泪液中抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体诊断眼部重症肌无力。

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Cheng Lu,Yuanting Yang,Yuying Dong,Ting Tang,Jian Chen,Yingwei Wang,Zheng Wu,Qing Zhou
{"title":"泪液中抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体诊断眼部重症肌无力。","authors":"Cheng Lu,Yuanting Yang,Yuying Dong,Ting Tang,Jian Chen,Yingwei Wang,Zheng Wu,Qing Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\r\nOcular myasthenia gravis (OMG) significantly affects patients' quality of life. However, conventional serum assays often fail to detect anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies in more than half of OMG cases, complicating accurate diagnosis. Given the immunological role of tears in the ocular environment, they may serve as a viable alternative for antibody detection. This study investigates the utility of tear-based anti-AChR antibody detection as a diagnostic tool for OMG and compares its performance with that of serum-based cell-based assays (CBAs).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nProspective diagnostic testing validity evaluation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 65 participants were enrolled, including 52 patients diagnosed with OMG and 13 healthy controls. Anti-AChR antibodies were assessed in both serum and tear samples using CBAs. Diagnostic performance metrics were compared between the two sample types, and correlations between antibody levels and clinical severity were analyzed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTear-based CBA demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.926, P < 0.0001) compared to serum-based CBA (AUC = 0.656, P = 0.0836). The sensitivity of tear CBA was 80.8% (95% CI: 68.1%-89.2%), markedly higher than that of serum CBA at 42.3% (95% CI: 29.9%-55.8%). Among the 42 seronegative OMG patients, 83.3% tested positive using tear CBA, whereas only 40.5% were positive via serum CBA (P < 0.0001). Notably, tear anti-AChR antibody levels did not show a consistent correlation with symptom severity.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nTear-based detection of anti-AChR antibodies offers a non-invasive, highly sensitive diagnostic approach for OMG, particularly beneficial in cases where serum tests are negative. This method holds promise for improving early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in OMG management.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Acetylcholine Receptor antibodies in Tear for the Diagnosis of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Lu,Yuanting Yang,Yuying Dong,Ting Tang,Jian Chen,Yingwei Wang,Zheng Wu,Qing Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\\r\\nOcular myasthenia gravis (OMG) significantly affects patients' quality of life. However, conventional serum assays often fail to detect anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies in more than half of OMG cases, complicating accurate diagnosis. Given the immunological role of tears in the ocular environment, they may serve as a viable alternative for antibody detection. This study investigates the utility of tear-based anti-AChR antibody detection as a diagnostic tool for OMG and compares its performance with that of serum-based cell-based assays (CBAs).\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nProspective diagnostic testing validity evaluation.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA total of 65 participants were enrolled, including 52 patients diagnosed with OMG and 13 healthy controls. Anti-AChR antibodies were assessed in both serum and tear samples using CBAs. Diagnostic performance metrics were compared between the two sample types, and correlations between antibody levels and clinical severity were analyzed.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTear-based CBA demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.926, P < 0.0001) compared to serum-based CBA (AUC = 0.656, P = 0.0836). The sensitivity of tear CBA was 80.8% (95% CI: 68.1%-89.2%), markedly higher than that of serum CBA at 42.3% (95% CI: 29.9%-55.8%). Among the 42 seronegative OMG patients, 83.3% tested positive using tear CBA, whereas only 40.5% were positive via serum CBA (P < 0.0001). Notably, tear anti-AChR antibody levels did not show a consistent correlation with symptom severity.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nTear-based detection of anti-AChR antibodies offers a non-invasive, highly sensitive diagnostic approach for OMG, particularly beneficial in cases where serum tests are negative. This method holds promise for improving early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in OMG management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的眼重症肌无力(OMG)严重影响患者的生活质量。然而,在半数以上的OMG病例中,常规的血清检测往往不能检测到抗乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)抗体,这使准确诊断复杂化。鉴于泪液在眼环境中的免疫作用,它们可能作为抗体检测的可行替代方法。本研究探讨了基于泪液的抗achr抗体检测作为OMG诊断工具的效用,并将其性能与基于血清的细胞检测(cba)进行了比较。设计前瞻性诊断测试有效性评价。方法共纳入65名受试者,包括52名诊断为OMG的患者和13名健康对照。血清和泪液样本用cba检测抗achr抗体。比较两种样本类型的诊断性能指标,并分析抗体水平与临床严重程度之间的相关性。结果基于血清的CBA诊断准确率(AUC = 0.656,P = 0.0836)显著高于基于血清的CBA (AUC = 0.926,P < 0.0001)。泪液CBA的敏感性为80.8% (95% CI: 68.1% ~ 89.2%),明显高于血清CBA的42.3% (95% CI: 29.9% ~ 55.8%)。在42例血清阴性的OMG患者中,83.3%的患者泪液CBA检测为阳性,而血清CBA检测为阳性的患者仅为40.5% (P < 0.0001)。值得注意的是,泪液抗achr抗体水平与症状严重程度没有一致的相关性。结论:基于血清的抗achr抗体检测为OMG提供了一种非侵入性、高灵敏度的诊断方法,尤其对血清检测结果为阴性的病例有益。该方法有望改善OMG管理的早期诊断和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-Acetylcholine Receptor antibodies in Tear for the Diagnosis of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) significantly affects patients' quality of life. However, conventional serum assays often fail to detect anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies in more than half of OMG cases, complicating accurate diagnosis. Given the immunological role of tears in the ocular environment, they may serve as a viable alternative for antibody detection. This study investigates the utility of tear-based anti-AChR antibody detection as a diagnostic tool for OMG and compares its performance with that of serum-based cell-based assays (CBAs). DESIGN Prospective diagnostic testing validity evaluation. METHODS A total of 65 participants were enrolled, including 52 patients diagnosed with OMG and 13 healthy controls. Anti-AChR antibodies were assessed in both serum and tear samples using CBAs. Diagnostic performance metrics were compared between the two sample types, and correlations between antibody levels and clinical severity were analyzed. RESULTS Tear-based CBA demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.926, P < 0.0001) compared to serum-based CBA (AUC = 0.656, P = 0.0836). The sensitivity of tear CBA was 80.8% (95% CI: 68.1%-89.2%), markedly higher than that of serum CBA at 42.3% (95% CI: 29.9%-55.8%). Among the 42 seronegative OMG patients, 83.3% tested positive using tear CBA, whereas only 40.5% were positive via serum CBA (P < 0.0001). Notably, tear anti-AChR antibody levels did not show a consistent correlation with symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS Tear-based detection of anti-AChR antibodies offers a non-invasive, highly sensitive diagnostic approach for OMG, particularly beneficial in cases where serum tests are negative. This method holds promise for improving early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in OMG management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信