{"title":"模拟德克萨斯高平原三种棉花种植系统的作物产量和水分生产力","authors":"Bishnu Ghimire , Oluwatola Adedeji , Glen L. Ritchie , Wenxuan Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.crope.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implementing appropriate cropping systems suited to specific soil types and climatic conditions is crucial for improving crop yield and conserving water in semi-arid environments. The Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) was applied to simulate crop yields of cotton, sorghum, and winter wheat across three cropping systems, including continuous cotton, cotton–sorghum, and cotton–wheat. Simulations were conducted for 48 fields with various soil types across six counties in the Texas High Plains, spanning growing seasons from 2000 to 2022. Cotton water productivity, derived from DSSAT-simulated cotton yield and crop evapotranspiration (ET), was compared among these cropping systems. The DSSAT demonstrated good performance (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.79, nRMSE ≤ 15.74%, and d-index ≥ 0.95) in predicting yields of cotton, sorghum, and winter wheat. The CROPGRO-Cotton model showed slightly better accuracy in predicting cotton yield under the continuous cotton system than under the cotton–sorghum and cotton–wheat systems. Model performance was similar across different soil types, with slightly higher accuracy in fine-textured soils such as clay loam (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.84, MAPE = 12.35, and d-index = 0.95) than in other soils (R<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.82, MAPE ≥ 13.76, and d-index ≤ 0.94). Additionally, the model performance varied by season, showing high accuracy in years with adequate precipitation but generally underpredicting cotton yields in drought seasons. Among the three cropping systems, cotton yield and water productivity were the highest for the cotton–sorghum system (6.3 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup>), followed by the cotton–wheat and continuous cotton systems. Overall, the DSSAT models effectively captured the effects of management practices, soil types, and growing seasons in predicting crop yield and crop water productivity across three cotton-based cropping systems. The findings provide valuable information for decision support in adopting cropping systems across various soil types and environmental conditions, fostering sustainable agriculture and water conservation in semi-arid regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100340,"journal":{"name":"Crop and Environment","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 83-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulating crop yields and water productivity for three cotton-based cropping systems in the Texas High Plains\",\"authors\":\"Bishnu Ghimire , Oluwatola Adedeji , Glen L. Ritchie , Wenxuan Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crope.2025.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Implementing appropriate cropping systems suited to specific soil types and climatic conditions is crucial for improving crop yield and conserving water in semi-arid environments. The Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) was applied to simulate crop yields of cotton, sorghum, and winter wheat across three cropping systems, including continuous cotton, cotton–sorghum, and cotton–wheat. Simulations were conducted for 48 fields with various soil types across six counties in the Texas High Plains, spanning growing seasons from 2000 to 2022. Cotton water productivity, derived from DSSAT-simulated cotton yield and crop evapotranspiration (ET), was compared among these cropping systems. The DSSAT demonstrated good performance (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.79, nRMSE ≤ 15.74%, and d-index ≥ 0.95) in predicting yields of cotton, sorghum, and winter wheat. The CROPGRO-Cotton model showed slightly better accuracy in predicting cotton yield under the continuous cotton system than under the cotton–sorghum and cotton–wheat systems. Model performance was similar across different soil types, with slightly higher accuracy in fine-textured soils such as clay loam (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.84, MAPE = 12.35, and d-index = 0.95) than in other soils (R<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.82, MAPE ≥ 13.76, and d-index ≤ 0.94). Additionally, the model performance varied by season, showing high accuracy in years with adequate precipitation but generally underpredicting cotton yields in drought seasons. Among the three cropping systems, cotton yield and water productivity were the highest for the cotton–sorghum system (6.3 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> mm<sup>−1</sup>), followed by the cotton–wheat and continuous cotton systems. Overall, the DSSAT models effectively captured the effects of management practices, soil types, and growing seasons in predicting crop yield and crop water productivity across three cotton-based cropping systems. The findings provide valuable information for decision support in adopting cropping systems across various soil types and environmental conditions, fostering sustainable agriculture and water conservation in semi-arid regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop and Environment\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 83-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X25000097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X25000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
实施适合特定土壤类型和气候条件的适当种植制度对于在半干旱环境中提高作物产量和保水至关重要。应用农业技术转移决策支持系统(DSSAT)对棉花、高粱和冬小麦3种连作制度(棉花-高粱和棉花-小麦)的作物产量进行了模拟。对德克萨斯高平原6个县的48块不同土壤类型的农田进行了模拟,涵盖了2000年至2022年的生长季节。根据dssat模拟的棉花产量和作物蒸散量(ET),比较了这些种植制度之间的棉花水分生产力。DSSAT在棉花、高粱和冬小麦产量预测中表现良好(R2≥0.79,nRMSE≤15.74%,d-index≥0.95)。CROPGRO-Cotton模型对棉花连作系统下棉花产量的预测精度略高于棉-高粱和棉-小麦系统。不同土壤类型的模型表现相似,粘土壤土等细质地土壤(R2≥0.84,MAPE = 12.35, d-index = 0.95)的模型精度略高于其他土壤(R2≤0.82,MAPE≥13.76,d-index≤0.94)。此外,模型的表现因季节而异,在降水充足的年份显示出较高的准确性,但在干旱季节通常会低估棉花产量。在3种种植制度中,棉花产量和水分生产力最高的是棉-高粱制度(6.3 kg ha−1 mm−1),其次是棉麦制度和棉花连作制度。总体而言,DSSAT模型有效地捕获了管理实践、土壤类型和生长季节在预测三种棉花种植系统的作物产量和作物水分生产力方面的影响。研究结果为在半干旱地区采用不同土壤类型和环境条件下的种植制度、促进可持续农业和节水提供了有价值的决策支持信息。
Simulating crop yields and water productivity for three cotton-based cropping systems in the Texas High Plains
Implementing appropriate cropping systems suited to specific soil types and climatic conditions is crucial for improving crop yield and conserving water in semi-arid environments. The Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) was applied to simulate crop yields of cotton, sorghum, and winter wheat across three cropping systems, including continuous cotton, cotton–sorghum, and cotton–wheat. Simulations were conducted for 48 fields with various soil types across six counties in the Texas High Plains, spanning growing seasons from 2000 to 2022. Cotton water productivity, derived from DSSAT-simulated cotton yield and crop evapotranspiration (ET), was compared among these cropping systems. The DSSAT demonstrated good performance (R2 ≥ 0.79, nRMSE ≤ 15.74%, and d-index ≥ 0.95) in predicting yields of cotton, sorghum, and winter wheat. The CROPGRO-Cotton model showed slightly better accuracy in predicting cotton yield under the continuous cotton system than under the cotton–sorghum and cotton–wheat systems. Model performance was similar across different soil types, with slightly higher accuracy in fine-textured soils such as clay loam (R2 ≥ 0.84, MAPE = 12.35, and d-index = 0.95) than in other soils (R2 ≤ 0.82, MAPE ≥ 13.76, and d-index ≤ 0.94). Additionally, the model performance varied by season, showing high accuracy in years with adequate precipitation but generally underpredicting cotton yields in drought seasons. Among the three cropping systems, cotton yield and water productivity were the highest for the cotton–sorghum system (6.3 kg ha−1 mm−1), followed by the cotton–wheat and continuous cotton systems. Overall, the DSSAT models effectively captured the effects of management practices, soil types, and growing seasons in predicting crop yield and crop water productivity across three cotton-based cropping systems. The findings provide valuable information for decision support in adopting cropping systems across various soil types and environmental conditions, fostering sustainable agriculture and water conservation in semi-arid regions.