以创伤为焦点的认知行为疗法对创伤后应激障碍的疗效:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Simonne L Wright,Eirini Karyotaki,Marit Sijbrandij,Pim Cuijpers,Jonathan I Bisson,Davide Papola,Anke B Witteveen,Sudie E Back,Dana Bichescu-Burian,Liuva Capezzani,Marylene Cloitre,Grant J Devilly,Thomas Elbert,Marcelo Feijo Mello,Julian D Ford,Damion Grasso,Richard Gray,Moira Haller,Nigel Hunt,Rolf J Kleber,Julia König,Claire Kullack,Jonathan Laugharne,Rachel Liebman,Christopher William Lee,Jeannette Lely,John C Markowitz,Candice Monson,Mirjam J Nijdam,Sonya Norman,Miranda Olff,Tahereh Mina Orang,Luca Ostacoli,Nenad Paunovic,Eva Petkova,Rita Rosner,Maggie Schauer,Joy M Schmitz,Ulrich Schnyder,Brian Smith,Anka A Vujanovic,Yinyin Zang,Soraya Seedat
{"title":"以创伤为焦点的认知行为疗法对创伤后应激障碍的疗效:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。","authors":"Simonne L Wright,Eirini Karyotaki,Marit Sijbrandij,Pim Cuijpers,Jonathan I Bisson,Davide Papola,Anke B Witteveen,Sudie E Back,Dana Bichescu-Burian,Liuva Capezzani,Marylene Cloitre,Grant J Devilly,Thomas Elbert,Marcelo Feijo Mello,Julian D Ford,Damion Grasso,Richard Gray,Moira Haller,Nigel Hunt,Rolf J Kleber,Julia König,Claire Kullack,Jonathan Laugharne,Rachel Liebman,Christopher William Lee,Jeannette Lely,John C Markowitz,Candice Monson,Mirjam J Nijdam,Sonya Norman,Miranda Olff,Tahereh Mina Orang,Luca Ostacoli,Nenad Paunovic,Eva Petkova,Rita Rosner,Maggie Schauer,Joy M Schmitz,Ulrich Schnyder,Brian Smith,Anka A Vujanovic,Yinyin Zang,Soraya Seedat","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis individual participant data meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, we examined the effect of moderators on PTSD symptom severity.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nThis study included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-TF to an inactive or active comparison group for adults with PTSD. The primary and secondary outcomes were PTSD symptom severity and remission, respectively. Moderators included sociodemographic and clinical variables.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwelve studies compared CBT-TF with inactive (n = 625) and 11 with active comparison conditions (n = 706). The one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found that CBT-TF was more effective than inactive comparison conditions (β = -0.78; OR = 2.34) and not significantly different from active comparison conditions (β = 0.02; OR = 0.53) in reducing PTSD symptom severity and achieving PTSD remission, respectively. When comparing CBT-TF with inactive treatments, moderator analysis found that divorced participants had greater PTSD symptoms postintervention following CBT-TF than participants who were single, cohabitating, or married receiving CBT-TF, both in the completer (β = 0.93) and full-sample (β = 0.59) analyses. For the active treatment comparison, moderator analysis found that participants taking psychotropic medication had lower PTSD symptoms following CBT-TF than those not taking psychotropic medication in the completer analysis (β = -0.39).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBased on our moderator analyses, further research is needed to understand the effect of psychotropic medication on the CBT-TF intervention process. Moreover, divorced participants with PTSD receiving CBT-TF might benefit from enhanced support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":"401-426"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapies with a trauma focus for posttraumatic stress disorder: An individual participant data meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Simonne L Wright,Eirini Karyotaki,Marit Sijbrandij,Pim Cuijpers,Jonathan I Bisson,Davide Papola,Anke B Witteveen,Sudie E Back,Dana Bichescu-Burian,Liuva Capezzani,Marylene Cloitre,Grant J Devilly,Thomas Elbert,Marcelo Feijo Mello,Julian D Ford,Damion Grasso,Richard Gray,Moira Haller,Nigel Hunt,Rolf J Kleber,Julia König,Claire Kullack,Jonathan Laugharne,Rachel Liebman,Christopher William Lee,Jeannette Lely,John C Markowitz,Candice Monson,Mirjam J Nijdam,Sonya Norman,Miranda Olff,Tahereh Mina Orang,Luca Ostacoli,Nenad Paunovic,Eva Petkova,Rita Rosner,Maggie Schauer,Joy M Schmitz,Ulrich Schnyder,Brian Smith,Anka A Vujanovic,Yinyin Zang,Soraya Seedat\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ccp0000942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis individual participant data meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, we examined the effect of moderators on PTSD symptom severity.