Zhuorong Du , Miaomiao Fu , Shuwen Zheng , Xingrun Li , Jingsi Chen , Jiafu Li
{"title":"饮用水中新出现的消毒副产物鉴定的最新综述:揭示色谱的作用","authors":"Zhuorong Du , Miaomiao Fu , Shuwen Zheng , Xingrun Li , Jingsi Chen , Jiafu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2025.e00267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the identified disinfection byproducts (DBPs) do not fully explain the overall toxicity of disinfected drinking water, accurately identifying highly toxic unknown DBPs is essential for understanding the adverse effects of water disinfection. Analytical methods are selected based on the distinct properties of DBPs. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CNKI databases to identify emerging DBPs first reported in the past five years, collecting data on their identification and occurrence. While earlier studies primarily employed gas chromatography (GC) related methods, recent years have seen a substantial shift toward liquid chromatography (LC) related methods. Among the emerging DBPs reported over the past five years, GC related methods have identified four classes, whereas LC related methods have identified 26 classes. Furthermore, innovative techniques such as supercritical fluid chromatography-quadrupole-time of flight-tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) have been introduced to enhance DBP identification. The reported concentrations of individual emerging DBPs are mostly in the range of 10<sup>1</sup> ng/L, typically only one-thousandth to one-tenth of those of regulated and priority DBPs, which generally exist at μg/L levels. This review also discusses future developments in the accurate identification of unknown DBPs and explores strategies to enhance drinking water safety, informed by insights gained from the emerging DBPs identified in the past five years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article e00267"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A time-updated review on the identification of emerging disinfection byproducts in drinking water: Revealing the role of chromatography\",\"authors\":\"Zhuorong Du , Miaomiao Fu , Shuwen Zheng , Xingrun Li , Jingsi Chen , Jiafu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teac.2025.e00267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since the identified disinfection byproducts (DBPs) do not fully explain the overall toxicity of disinfected drinking water, accurately identifying highly toxic unknown DBPs is essential for understanding the adverse effects of water disinfection. Analytical methods are selected based on the distinct properties of DBPs. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CNKI databases to identify emerging DBPs first reported in the past five years, collecting data on their identification and occurrence. While earlier studies primarily employed gas chromatography (GC) related methods, recent years have seen a substantial shift toward liquid chromatography (LC) related methods. Among the emerging DBPs reported over the past five years, GC related methods have identified four classes, whereas LC related methods have identified 26 classes. Furthermore, innovative techniques such as supercritical fluid chromatography-quadrupole-time of flight-tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) have been introduced to enhance DBP identification. The reported concentrations of individual emerging DBPs are mostly in the range of 10<sup>1</sup> ng/L, typically only one-thousandth to one-tenth of those of regulated and priority DBPs, which generally exist at μg/L levels. This review also discusses future developments in the accurate identification of unknown DBPs and explores strategies to enhance drinking water safety, informed by insights gained from the emerging DBPs identified in the past five years.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158825000108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158825000108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于已确定的消毒副产物(DBPs)并不能完全解释消毒饮用水的总体毒性,因此准确识别高毒性未知DBPs对于了解水消毒的不良影响至关重要。根据dbp的不同性质选择分析方法。对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、b谷歌Scholar和CNKI数据库进行文献检索,以确定近五年来首次报道的新兴dbp,收集其识别和发生的数据。虽然早期的研究主要采用气相色谱(GC)相关方法,但近年来已经看到了向液相色谱(LC)相关方法的实质性转变。在过去五年中报告的新兴dbp中,GC相关方法鉴定了4类,LC相关方法鉴定了26类。此外,还引入了超临界流体色谱-四极杆飞行时间串联质谱(SFC-Q-TOF-MS/MS)等创新技术来提高DBP的鉴定。报告的单个新出现dbp的浓度大多在101 ng/L范围内,通常仅为通常存在于μg/L水平的受调节和优先dbp浓度的千分之一至十分之一。本综述还讨论了在准确识别未知dbp方面的未来发展,并根据从过去五年中发现的新dbp中获得的见解,探讨了加强饮用水安全的战略。
A time-updated review on the identification of emerging disinfection byproducts in drinking water: Revealing the role of chromatography
Since the identified disinfection byproducts (DBPs) do not fully explain the overall toxicity of disinfected drinking water, accurately identifying highly toxic unknown DBPs is essential for understanding the adverse effects of water disinfection. Analytical methods are selected based on the distinct properties of DBPs. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CNKI databases to identify emerging DBPs first reported in the past five years, collecting data on their identification and occurrence. While earlier studies primarily employed gas chromatography (GC) related methods, recent years have seen a substantial shift toward liquid chromatography (LC) related methods. Among the emerging DBPs reported over the past five years, GC related methods have identified four classes, whereas LC related methods have identified 26 classes. Furthermore, innovative techniques such as supercritical fluid chromatography-quadrupole-time of flight-tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) have been introduced to enhance DBP identification. The reported concentrations of individual emerging DBPs are mostly in the range of 101 ng/L, typically only one-thousandth to one-tenth of those of regulated and priority DBPs, which generally exist at μg/L levels. This review also discusses future developments in the accurate identification of unknown DBPs and explores strategies to enhance drinking water safety, informed by insights gained from the emerging DBPs identified in the past five years.
期刊介绍:
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.