爱尔兰内科和外科住院病人和保健工作人员对预先保健指示的态度和知识

Q3 Medicine
M. Redahan, C. Rock, M. Grudzien, B.D. Kelly
{"title":"爱尔兰内科和外科住院病人和保健工作人员对预先保健指示的态度和知识","authors":"M. Redahan,&nbsp;C. Rock,&nbsp;M. Grudzien,&nbsp;B.D. Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Advance healthcare directives (AHDs) are commonly discussed as a way to enhance patient autonomy but are rarely used, often owing to lack of awareness. This study aimed to assess knowledge of, and attitudes towards, AHDs in hospital inpatients and staff in Ireland one year after a new system of AHDs was introduced into law.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We surveyed knowledge of and attitudes towards AHDs among 120 inpatients and 102 staff at a Dublin hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No patient had made an AHD and few had heard of them (11.7%), but two thirds (65.8%) would make an AHD if supported by their healthcare provider, most commonly requesting specific treatments (70.0%) and place of care (62.5%). Majorities felt that somebody else should be involved in writing the AHD (96.7%) and that healthcare professionals would respect AHDs (85.0%). Future willingness to make an AHD was associated with younger age and greater education. A majority (80.4%) of staff members had heard of AHDs and almost half (45.1%) had cared for a patient with one. Vast majorities felt that AHDs were a good idea (97.1%), especially those who had cared for a patient with an AHD. Majorities of staff (84.3%) and patients (61.7%) would prefer an advance care plan that was not legally binding but included the patient’s will and preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a need for greater education about AHDs, but also respect for the preference of both patients and staff for advance care plans that are not legally binding but include the patient’s will and preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes and knowledge relating to advance healthcare directives among medical and surgical inpatients and healthcare staff in Ireland\",\"authors\":\"M. Redahan,&nbsp;C. Rock,&nbsp;M. Grudzien,&nbsp;B.D. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Advance healthcare directives (AHDs) are commonly discussed as a way to enhance patient autonomy but are rarely used, often owing to lack of awareness. This study aimed to assess knowledge of, and attitudes towards, AHDs in hospital inpatients and staff in Ireland one year after a new system of AHDs was introduced into law.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We surveyed knowledge of and attitudes towards AHDs among 120 inpatients and 102 staff at a Dublin hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No patient had made an AHD and few had heard of them (11.7%), but two thirds (65.8%) would make an AHD if supported by their healthcare provider, most commonly requesting specific treatments (70.0%) and place of care (62.5%). Majorities felt that somebody else should be involved in writing the AHD (96.7%) and that healthcare professionals would respect AHDs (85.0%). Future willingness to make an AHD was associated with younger age and greater education. A majority (80.4%) of staff members had heard of AHDs and almost half (45.1%) had cared for a patient with one. Vast majorities felt that AHDs were a good idea (97.1%), especially those who had cared for a patient with an AHD. Majorities of staff (84.3%) and patients (61.7%) would prefer an advance care plan that was not legally binding but included the patient’s will and preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a need for greater education about AHDs, but also respect for the preference of both patients and staff for advance care plans that are not legally binding but include the patient’s will and preferences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预先医疗保健指令(AHDs)通常被认为是增强患者自主权的一种方式,但很少被使用,通常是由于缺乏意识。这项研究的目的是评估爱尔兰医院住院病人和工作人员对心脏病的知识和态度,在新的心脏病制度被引入法律一年后。方法调查了都柏林某医院120名住院患者和102名工作人员对心脏瓣膜病的知识和态度。结果没有患者做出AHD,很少有人听说过AHD(11.7%),但三分之二(65.8%)的患者在医疗服务提供者的支持下会做出AHD,最常见的是要求特定治疗(70.0%)和护理地点(62.5%)。大多数人认为应该有其他人参与撰写AHD(96.7%),医疗保健专业人员应该尊重AHD(85.0%)。未来做出AHD的意愿与年龄更小和受教育程度更高有关。大多数(80.4%)工作人员听说过心脏骤停,几乎一半(45.1%)的工作人员照顾过患有心脏骤停的病人。绝大多数人(97.1%)认为AHD是一个好主意,尤其是那些照顾过AHD患者的人。大多数工作人员(84.3%)和患者(61.7%)更喜欢不具有法律约束力但包含患者意愿和偏好的预先护理计划。结论需要加强对心脏疾病的教育,但也要尊重患者和工作人员对不具有法律约束力但包含患者意愿和偏好的预先护理计划的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes and knowledge relating to advance healthcare directives among medical and surgical inpatients and healthcare staff in Ireland

Background

Advance healthcare directives (AHDs) are commonly discussed as a way to enhance patient autonomy but are rarely used, often owing to lack of awareness. This study aimed to assess knowledge of, and attitudes towards, AHDs in hospital inpatients and staff in Ireland one year after a new system of AHDs was introduced into law.

Methodology

We surveyed knowledge of and attitudes towards AHDs among 120 inpatients and 102 staff at a Dublin hospital.

Results

No patient had made an AHD and few had heard of them (11.7%), but two thirds (65.8%) would make an AHD if supported by their healthcare provider, most commonly requesting specific treatments (70.0%) and place of care (62.5%). Majorities felt that somebody else should be involved in writing the AHD (96.7%) and that healthcare professionals would respect AHDs (85.0%). Future willingness to make an AHD was associated with younger age and greater education. A majority (80.4%) of staff members had heard of AHDs and almost half (45.1%) had cared for a patient with one. Vast majorities felt that AHDs were a good idea (97.1%), especially those who had cared for a patient with an AHD. Majorities of staff (84.3%) and patients (61.7%) would prefer an advance care plan that was not legally binding but included the patient’s will and preferences.

Conclusion

There is a need for greater education about AHDs, but also respect for the preference of both patients and staff for advance care plans that are not legally binding but include the patient’s will and preferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信