土地占用导致的生物多样性损失:中国地县生物多样性足迹评价

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Xi Ji, Jie Lin, Qiuyin Ji
{"title":"土地占用导致的生物多样性损失:中国地县生物多样性足迹评价","authors":"Xi Ji,&nbsp;Jie Lin,&nbsp;Qiuyin Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Habitat destruction from land use is a key driver of biodiversity loss, projected to worsen without further interventions. Scientific assessments of land occupation's impact on biodiversity are critical to addressing this challenge. Using the LC-IMPACT model, we calculated characterization factors (CF) tailored for biodiversity footprint (BF) accounting at finer spatial scales in China. These CFs quantify biodiversity damage per unit of land use, revealing greater biodiversity loss in southern China compared to northern regions for similar activities. We conducted the first nationwide assessment of BF from land occupation at the prefecture (367 cities) and county (2850 counties) levels in China from 2006 to 2021. Key findings include: (1) overall BF increased in most prefectures, with declines mainly in the northwest and southwest; (2) cropland BF rose in northern and southern regions but fell in central areas, forest BF increased in the northwest but decreased in the southeast, grassland BF generally declined, while urban BF showed widespread growth; and (3) eastern economic regions and western agricultural zones recorded the highest BF values. The CFs and BF results provide technical tools for corporate biodiversity impact assessments and land-use policy design. This study also offers a scalable model for global biodiversity footprint accounting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 108670"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity loss from land occupation: A prefecture- and county-level assessment of biodiversity footprints in China\",\"authors\":\"Xi Ji,&nbsp;Jie Lin,&nbsp;Qiuyin Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Habitat destruction from land use is a key driver of biodiversity loss, projected to worsen without further interventions. Scientific assessments of land occupation's impact on biodiversity are critical to addressing this challenge. Using the LC-IMPACT model, we calculated characterization factors (CF) tailored for biodiversity footprint (BF) accounting at finer spatial scales in China. These CFs quantify biodiversity damage per unit of land use, revealing greater biodiversity loss in southern China compared to northern regions for similar activities. We conducted the first nationwide assessment of BF from land occupation at the prefecture (367 cities) and county (2850 counties) levels in China from 2006 to 2021. Key findings include: (1) overall BF increased in most prefectures, with declines mainly in the northwest and southwest; (2) cropland BF rose in northern and southern regions but fell in central areas, forest BF increased in the northwest but decreased in the southeast, grassland BF generally declined, while urban BF showed widespread growth; and (3) eastern economic regions and western agricultural zones recorded the highest BF values. The CFs and BF results provide technical tools for corporate biodiversity impact assessments and land-use policy design. This study also offers a scalable model for global biodiversity footprint accounting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001533\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地利用造成的栖息地破坏是生物多样性丧失的一个主要驱动因素,如果不采取进一步干预措施,预计情况将进一步恶化。科学评估土地占用对生物多样性的影响对于应对这一挑战至关重要。利用LC-IMPACT模型,在更精细的空间尺度上,计算了适合中国生物多样性足迹核算的特征因子(CF)。这些CFs量化了每单位土地利用的生物多样性损害,揭示了在类似活动中,中国南方地区的生物多样性损失比北方地区更大。2006年至2021年,我们首次在全国范围内对地级(367个市)和县级(2850个县)的土地占用情况进行了BF评估。主要发现包括:(1)大多数地区的总体BF增加,主要在西北和西南地区下降;(2)农田风险量呈南北上升、中部下降趋势,森林风险量呈西北上升、东南下降趋势,草地风险量总体下降,城市风险量普遍增长;(3)东部经济区和西部农业区BF值最高。CFs和BF的结果为企业生物多样性影响评价和土地利用政策设计提供了技术工具。该研究还为全球生物多样性足迹核算提供了一个可扩展的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biodiversity loss from land occupation: A prefecture- and county-level assessment of biodiversity footprints in China
Habitat destruction from land use is a key driver of biodiversity loss, projected to worsen without further interventions. Scientific assessments of land occupation's impact on biodiversity are critical to addressing this challenge. Using the LC-IMPACT model, we calculated characterization factors (CF) tailored for biodiversity footprint (BF) accounting at finer spatial scales in China. These CFs quantify biodiversity damage per unit of land use, revealing greater biodiversity loss in southern China compared to northern regions for similar activities. We conducted the first nationwide assessment of BF from land occupation at the prefecture (367 cities) and county (2850 counties) levels in China from 2006 to 2021. Key findings include: (1) overall BF increased in most prefectures, with declines mainly in the northwest and southwest; (2) cropland BF rose in northern and southern regions but fell in central areas, forest BF increased in the northwest but decreased in the southeast, grassland BF generally declined, while urban BF showed widespread growth; and (3) eastern economic regions and western agricultural zones recorded the highest BF values. The CFs and BF results provide technical tools for corporate biodiversity impact assessments and land-use policy design. This study also offers a scalable model for global biodiversity footprint accounting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信