Hiro Ito, Helen Banh, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Lily Wong, Sahar Allen, Lillian Hung
{"title":"这是一个由学生领导的跨代团队为社区中的老年人带来社交机器人和研究的批判性反映。","authors":"Hiro Ito, Helen Banh, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Lily Wong, Sahar Allen, Lillian Hung","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2507413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge translation and exchange to promote the health and well-being of older adults requires collaborative relationships between researchers and knowledge users. Students are uniquely positioned to engage with the community and bridge these science-practice gaps. In this paper, we highlight key lessons learned from our interdisciplinary and intergenerational team's critical reflections on our experiences and learnings bringing the LOVOT social robot to engagement sessions with older adults in our community. Our critical reflection process followed the reflection framework by Rolfe et al. (2001), guided by three questions: (1) \"What?\", (2) \"So what?,\" and (3) \"Now what?\" We conducted thematic analysis on our collective reflections. Three key learnings emerged from our critical reflections: (1) the values of meaningful interactions between older adults in our community and our team; (2) the diversity of backgrounds and perspectives of older adults in our community; and (3) factors that supported or challenged our community engagement sessions. We conclude with six recommendations for future student-led community engagement sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical reflection of an intergenerational, student-led team bringing social robots and research to older adults in the community.\",\"authors\":\"Hiro Ito, Helen Banh, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Lily Wong, Sahar Allen, Lillian Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2025.2507413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Knowledge translation and exchange to promote the health and well-being of older adults requires collaborative relationships between researchers and knowledge users. Students are uniquely positioned to engage with the community and bridge these science-practice gaps. In this paper, we highlight key lessons learned from our interdisciplinary and intergenerational team's critical reflections on our experiences and learnings bringing the LOVOT social robot to engagement sessions with older adults in our community. Our critical reflection process followed the reflection framework by Rolfe et al. (2001), guided by three questions: (1) \\\"What?\\\", (2) \\\"So what?,\\\" and (3) \\\"Now what?\\\" We conducted thematic analysis on our collective reflections. Three key learnings emerged from our critical reflections: (1) the values of meaningful interactions between older adults in our community and our team; (2) the diversity of backgrounds and perspectives of older adults in our community; and (3) factors that supported or challenged our community engagement sessions. We conclude with six recommendations for future student-led community engagement sessions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2507413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2507413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A critical reflection of an intergenerational, student-led team bringing social robots and research to older adults in the community.
Knowledge translation and exchange to promote the health and well-being of older adults requires collaborative relationships between researchers and knowledge users. Students are uniquely positioned to engage with the community and bridge these science-practice gaps. In this paper, we highlight key lessons learned from our interdisciplinary and intergenerational team's critical reflections on our experiences and learnings bringing the LOVOT social robot to engagement sessions with older adults in our community. Our critical reflection process followed the reflection framework by Rolfe et al. (2001), guided by three questions: (1) "What?", (2) "So what?," and (3) "Now what?" We conducted thematic analysis on our collective reflections. Three key learnings emerged from our critical reflections: (1) the values of meaningful interactions between older adults in our community and our team; (2) the diversity of backgrounds and perspectives of older adults in our community; and (3) factors that supported or challenged our community engagement sessions. We conclude with six recommendations for future student-led community engagement sessions.
期刊介绍:
Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.