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nThis study included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-TF to an inactive or active comparison group for adults with PTSD. The primary and secondary outcomes were PTSD symptom severity and remission, respectively. Moderators included sociodemographic and clinical variables.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTwelve studies compared CBT-TF with inactive (n = 625) and 11 with active comparison conditions (n = 706). The one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found that CBT-TF was more effective than inactive comparison conditions (β = -0.78; OR = 2.34) and not significantly different from active comparison conditions (β = 0.02; OR = 0.53) in reducing PTSD symptom severity and achieving PTSD remission, respectively. When comparing CBT-TF with inactive treatments, moderator analysis found that divorced participants had greater PTSD symptoms postintervention following CBT-TF than participants who were single, cohabitating, or married receiving CBT-TF, both in the completer (β = 0.93) and full-sample (β = 0.59) analyses. For the active treatment comparison, moderator analysis found that participants taking psychotropic medication had lower PTSD symptoms following CBT-TF than those not taking psychotropic medication in the completer analysis (β = -0.39).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nBased on our moderator analyses, further research is needed to understand the effect of psychotropic medication on the CBT-TF intervention process. Moreover, divorced participants with PTSD receiving CBT-TF might benefit from enhanced support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":15447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"401-426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000942\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨创伤焦点认知行为疗法(CBT-TF)治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的有效性。此外,我们检验了调节因子对PTSD症状严重程度的影响。方法本研究纳入随机对照试验,将CBT-TF与不活动组或活动组进行比较。主要和次要结局分别是PTSD症状严重程度和缓解。调节因素包括社会人口学和临床变量。结果12项研究将CBT-TF与无活性对照(n = 625)进行比较,11项研究与有活性对照(n = 706)进行比较。单阶段个体参与者数据荟萃分析发现CBT-TF比无活动对照条件更有效(β = -0.78;OR = 2.34),与主动比较条件无显著差异(β = 0.02;OR = 0.53)分别在减轻PTSD症状严重程度和实现PTSD缓解方面。当将CBT-TF与非活动治疗进行比较时,调节分析发现,在完成分析(β = 0.93)和全样本分析(β = 0.59)中,离婚参与者在CBT-TF干预后的PTSD症状高于接受CBT-TF的单身、同居或已婚参与者。对于积极治疗比较,调节因子分析发现,在完全分析中,服用精神药物的参与者在CBT-TF后PTSD症状低于未服用精神药物的参与者(β = -0.39)。结论基于我们的调节分析,精神药物对CBT-TF干预过程的影响有待进一步研究。此外,接受CBT-TF治疗的离异PTSD患者可能会从增强的支持中受益。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapies with a trauma focus for posttraumatic stress disorder: An individual participant data meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE This individual participant data meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, we examined the effect of moderators on PTSD symptom severity. METHOD This study included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-TF to an inactive or active comparison group for adults with PTSD. The primary and secondary outcomes were PTSD symptom severity and remission, respectively. Moderators included sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS Twelve studies compared CBT-TF with inactive (n = 625) and 11 with active comparison conditions (n = 706). The one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found that CBT-TF was more effective than inactive comparison conditions (β = -0.78; OR = 2.34) and not significantly different from active comparison conditions (β = 0.02; OR = 0.53) in reducing PTSD symptom severity and achieving PTSD remission, respectively. When comparing CBT-TF with inactive treatments, moderator analysis found that divorced participants had greater PTSD symptoms postintervention following CBT-TF than participants who were single, cohabitating, or married receiving CBT-TF, both in the completer (β = 0.93) and full-sample (β = 0.59) analyses. For the active treatment comparison, moderator analysis found that participants taking psychotropic medication had lower PTSD symptoms following CBT-TF than those not taking psychotropic medication in the completer analysis (β = -0.39). CONCLUSION Based on our moderator analyses, further research is needed to understand the effect of psychotropic medication on the CBT-TF intervention process. Moreover, divorced participants with PTSD receiving CBT-TF might benefit from enhanced support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信