{"title":"农业生态系统产量缺口建模的综合见解:定义、理论框架和多维视角(综述)","authors":"Behnam Kamkar , Gerrit Hoogenboom , Parisa Alizadeh-Dehkordi , Pooya Aalaee Bazkiaee , Alireza Nehbandani","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>The yield gap—the difference between potential and actual yield—represents a fundamental challenge in agriculture. Closing this gap is crucial for increasing the productivity of arable land, thereby ensuring sustainable food security without expanding the agricultural footprint. This study explores the concept of the yield gap and its critical role in boosting crop production per unit area, a strategy essential for meeting the global food demand in the face of a growing population.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to review and analyze methodologies for assessing the yield gap, highlighting their significance in improving agricultural productivity. The focus is on evaluating the strengths, limitations, and applications of various yield gap assessment methods, with a particular emphasis on the Global Yield Gap Atlas (GYGA) protocol to enhance the relevance and applicability of findings across different agricultural systems.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Five widely utilized yield gap assessment methods were thoroughly reviewed, including crop simulation models (CSMs) and satellite imagery techniques. The study examines the methodologies, strengths, limitations, and notable applications of these methods globally. It also discusses the integration of advanced data collection and analysis techniques to overcome challenges such as data scarcity and inconsistencies in results.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The study identifies key challenges in yield gap research, including the scarcity of reliable data and the inconsistencies from different methodologies producing divergent results under similar conditions. These issues pose significant challenges for agricultural decision-makers and farmers, potentially reducing the practical utility of yield gap analyses. The study emphasizes the need for improved standardization and methodological integration to provide robust and actionable insights. It also highlights the evolution of yield gap methodologies to address climate change challenges and the need for effective adaptation and mitigation strategies. A cross-method comparison also revealed consistent key yield gap determinants.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the history, methodology, strengths, and weaknesses of various yield gap assessment methods. It discusses their evolution and the challenges ahead, offering guidance on integrating these methodologies to drive sustainable agricultural practices. The findings contribute to global food security by informing better decision-making in agriculture amidst ongoing environmental and socio-economic pressures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 104392"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive insights into modeling yield gap in agroecosystems: Definitions, theoretical framework, and multidimensional perspectives (a review)\",\"authors\":\"Behnam Kamkar , Gerrit Hoogenboom , Parisa Alizadeh-Dehkordi , Pooya Aalaee Bazkiaee , Alireza Nehbandani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>The yield gap—the difference between potential and actual yield—represents a fundamental challenge in agriculture. Closing this gap is crucial for increasing the productivity of arable land, thereby ensuring sustainable food security without expanding the agricultural footprint. This study explores the concept of the yield gap and its critical role in boosting crop production per unit area, a strategy essential for meeting the global food demand in the face of a growing population.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to review and analyze methodologies for assessing the yield gap, highlighting their significance in improving agricultural productivity. The focus is on evaluating the strengths, limitations, and applications of various yield gap assessment methods, with a particular emphasis on the Global Yield Gap Atlas (GYGA) protocol to enhance the relevance and applicability of findings across different agricultural systems.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Five widely utilized yield gap assessment methods were thoroughly reviewed, including crop simulation models (CSMs) and satellite imagery techniques. The study examines the methodologies, strengths, limitations, and notable applications of these methods globally. It also discusses the integration of advanced data collection and analysis techniques to overcome challenges such as data scarcity and inconsistencies in results.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The study identifies key challenges in yield gap research, including the scarcity of reliable data and the inconsistencies from different methodologies producing divergent results under similar conditions. These issues pose significant challenges for agricultural decision-makers and farmers, potentially reducing the practical utility of yield gap analyses. The study emphasizes the need for improved standardization and methodological integration to provide robust and actionable insights. It also highlights the evolution of yield gap methodologies to address climate change challenges and the need for effective adaptation and mitigation strategies. A cross-method comparison also revealed consistent key yield gap determinants.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the history, methodology, strengths, and weaknesses of various yield gap assessment methods. It discusses their evolution and the challenges ahead, offering guidance on integrating these methodologies to drive sustainable agricultural practices. The findings contribute to global food security by informing better decision-making in agriculture amidst ongoing environmental and socio-economic pressures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001325\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comprehensive insights into modeling yield gap in agroecosystems: Definitions, theoretical framework, and multidimensional perspectives (a review)
CONTEXT
The yield gap—the difference between potential and actual yield—represents a fundamental challenge in agriculture. Closing this gap is crucial for increasing the productivity of arable land, thereby ensuring sustainable food security without expanding the agricultural footprint. This study explores the concept of the yield gap and its critical role in boosting crop production per unit area, a strategy essential for meeting the global food demand in the face of a growing population.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to review and analyze methodologies for assessing the yield gap, highlighting their significance in improving agricultural productivity. The focus is on evaluating the strengths, limitations, and applications of various yield gap assessment methods, with a particular emphasis on the Global Yield Gap Atlas (GYGA) protocol to enhance the relevance and applicability of findings across different agricultural systems.
METHODS
Five widely utilized yield gap assessment methods were thoroughly reviewed, including crop simulation models (CSMs) and satellite imagery techniques. The study examines the methodologies, strengths, limitations, and notable applications of these methods globally. It also discusses the integration of advanced data collection and analysis techniques to overcome challenges such as data scarcity and inconsistencies in results.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The study identifies key challenges in yield gap research, including the scarcity of reliable data and the inconsistencies from different methodologies producing divergent results under similar conditions. These issues pose significant challenges for agricultural decision-makers and farmers, potentially reducing the practical utility of yield gap analyses. The study emphasizes the need for improved standardization and methodological integration to provide robust and actionable insights. It also highlights the evolution of yield gap methodologies to address climate change challenges and the need for effective adaptation and mitigation strategies. A cross-method comparison also revealed consistent key yield gap determinants.
SIGNIFICANCE
This comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the history, methodology, strengths, and weaknesses of various yield gap assessment methods. It discusses their evolution and the challenges ahead, offering guidance on integrating these methodologies to drive sustainable agricultural practices. The findings contribute to global food security by informing better decision-making in agriculture amidst ongoing environmental and socio-economic pressures.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.