提高疏散效率:调查行李如何影响出口策略和人群动态

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zhigang Shang , Jun Zhang , Zhigang Shi , Xiaolian Li , Weiguo Song
{"title":"提高疏散效率:调查行李如何影响出口策略和人群动态","authors":"Zhigang Shang ,&nbsp;Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhigang Shi ,&nbsp;Xiaolian Li ,&nbsp;Weiguo Song","doi":"10.1016/j.simpat.2025.103142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Luggage carriers as an important part of pedestrians in public transportation hubs may greatly affect the crowd movement especially in emergencies, but have been seldom considered in existing evacuation models. In this work, we adjusted the spatial structure of pedestrians and the forces from luggage to simulate luggage-laden pedestrians. By introducing an exit selection model and rules for luggage-laden pedestrians, it can reflect the exit selection strategy of the crowd with luggage. The effectiveness and performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulation results with experimental data and those from other evacuation models. Subsequently, the model was used to simulate the evacuation process in different scenarios. It was found that setting a dedicated exit for luggage-laden pedestrians is unnecessary and will exacerbate the degree of conflict when there is no crowd diversion before the exit. As the passenger flow increases, the impact of luggage on crowd evacuation becomes more and more obvious, resulting in a longer evacuation time for higher proportion of luggage under the same pedestrian numbers. When the passenger flow is high, smaller distance between two exits will reduce the evacuation efficiency. Besides, frequent change on the expected exit during the movement process is not conducive to crowd evacuation. If pedestrians can complete the exit selection at a position from where the distance to the exit is larger than a certain value, the total evacuation time can be reduced. The larger the passenger flow is, the farther this distance should be. It is hoped that the relevant findings of this work can provide guidance and reference for public safety and emergency management in transportation hubs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49518,"journal":{"name":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 103142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing evacuation efficiency: Investigating how luggage influences exit strategies and crowd dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Zhigang Shang ,&nbsp;Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhigang Shi ,&nbsp;Xiaolian Li ,&nbsp;Weiguo Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.simpat.2025.103142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Luggage carriers as an important part of pedestrians in public transportation hubs may greatly affect the crowd movement especially in emergencies, but have been seldom considered in existing evacuation models. In this work, we adjusted the spatial structure of pedestrians and the forces from luggage to simulate luggage-laden pedestrians. By introducing an exit selection model and rules for luggage-laden pedestrians, it can reflect the exit selection strategy of the crowd with luggage. The effectiveness and performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulation results with experimental data and those from other evacuation models. Subsequently, the model was used to simulate the evacuation process in different scenarios. It was found that setting a dedicated exit for luggage-laden pedestrians is unnecessary and will exacerbate the degree of conflict when there is no crowd diversion before the exit. As the passenger flow increases, the impact of luggage on crowd evacuation becomes more and more obvious, resulting in a longer evacuation time for higher proportion of luggage under the same pedestrian numbers. When the passenger flow is high, smaller distance between two exits will reduce the evacuation efficiency. Besides, frequent change on the expected exit during the movement process is not conducive to crowd evacuation. If pedestrians can complete the exit selection at a position from where the distance to the exit is larger than a certain value, the total evacuation time can be reduced. The larger the passenger flow is, the farther this distance should be. It is hoped that the relevant findings of this work can provide guidance and reference for public safety and emergency management in transportation hubs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory\",\"volume\":\"142 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X25000772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X25000772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行李搬运者作为公共交通枢纽行人的重要组成部分,在突发事件中对人群的运动影响较大,但在现有的疏散模型中很少考虑。在这项工作中,我们调整了行人的空间结构和行李的力量来模拟负重的行人。通过引入带行李行人的出口选择模型和规则,可以反映带行李人群的出口选择策略。通过与实验数据和其他疏散模型的模拟结果进行比较,评价了该模型的有效性和性能。随后,利用该模型对不同场景下的疏散过程进行了模拟。研究发现,没有必要为携带行李的行人设置一个专用出口,在出口前没有人群分流的情况下,会加剧冲突程度。随着客流的增加,行李对人群疏散的影响越来越明显,导致相同行人数量下,行李比例越高,疏散时间越长。客流较大时,两个出口之间的距离越小,疏散效率越低。此外,在移动过程中,期望出口的频繁变化也不利于人群的疏散。如果行人能够在距离出口的距离大于某一值的位置完成出口选择,则可以减少总疏散时间。客流越大,这个距离应该越远。希望本研究的相关发现能够为交通枢纽的公共安全和应急管理提供指导和参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing evacuation efficiency: Investigating how luggage influences exit strategies and crowd dynamics
Luggage carriers as an important part of pedestrians in public transportation hubs may greatly affect the crowd movement especially in emergencies, but have been seldom considered in existing evacuation models. In this work, we adjusted the spatial structure of pedestrians and the forces from luggage to simulate luggage-laden pedestrians. By introducing an exit selection model and rules for luggage-laden pedestrians, it can reflect the exit selection strategy of the crowd with luggage. The effectiveness and performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the simulation results with experimental data and those from other evacuation models. Subsequently, the model was used to simulate the evacuation process in different scenarios. It was found that setting a dedicated exit for luggage-laden pedestrians is unnecessary and will exacerbate the degree of conflict when there is no crowd diversion before the exit. As the passenger flow increases, the impact of luggage on crowd evacuation becomes more and more obvious, resulting in a longer evacuation time for higher proportion of luggage under the same pedestrian numbers. When the passenger flow is high, smaller distance between two exits will reduce the evacuation efficiency. Besides, frequent change on the expected exit during the movement process is not conducive to crowd evacuation. If pedestrians can complete the exit selection at a position from where the distance to the exit is larger than a certain value, the total evacuation time can be reduced. The larger the passenger flow is, the farther this distance should be. It is hoped that the relevant findings of this work can provide guidance and reference for public safety and emergency management in transportation hubs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The journal Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory provides a forum for original, high-quality papers dealing with any aspect of systems simulation and modelling. The journal aims at being a reference and a powerful tool to all those professionally active and/or interested in the methods and applications of simulation. Submitted papers will be peer reviewed and must significantly contribute to modelling and simulation in general or use modelling and simulation in application areas. Paper submission is solicited on: • theoretical aspects of modelling and simulation including formal modelling, model-checking, random number generators, sensitivity analysis, variance reduction techniques, experimental design, meta-modelling, methods and algorithms for validation and verification, selection and comparison procedures etc.; • methodology and application of modelling and simulation in any area, including computer systems, networks, real-time and embedded systems, mobile and intelligent agents, manufacturing and transportation systems, management, engineering, biomedical engineering, economics, ecology and environment, education, transaction handling, etc.; • simulation languages and environments including those, specific to distributed computing, grid computing, high performance computers or computer networks, etc.; • distributed and real-time simulation, simulation interoperability; • tools for high performance computing simulation, including dedicated architectures and parallel computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信