{"title":"土地占用导致的生物多样性损失:中国地县生物多样性足迹评价","authors":"Xi Ji, Jie Lin, Qiuyin Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Habitat destruction from land use is a key driver of biodiversity loss, projected to worsen without further interventions. Scientific assessments of land occupation's impact on biodiversity are critical to addressing this challenge. Using the LC-IMPACT model, we calculated characterization factors (CF) tailored for biodiversity footprint (BF) accounting at finer spatial scales in China. These CFs quantify biodiversity damage per unit of land use, revealing greater biodiversity loss in southern China compared to northern regions for similar activities. We conducted the first nationwide assessment of BF from land occupation at the prefecture (367 cities) and county (2850 counties) levels in China from 2006 to 2021. Key findings include: (1) overall BF increased in most prefectures, with declines mainly in the northwest and southwest; (2) cropland BF rose in northern and southern regions but fell in central areas, forest BF increased in the northwest but decreased in the southeast, grassland BF generally declined, while urban BF showed widespread growth; and (3) eastern economic regions and western agricultural zones recorded the highest BF values. The CFs and BF results provide technical tools for corporate biodiversity impact assessments and land-use policy design. This study also offers a scalable model for global biodiversity footprint accounting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 108670"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity loss from land occupation: A prefecture- and county-level assessment of biodiversity footprints in China\",\"authors\":\"Xi Ji, Jie Lin, Qiuyin Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Habitat destruction from land use is a key driver of biodiversity loss, projected to worsen without further interventions. Scientific assessments of land occupation's impact on biodiversity are critical to addressing this challenge. Using the LC-IMPACT model, we calculated characterization factors (CF) tailored for biodiversity footprint (BF) accounting at finer spatial scales in China. These CFs quantify biodiversity damage per unit of land use, revealing greater biodiversity loss in southern China compared to northern regions for similar activities. We conducted the first nationwide assessment of BF from land occupation at the prefecture (367 cities) and county (2850 counties) levels in China from 2006 to 2021. Key findings include: (1) overall BF increased in most prefectures, with declines mainly in the northwest and southwest; (2) cropland BF rose in northern and southern regions but fell in central areas, forest BF increased in the northwest but decreased in the southeast, grassland BF generally declined, while urban BF showed widespread growth; and (3) eastern economic regions and western agricultural zones recorded the highest BF values. The CFs and BF results provide technical tools for corporate biodiversity impact assessments and land-use policy design. This study also offers a scalable model for global biodiversity footprint accounting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001533\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biodiversity loss from land occupation: A prefecture- and county-level assessment of biodiversity footprints in China
Habitat destruction from land use is a key driver of biodiversity loss, projected to worsen without further interventions. Scientific assessments of land occupation's impact on biodiversity are critical to addressing this challenge. Using the LC-IMPACT model, we calculated characterization factors (CF) tailored for biodiversity footprint (BF) accounting at finer spatial scales in China. These CFs quantify biodiversity damage per unit of land use, revealing greater biodiversity loss in southern China compared to northern regions for similar activities. We conducted the first nationwide assessment of BF from land occupation at the prefecture (367 cities) and county (2850 counties) levels in China from 2006 to 2021. Key findings include: (1) overall BF increased in most prefectures, with declines mainly in the northwest and southwest; (2) cropland BF rose in northern and southern regions but fell in central areas, forest BF increased in the northwest but decreased in the southeast, grassland BF generally declined, while urban BF showed widespread growth; and (3) eastern economic regions and western agricultural zones recorded the highest BF values. The CFs and BF results provide technical tools for corporate biodiversity impact assessments and land-use policy design. This study also offers a scalable model for global biodiversity footprint accounting.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.