生物炭基肥料提高了烟草生产中的碳中和和净生态系统经济效益

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fanghu Sun , Xiaopeng Deng , Ying Jiao , Jie Li , Jun Li , Huiying Xing , Wenjie Tong , Erdeng Ma , Yali Zhang , Zhengqin Xiong
{"title":"生物炭基肥料提高了烟草生产中的碳中和和净生态系统经济效益","authors":"Fanghu Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaopeng Deng ,&nbsp;Ying Jiao ,&nbsp;Jie Li ,&nbsp;Jun Li ,&nbsp;Huiying Xing ,&nbsp;Wenjie Tong ,&nbsp;Erdeng Ma ,&nbsp;Yali Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhengqin Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biochar has great potential to advance carbon neutrality and net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB), dual priorities critical for global sustainability. Nevertheless, scarce studies have comprehensively assessed the carbon footprint and NEEB based on life cycle assessment (LCA) as well as field crop production. An integrative investigation of five strategies was set up through field experiments: (1) chemical compound fertilizer (CF), (2) biochar-based fertilizer (BF), and (3–5) biochar application rates of 10 (NB10), 20 (NB20), and 30 (NB30) t ha<sup>−1</sup> with equal nitrogen inputs in a typical tobacco field with no N fertilizer or biochar as CK. The results demonstrated that biochar amendments (NB10, NB20, and NB30) achieved dose-dependent net negative carbon footprint although they intensified N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 118.7–321.7 % (p &lt; 0.05) as compared with the CF. Moreover, the NB10 strategy reconciled environmental-economic objectives with better NEEB, but the NB20 and NB30 strategies depressed NEEB despite achieving carbon negativity. Importantly, the BF strategy optimally increased NEEB (by 3.9 %, p &lt; 0.05), improved tobacco quality (by 13.9 %), and decreased the carbon footprint (by 22.1 % and 25.9 % on the yield-scaled and income-scaled, respectively, p &lt; 0.05) compared to the CF. Energy consumption was the primary contributor to carbon emissions, accounting for 69.1–83.1 % among all sources based on the LCA framework. Thus, biochar-based fertilizer and optimized biochar amendment strategies lowered the carbon footprint and enhanced NEEB for sustainable production, surpassing conventional local practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"387 ","pages":"Article 125862"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochar-based fertilizer enhances carbon neutrality and net ecosystem economic benefit in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L) production\",\"authors\":\"Fanghu Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaopeng Deng ,&nbsp;Ying Jiao ,&nbsp;Jie Li ,&nbsp;Jun Li ,&nbsp;Huiying Xing ,&nbsp;Wenjie Tong ,&nbsp;Erdeng Ma ,&nbsp;Yali Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhengqin Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biochar has great potential to advance carbon neutrality and net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB), dual priorities critical for global sustainability. Nevertheless, scarce studies have comprehensively assessed the carbon footprint and NEEB based on life cycle assessment (LCA) as well as field crop production. An integrative investigation of five strategies was set up through field experiments: (1) chemical compound fertilizer (CF), (2) biochar-based fertilizer (BF), and (3–5) biochar application rates of 10 (NB10), 20 (NB20), and 30 (NB30) t ha<sup>−1</sup> with equal nitrogen inputs in a typical tobacco field with no N fertilizer or biochar as CK. The results demonstrated that biochar amendments (NB10, NB20, and NB30) achieved dose-dependent net negative carbon footprint although they intensified N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 118.7–321.7 % (p &lt; 0.05) as compared with the CF. Moreover, the NB10 strategy reconciled environmental-economic objectives with better NEEB, but the NB20 and NB30 strategies depressed NEEB despite achieving carbon negativity. Importantly, the BF strategy optimally increased NEEB (by 3.9 %, p &lt; 0.05), improved tobacco quality (by 13.9 %), and decreased the carbon footprint (by 22.1 % and 25.9 % on the yield-scaled and income-scaled, respectively, p &lt; 0.05) compared to the CF. Energy consumption was the primary contributor to carbon emissions, accounting for 69.1–83.1 % among all sources based on the LCA framework. Thus, biochar-based fertilizer and optimized biochar amendment strategies lowered the carbon footprint and enhanced NEEB for sustainable production, surpassing conventional local practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"387 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725018389\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725018389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物炭在促进碳中和和净生态系统经济效益(NEEB)方面具有巨大潜力,这是对全球可持续性至关重要的双重优先事项。然而,很少有研究基于生命周期评估(LCA)和大田作物产量对碳足迹和NEEB进行综合评估。在不施氮肥和不施生物炭的典型烟田中,通过田间试验,建立了5种策略的综合研究:(1)化学复合肥(CF)、(2)生物炭基肥(BF)和(3-5)生物炭的施氮量分别为10 (NB10)、20 (NB20)和30 (NB30) t / h - 1,施氮量相同。结果表明,生物炭改性剂(NB10、NB20和NB30)虽然使N2O排放增加了118.7 - 321.7%,但实现了剂量依赖的净负碳足迹(p <;此外,NB10策略使环境经济目标与较好的NEEB相协调,而NB20和NB30策略虽然实现了碳负性,但却抑制了NEEB。重要的是,BF策略最优地增加了NEEB (3.9%, p <;0.05),提高了烟草品质(提高了13.9%),减少了碳足迹(在产量规模和收入规模上分别降低了22.1%和25.9%),p <;在LCA框架下,能源消费是碳排放的主要来源,占所有来源的69.1 - 83.1%。因此,生物炭基肥料和优化的生物炭修正策略降低了碳足迹,增强了NEEB的可持续生产,超越了传统的当地做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biochar-based fertilizer enhances carbon neutrality and net ecosystem economic benefit in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L) production
Biochar has great potential to advance carbon neutrality and net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB), dual priorities critical for global sustainability. Nevertheless, scarce studies have comprehensively assessed the carbon footprint and NEEB based on life cycle assessment (LCA) as well as field crop production. An integrative investigation of five strategies was set up through field experiments: (1) chemical compound fertilizer (CF), (2) biochar-based fertilizer (BF), and (3–5) biochar application rates of 10 (NB10), 20 (NB20), and 30 (NB30) t ha−1 with equal nitrogen inputs in a typical tobacco field with no N fertilizer or biochar as CK. The results demonstrated that biochar amendments (NB10, NB20, and NB30) achieved dose-dependent net negative carbon footprint although they intensified N2O emissions by 118.7–321.7 % (p < 0.05) as compared with the CF. Moreover, the NB10 strategy reconciled environmental-economic objectives with better NEEB, but the NB20 and NB30 strategies depressed NEEB despite achieving carbon negativity. Importantly, the BF strategy optimally increased NEEB (by 3.9 %, p < 0.05), improved tobacco quality (by 13.9 %), and decreased the carbon footprint (by 22.1 % and 25.9 % on the yield-scaled and income-scaled, respectively, p < 0.05) compared to the CF. Energy consumption was the primary contributor to carbon emissions, accounting for 69.1–83.1 % among all sources based on the LCA framework. Thus, biochar-based fertilizer and optimized biochar amendment strategies lowered the carbon footprint and enhanced NEEB for sustainable production, surpassing conventional local practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信