Peter Næsborg Schøler, Jens Søndergaard, Sanne Rasmussen, Kristina Hasselbalch Volke, Per Nilsen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen
{"title":"采用实施科学的统一框架在丹麦全科实践中实施15条方法的决定因素。","authors":"Peter Næsborg Schøler, Jens Søndergaard, Sanne Rasmussen, Kristina Hasselbalch Volke, Per Nilsen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00571-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive alcohol consumption is a significant global health issue, often unaddressed in primary care. The 15-method, a three-step opportunistic screening and treatment tool premised on Motivational Interviewing and integrated within the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment framework, offers a structured approach for healthcare professionals to identify and treat alcohol-related problems. The present study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of determinants for early-stage implementation of the 15-method in Danish general practice and to classify these determinants using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study involved individual interviews and group interviews with general practitioners and nurses (N = 28) from 12 general practices participating in the Identification and Treatment of Alcohol Problems in Primary Care (iTAPP) study, a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the 15-method in Danish general practice. Interviews were semi-structured, guided by the CFIR framework, and analyzed using directed content analysis. Determinants were rated for their influence on implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key facilitators included the 15-method's adaptability, strong evidence base, relative advantage, and compatibility with existing practices. Barriers included structural characteristics in the practices and local conditions. A central finding revealed a tension between patients' motivation and healthcare professionals' opportunities and capabilities to deliver the 15-method. Mixed determinants highlighted the complexity of implementing the 15-method across diverse practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the 15-method in Danish general practice is feasible but requires addressing specific barriers and leveraging facilitators. A multifaceted implementation strategy tailored to individual practices may be necessary to address the variations in contexts and resources across different practices with an emphasis on increasing healthcare professionals' capabilities and opportunities to deliver the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of implementing the 15-method in Danish general practice using the consolidated framework for implementation science.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Næsborg Schøler, Jens Søndergaard, Sanne Rasmussen, Kristina Hasselbalch Volke, Per Nilsen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-025-00571-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive alcohol consumption is a significant global health issue, often unaddressed in primary care. The 15-method, a three-step opportunistic screening and treatment tool premised on Motivational Interviewing and integrated within the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment framework, offers a structured approach for healthcare professionals to identify and treat alcohol-related problems. The present study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of determinants for early-stage implementation of the 15-method in Danish general practice and to classify these determinants using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study involved individual interviews and group interviews with general practitioners and nurses (N = 28) from 12 general practices participating in the Identification and Treatment of Alcohol Problems in Primary Care (iTAPP) study, a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the 15-method in Danish general practice. Interviews were semi-structured, guided by the CFIR framework, and analyzed using directed content analysis. Determinants were rated for their influence on implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key facilitators included the 15-method's adaptability, strong evidence base, relative advantage, and compatibility with existing practices. Barriers included structural characteristics in the practices and local conditions. A central finding revealed a tension between patients' motivation and healthcare professionals' opportunities and capabilities to deliver the 15-method. Mixed determinants highlighted the complexity of implementing the 15-method across diverse practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the 15-method in Danish general practice is feasible but requires addressing specific barriers and leveraging facilitators. A multifaceted implementation strategy tailored to individual practices may be necessary to address the variations in contexts and resources across different practices with an emphasis on increasing healthcare professionals' capabilities and opportunities to deliver the intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00571-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00571-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determinants of implementing the 15-method in Danish general practice using the consolidated framework for implementation science.
Background: Excessive alcohol consumption is a significant global health issue, often unaddressed in primary care. The 15-method, a three-step opportunistic screening and treatment tool premised on Motivational Interviewing and integrated within the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment framework, offers a structured approach for healthcare professionals to identify and treat alcohol-related problems. The present study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of determinants for early-stage implementation of the 15-method in Danish general practice and to classify these determinants using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Methods: This qualitative study involved individual interviews and group interviews with general practitioners and nurses (N = 28) from 12 general practices participating in the Identification and Treatment of Alcohol Problems in Primary Care (iTAPP) study, a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the 15-method in Danish general practice. Interviews were semi-structured, guided by the CFIR framework, and analyzed using directed content analysis. Determinants were rated for their influence on implementation.
Results: Key facilitators included the 15-method's adaptability, strong evidence base, relative advantage, and compatibility with existing practices. Barriers included structural characteristics in the practices and local conditions. A central finding revealed a tension between patients' motivation and healthcare professionals' opportunities and capabilities to deliver the 15-method. Mixed determinants highlighted the complexity of implementing the 15-method across diverse practices.
Conclusion: Implementing the 15-method in Danish general practice is feasible but requires addressing specific barriers and leveraging facilitators. A multifaceted implementation strategy tailored to individual practices may be necessary to address the variations in contexts and resources across different practices with an emphasis on increasing healthcare professionals' capabilities and opportunities to deliver the intervention.
期刊介绍：
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations.
Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
