在一项Fast-Fail试验中,个体功能性脑映射机器学习预测由选择性阿片样物质拮抗剂引起的症状改变

Matthew D. Sacchet , Joseph L. Valenti , Poorvi Keshava , Shane W. Walsh , Moria J. Smoski , Andrew D. Krystal , Diego A. Pizzagalli
{"title":"在一项Fast-Fail试验中,个体功能性脑映射机器学习预测由选择性阿片样物质拮抗剂引起的症状改变","authors":"Matthew D. Sacchet ,&nbsp;Joseph L. Valenti ,&nbsp;Poorvi Keshava ,&nbsp;Shane W. Walsh ,&nbsp;Moria J. Smoski ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Krystal ,&nbsp;Diego A. Pizzagalli","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anhedonia remains a difficult-to-treat symptom and has been associated with poor clinical course transdiagnostically. Here, we applied machine learning models to individualized neural patches derived from fMRI data during the Monetary Incentive Delay Task in anhedonic participants (N = 67) recruited for a clinical trial examining K-opioid receptor (KOR) antagonism in the treatment of anhedonia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine ensemble models were estimated using cortical, subcortical, and combined cortical subcortical features from individualized functional topographies to predict changes in symptoms of overall psychopathology (anhedonia, depression, anxiety). Analyses were performed on the KOR (N = 33) and placebo (N = 34) group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Initial models showed that only subcortical data predicting depression and anxiety symptom change had a significant Spearman correlation between veridical and predicted data (<em>rho</em> = 0.480 and <em>rho</em> = 0.415 respectively). Next, leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV) showed that the best-performing models comprised only the subcortical individualized systems data, which correlated with clinical change for depression and anxiety scores for the KOR group with significantly higher accuracy (<em>rho</em> = 0.634 and <em>rho</em> = 0.562, respectively) compared to the placebo group (<em>rho</em> = 0.294 and <em>rho</em> = 0.034, respectively). Further, 25 subcortical neural features were identified based on correlation and ensemble determined importance in driving prediction. Final models for both depression and anxiety showed an overall higher representation of the dorsal attention network. Cortical and combined cortical-subcortical feature data showed no significant improvement in prediction of clinical change between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using an ensemble of machine learning approaches, we identified individual differences in subcortical individualized systems data that predicted clinical change that was specific to KOR antagonism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualized functional brain mapping machine learning prediction of symptom-change resulting from selective kappa-opioid antagonism in an anhedonic sample from a Fast-Fail trial\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D. Sacchet ,&nbsp;Joseph L. Valenti ,&nbsp;Poorvi Keshava ,&nbsp;Shane W. Walsh ,&nbsp;Moria J. Smoski ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Krystal ,&nbsp;Diego A. Pizzagalli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anhedonia remains a difficult-to-treat symptom and has been associated with poor clinical course transdiagnostically. Here, we applied machine learning models to individualized neural patches derived from fMRI data during the Monetary Incentive Delay Task in anhedonic participants (N = 67) recruited for a clinical trial examining K-opioid receptor (KOR) antagonism in the treatment of anhedonia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine ensemble models were estimated using cortical, subcortical, and combined cortical subcortical features from individualized functional topographies to predict changes in symptoms of overall psychopathology (anhedonia, depression, anxiety). Analyses were performed on the KOR (N = 33) and placebo (N = 34) group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Initial models showed that only subcortical data predicting depression and anxiety symptom change had a significant Spearman correlation between veridical and predicted data (<em>rho</em> = 0.480 and <em>rho</em> = 0.415 respectively). Next, leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV) showed that the best-performing models comprised only the subcortical individualized systems data, which correlated with clinical change for depression and anxiety scores for the KOR group with significantly higher accuracy (<em>rho</em> = 0.634 and <em>rho</em> = 0.562, respectively) compared to the placebo group (<em>rho</em> = 0.294 and <em>rho</em> = 0.034, respectively). Further, 25 subcortical neural features were identified based on correlation and ensemble determined importance in driving prediction. Final models for both depression and anxiety showed an overall higher representation of the dorsal attention network. Cortical and combined cortical-subcortical feature data showed no significant improvement in prediction of clinical change between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using an ensemble of machine learning approaches, we identified individual differences in subcortical individualized systems data that predicted clinical change that was specific to KOR antagonism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:快感缺乏仍然是一种难以治疗的症状,并且与不良的临床病程相关。在这里,我们将机器学习模型应用于从货币激励延迟任务中获得的功能磁共振成像数据中获得的个性化神经贴片,这些数据来自于一项临床试验,该试验招募了缺乏症参与者(N = 67),以检查k -阿片受体(KOR)拮抗剂治疗缺乏症。方法使用皮质、皮质下和个性化功能地形的皮质下联合特征来估计神经网络集合模型,以预测整体精神病理症状(快感缺乏、抑郁、焦虑)的变化。对KOR组(N = 33)和安慰剂组(N = 34)进行分析。结果初步模型显示,只有皮质下数据预测抑郁和焦虑症状的变化与预测数据具有显著的Spearman相关性(rho = 0.480,rho = 0.415)。接下来,留一出来交叉验证(LOOCV)显示,与安慰剂组(rho = 0.294和rho = 0.034)相比,表现最好的模型仅包含皮质下个体化系统数据,其与KOR组抑郁和焦虑评分的临床变化相关(rho = 0.634和rho = 0.562)的准确性显着更高。此外,基于相关性和集合决定在驱动预测中的重要性,确定了25个皮层下神经特征。抑郁和焦虑的最终模型显示,背部注意网络的总体代表性更高。皮质和皮质-皮质下联合特征数据显示两组在预测临床变化方面无显著改善。使用机器学习方法的集合,我们确定了皮质下个体化系统数据的个体差异,这些数据预测了KOR拮抗剂特异性的临床变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individualized functional brain mapping machine learning prediction of symptom-change resulting from selective kappa-opioid antagonism in an anhedonic sample from a Fast-Fail trial

Background

Anhedonia remains a difficult-to-treat symptom and has been associated with poor clinical course transdiagnostically. Here, we applied machine learning models to individualized neural patches derived from fMRI data during the Monetary Incentive Delay Task in anhedonic participants (N = 67) recruited for a clinical trial examining K-opioid receptor (KOR) antagonism in the treatment of anhedonia.

Methods

Nine ensemble models were estimated using cortical, subcortical, and combined cortical subcortical features from individualized functional topographies to predict changes in symptoms of overall psychopathology (anhedonia, depression, anxiety). Analyses were performed on the KOR (N = 33) and placebo (N = 34) group.

Results

Initial models showed that only subcortical data predicting depression and anxiety symptom change had a significant Spearman correlation between veridical and predicted data (rho = 0.480 and rho = 0.415 respectively). Next, leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV) showed that the best-performing models comprised only the subcortical individualized systems data, which correlated with clinical change for depression and anxiety scores for the KOR group with significantly higher accuracy (rho = 0.634 and rho = 0.562, respectively) compared to the placebo group (rho = 0.294 and rho = 0.034, respectively). Further, 25 subcortical neural features were identified based on correlation and ensemble determined importance in driving prediction. Final models for both depression and anxiety showed an overall higher representation of the dorsal attention network. Cortical and combined cortical-subcortical feature data showed no significant improvement in prediction of clinical change between the two groups.

Conclusion

Using an ensemble of machine learning approaches, we identified individual differences in subcortical individualized systems data that predicted clinical change that was specific to KOR antagonism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信