{"title":"几何下的隧道(或者瞬子知道它们的代数)","authors":"Dmitry Galakhov, Alexei Morozov","doi":"10.1007/JHEP05(2025)132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the tight binding model with multiple degenerate vacua we might treat wave function overlaps as instanton tunnelings between different wells (vacua). An amplitude for such a tunneling process might be constructed as <span>\\( {\\textrm{T}}_{i\\to j}\\sim {e}^{-{S}_{\\textrm{inst}}}{\\textbf{v}}_j^{+}{\\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \\)</span>, where there is canonical instanton action suppression, and <span>\\( {\\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \\)</span> annihilates a particle in the <i>i</i><sup>th</sup> vacuum, whereas <span>\\( {\\textbf{v}}_j^{+} \\)</span> creates a particle in the <i>j</i><sup>th</sup> vacuum. Adiabatic change of the wells leads to a Berry-phase evolution of the couplings, which is described by the zero-curvature Gauss-Manin connection, i.e. by a quantum <i>R</i>-matrix. Zero-curvature is actually a consequence of level repulsion or topological protection, and its implication is the Yang-Baxter relation for the <i>R</i>-matrices. In the simplest case the story is pure Abelian and not very exciting. But when the model becomes more involved, incorporates supersymmetry, gauge and other symmetries, such amplitudes obtain more intricate structures. Operators <span>\\( {\\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \\)</span>, <span>\\( {\\textbf{v}}_j^{+} \\)</span> might also evolve from ordinary Heisenberg operators into a more sophisticated algebraic object — a “tunneling algebra”. The result for the tunneling algebra would depend strongly on geometry of the QFT we started with, and, unfortunately, at the moment we are unable to solve the reverse engineering problem. In this note we revise few successful cases of the aforementioned correspondence: quantum algebras <i>U</i><sub><i>q</i></sub>(<span>\\( \\mathfrak{g} \\)</span>) and affine Yangians <i>Y</i>(<span>\\( \\hat{\\mathfrak{g}} \\)</span>). For affine Yangians we demonstrate explicitly how instantons “perform” equivariant integrals over associated quiver moduli spaces appearing in the alternative geometric construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of High Energy Physics","volume":"2025 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/JHEP05(2025)132.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tunnels under geometries (or instantons know their algebras)\",\"authors\":\"Dmitry Galakhov, Alexei Morozov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/JHEP05(2025)132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the tight binding model with multiple degenerate vacua we might treat wave function overlaps as instanton tunnelings between different wells (vacua). An amplitude for such a tunneling process might be constructed as <span>\\\\( {\\\\textrm{T}}_{i\\\\to j}\\\\sim {e}^{-{S}_{\\\\textrm{inst}}}{\\\\textbf{v}}_j^{+}{\\\\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \\\\)</span>, where there is canonical instanton action suppression, and <span>\\\\( {\\\\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \\\\)</span> annihilates a particle in the <i>i</i><sup>th</sup> vacuum, whereas <span>\\\\( {\\\\textbf{v}}_j^{+} \\\\)</span> creates a particle in the <i>j</i><sup>th</sup> vacuum. Adiabatic change of the wells leads to a Berry-phase evolution of the couplings, which is described by the zero-curvature Gauss-Manin connection, i.e. by a quantum <i>R</i>-matrix. Zero-curvature is actually a consequence of level repulsion or topological protection, and its implication is the Yang-Baxter relation for the <i>R</i>-matrices. In the simplest case the story is pure Abelian and not very exciting. But when the model becomes more involved, incorporates supersymmetry, gauge and other symmetries, such amplitudes obtain more intricate structures. Operators <span>\\\\( {\\\\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\( {\\\\textbf{v}}_j^{+} \\\\)</span> might also evolve from ordinary Heisenberg operators into a more sophisticated algebraic object — a “tunneling algebra”. The result for the tunneling algebra would depend strongly on geometry of the QFT we started with, and, unfortunately, at the moment we are unable to solve the reverse engineering problem. In this note we revise few successful cases of the aforementioned correspondence: quantum algebras <i>U</i><sub><i>q</i></sub>(<span>\\\\( \\\\mathfrak{g} \\\\)</span>) and affine Yangians <i>Y</i>(<span>\\\\( \\\\hat{\\\\mathfrak{g}} \\\\)</span>). For affine Yangians we demonstrate explicitly how instantons “perform” equivariant integrals over associated quiver moduli spaces appearing in the alternative geometric construction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of High Energy Physics\",\"volume\":\"2025 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/JHEP05(2025)132.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of High Energy Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP05(2025)132\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of High Energy Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP05(2025)132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tunnels under geometries (or instantons know their algebras)
In the tight binding model with multiple degenerate vacua we might treat wave function overlaps as instanton tunnelings between different wells (vacua). An amplitude for such a tunneling process might be constructed as \( {\textrm{T}}_{i\to j}\sim {e}^{-{S}_{\textrm{inst}}}{\textbf{v}}_j^{+}{\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \), where there is canonical instanton action suppression, and \( {\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \) annihilates a particle in the ith vacuum, whereas \( {\textbf{v}}_j^{+} \) creates a particle in the jth vacuum. Adiabatic change of the wells leads to a Berry-phase evolution of the couplings, which is described by the zero-curvature Gauss-Manin connection, i.e. by a quantum R-matrix. Zero-curvature is actually a consequence of level repulsion or topological protection, and its implication is the Yang-Baxter relation for the R-matrices. In the simplest case the story is pure Abelian and not very exciting. But when the model becomes more involved, incorporates supersymmetry, gauge and other symmetries, such amplitudes obtain more intricate structures. Operators \( {\textbf{v}}_i^{-} \), \( {\textbf{v}}_j^{+} \) might also evolve from ordinary Heisenberg operators into a more sophisticated algebraic object — a “tunneling algebra”. The result for the tunneling algebra would depend strongly on geometry of the QFT we started with, and, unfortunately, at the moment we are unable to solve the reverse engineering problem. In this note we revise few successful cases of the aforementioned correspondence: quantum algebras Uq(\( \mathfrak{g} \)) and affine Yangians Y(\( \hat{\mathfrak{g}} \)). For affine Yangians we demonstrate explicitly how instantons “perform” equivariant integrals over associated quiver moduli spaces appearing in the alternative geometric construction.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of High Energy Physics (JHEP) is to ensure fast and efficient online publication tools to the scientific community, while keeping that community in charge of every aspect of the peer-review and publication process in order to ensure the highest quality standards in the journal.
Consequently, the Advisory and Editorial Boards, composed of distinguished, active scientists in the field, jointly establish with the Scientific Director the journal''s scientific policy and ensure the scientific quality of accepted articles.
JHEP presently encompasses the following areas of theoretical and experimental physics:
Collider Physics
Underground and Large Array Physics
Quantum Field Theory
Gauge Field Theories
Symmetries
String and Brane Theory
General Relativity and Gravitation
Supersymmetry
Mathematical Methods of Physics
Mostly Solvable Models
Astroparticles
Statistical Field Theories
Mostly Weak Interactions
Mostly Strong Interactions
Quantum Field Theory (phenomenology)
Strings and Branes
Phenomenological Aspects of Supersymmetry
Mostly Strong Interactions (phenomenology).