本文考虑了参与研究的方式,而不是制定知识灭绝或消除各种研究和知识生成方式,以及鼓励建立关系和信任的“深度工作”。作者认为,研究应该是一种持续的、反思性的实践,旨在消除长期以来决定谁从事科学研究、谁创造知识的殖民主义遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research

Terms like community engaged research and community-based participatory research risk losing their meaning and significance in health equity research. This article calls attention to potential overuse of such terms in applied health research with historically marginalized populations. Reflecting on essays that advocate for decolonizing research, this article considers ways to engage in research that does not enact epistemicide or the erasure of diverse ways of doing research and knowledge generation, as well as encourages the “deep work” of relationship and trust building. The author argues that research should be an ongoing and reflexive practice that works to dismantle the legacy of colonialism that has dictated, for too long, who does science and research and who generates knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信