{"title":"卫星反演云特性的采样偏差及其对气溶胶-云相互作用的影响","authors":"Goutam Choudhury, Tom Goren","doi":"10.1029/2025GL115429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Satellite radiometers like MODIS use a bi-spectral retrieval algorithm to simultaneously retrieve cloud optical thickness and cloud effective radius <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </msub>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\left({r}_{\\mathrm{e}}\\right)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. However, retrievals fail for liquid clouds when the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${r}_{\\mathrm{e}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> observation exceeds the maximum threshold of 30 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\upmu }$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>m in MODIS's solution space, leading to a sampling bias. Here, we quantify this bias by reconstructing pixels with failed retrievals using two methods: a conservative approach assigning a fixed minimum <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${r}_{\\mathrm{e}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> threshold to failed pixels, and a representative approach modeling failed <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${r}_{\\mathrm{e}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> using CloudSat radar measurements. We show that MODIS overestimates cloud droplet number concentration by 8%–9% and underestimates liquid water path by 8%–11% globally. We demonstrate that this bias can introduce erroneous correlations between cloud properties that may be misinterpreted as causal processes. Accordingly, we show that accounting for this bias increases the cloud water adjustments by 24%–36%, highlighting the crucial need to expand the solution space in MODIS and similar sensors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GL115429","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sampling Bias From Satellite Retrieval Failures of Cloud Properties and Its Implications for Aerosol-Cloud Interactions\",\"authors\":\"Goutam Choudhury, Tom Goren\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025GL115429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Satellite radiometers like MODIS use a bi-spectral retrieval algorithm to simultaneously retrieve cloud optical thickness and cloud effective radius <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mfenced>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mfenced>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\left({r}_{\\\\mathrm{e}}\\\\right)$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. However, retrievals fail for liquid clouds when the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${r}_{\\\\mathrm{e}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> observation exceeds the maximum threshold of 30 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>μ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\upmu }$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>m in MODIS's solution space, leading to a sampling bias. Here, we quantify this bias by reconstructing pixels with failed retrievals using two methods: a conservative approach assigning a fixed minimum <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${r}_{\\\\mathrm{e}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> threshold to failed pixels, and a representative approach modeling failed <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${r}_{\\\\mathrm{e}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> using CloudSat radar measurements. We show that MODIS overestimates cloud droplet number concentration by 8%–9% and underestimates liquid water path by 8%–11% globally. We demonstrate that this bias can introduce erroneous correlations between cloud properties that may be misinterpreted as causal processes. Accordingly, we show that accounting for this bias increases the cloud water adjustments by 24%–36%, highlighting the crucial need to expand the solution space in MODIS and similar sensors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"52 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GL115429\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL115429\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL115429","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sampling Bias From Satellite Retrieval Failures of Cloud Properties and Its Implications for Aerosol-Cloud Interactions
Satellite radiometers like MODIS use a bi-spectral retrieval algorithm to simultaneously retrieve cloud optical thickness and cloud effective radius . However, retrievals fail for liquid clouds when the observation exceeds the maximum threshold of 30 m in MODIS's solution space, leading to a sampling bias. Here, we quantify this bias by reconstructing pixels with failed retrievals using two methods: a conservative approach assigning a fixed minimum threshold to failed pixels, and a representative approach modeling failed using CloudSat radar measurements. We show that MODIS overestimates cloud droplet number concentration by 8%–9% and underestimates liquid water path by 8%–11% globally. We demonstrate that this bias can introduce erroneous correlations between cloud properties that may be misinterpreted as causal processes. Accordingly, we show that accounting for this bias increases the cloud water adjustments by 24%–36%, highlighting the crucial need to expand the solution space in MODIS and similar sensors.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.