两条战线上的战争:性别政权和缅甸和斯里兰卡的民族主义国家

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Melissa Johnston , Jayanthi T. Lingham
{"title":"两条战线上的战争:性别政权和缅甸和斯里兰卡的民族主义国家","authors":"Melissa Johnston ,&nbsp;Jayanthi T. Lingham","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Critical scholars have long noted gender ideologies, gender symbolism, and gendered discourses in nationalist and ethnonationalist politics. Building on these insights and employing a historical materialist framework, the article explores the effects of the ethnonationalist <em>state</em> on gender. Specifically, it asks what impact does the ethnonationalist state form have on gender power relations? The article argues that ethnonationalist states’ central logic lies in the reproduction of racialized social forces and, as a result, it strategically buttresses and depletes social forces through the weaponization of social reproduction. Because ethnonationalist states aim to undermine social reproduction of subordinated ethnic groups, this manifests in intense violence directed at women. The article demonstrates this argument using data generated from qualitative time-use studies conducted in Myanmar and Sri Lanka—two ethnonationalist states characterized by violent ethnic cleavages, comparable variations in conflict geographies, and the political mobilization of Buddhism. It connects gender-based violence across the home-front and the warfront, revealing patriarchal violence as crucial to the project of war. In conclusion, the article suggests that academics and practitioners seeking to understand and contend with the ethnonationalist state would benefit from a clear-eyed assessment of one of its central logics: the reproduction of the racialized gender order.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103340"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"War on two fronts: Gender regimes and the ethnonationalist state in Myanmar and Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Johnston ,&nbsp;Jayanthi T. Lingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Critical scholars have long noted gender ideologies, gender symbolism, and gendered discourses in nationalist and ethnonationalist politics. Building on these insights and employing a historical materialist framework, the article explores the effects of the ethnonationalist <em>state</em> on gender. Specifically, it asks what impact does the ethnonationalist state form have on gender power relations? The article argues that ethnonationalist states’ central logic lies in the reproduction of racialized social forces and, as a result, it strategically buttresses and depletes social forces through the weaponization of social reproduction. Because ethnonationalist states aim to undermine social reproduction of subordinated ethnic groups, this manifests in intense violence directed at women. The article demonstrates this argument using data generated from qualitative time-use studies conducted in Myanmar and Sri Lanka—two ethnonationalist states characterized by violent ethnic cleavages, comparable variations in conflict geographies, and the political mobilization of Buddhism. It connects gender-based violence across the home-front and the warfront, revealing patriarchal violence as crucial to the project of war. In conclusion, the article suggests that academics and practitioners seeking to understand and contend with the ethnonationalist state would benefit from a clear-eyed assessment of one of its central logics: the reproduction of the racialized gender order.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Geography\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825000721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825000721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

批判学者早就注意到民族主义和民族民族主义政治中的性别意识形态、性别象征主义和性别话语。在这些见解的基础上,本文采用历史唯物主义的框架,探讨了民族民族主义国家对性别的影响。具体来说,它问的是民族民族主义国家形式对性别权力关系有什么影响?本文认为,民族民族主义国家的核心逻辑在于种族化的社会力量的再生产,因此,它通过社会再生产的武器化,在战略上支撑和消耗社会力量。因为民族主义国家的目标是破坏从属种族群体的社会再生产,这表现在针对妇女的强烈暴力上。本文使用在缅甸和斯里兰卡进行的定性时间使用研究得出的数据来证明这一论点,这两个民族主义国家的特点是暴力的种族分裂,冲突地理的可比变化以及佛教的政治动员。它将家庭前线和战争前线的性别暴力联系起来,揭示了父权暴力对战争项目至关重要。总之,本文认为,试图理解和应对民族民族主义国家的学者和实践者将受益于对其核心逻辑之一的清晰评估:种族化的性别秩序的再生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
War on two fronts: Gender regimes and the ethnonationalist state in Myanmar and Sri Lanka
Critical scholars have long noted gender ideologies, gender symbolism, and gendered discourses in nationalist and ethnonationalist politics. Building on these insights and employing a historical materialist framework, the article explores the effects of the ethnonationalist state on gender. Specifically, it asks what impact does the ethnonationalist state form have on gender power relations? The article argues that ethnonationalist states’ central logic lies in the reproduction of racialized social forces and, as a result, it strategically buttresses and depletes social forces through the weaponization of social reproduction. Because ethnonationalist states aim to undermine social reproduction of subordinated ethnic groups, this manifests in intense violence directed at women. The article demonstrates this argument using data generated from qualitative time-use studies conducted in Myanmar and Sri Lanka—two ethnonationalist states characterized by violent ethnic cleavages, comparable variations in conflict geographies, and the political mobilization of Buddhism. It connects gender-based violence across the home-front and the warfront, revealing patriarchal violence as crucial to the project of war. In conclusion, the article suggests that academics and practitioners seeking to understand and contend with the ethnonationalist state would benefit from a clear-eyed assessment of one of its central logics: the reproduction of the racialized gender order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信