人工智能生成的三维体成分预测直肠癌新辅助化疗患者的剂量变化。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Alex Besson, Ke Cao, Ahmed Mardinli, Lara Wirth, Josephine Yeung, Rory Kokelaar, Peter Gibbs, Fiona Reid, Justin M Yeung
{"title":"人工智能生成的三维体成分预测直肠癌新辅助化疗患者的剂量变化。","authors":"Alex Besson, Ke Cao, Ahmed Mardinli, Lara Wirth, Josephine Yeung, Rory Kokelaar, Peter Gibbs, Fiona Reid, Justin M Yeung","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06219-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy administration is a balancing act between giving enough to achieve the desired tumour response while limiting adverse effects. Chemotherapy dosing is based on body surface area (BSA). Emerging evidence suggests body composition plays a crucial role in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of cytotoxic agents and could inform optimal dosing. This study aims to assess how lumbosacral body composition influences adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study (February 2013 to March 2023) examined the impact of body composition on neoadjuvant treatment outcomes for rectal cancer patients. Staging CT scans were analysed using a validated AI model to measure lumbosacral skeletal muscle (SM), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue volume and density. Multivariate analyses explored the relationship between body composition and chemotherapy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>242 patients were included (164 males, 78 Females), median age 63.4 years. Chemotherapy dose reductions occurred more frequently in females (26.9% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.042) and in females with greater VAT density (-82.7 vs. -89.1, p = 0.007) and SM: IMAT + VAT volume ratio (1.99 vs. 1.36, p = 0.042). BSA was a poor predictor of dose reduction (AUC 0.397, sensitivity 38%, specificity 60%) for female patients, whereas the SM: IMAT + VAT volume ratio (AUC 0.651, sensitivity 76%, specificity 61%) and VAT density (AUC 0.699, sensitivity 57%, specificity 74%) showed greater predictive ability. Body composition didn't influence dose adjustment of male patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lumbosacral body composition outperformed BSA in predicting adverse events in female patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 5","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence generated 3D body composition predicts dose modifications in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Besson, Ke Cao, Ahmed Mardinli, Lara Wirth, Josephine Yeung, Rory Kokelaar, Peter Gibbs, Fiona Reid, Justin M Yeung\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06219-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy administration is a balancing act between giving enough to achieve the desired tumour response while limiting adverse effects. Chemotherapy dosing is based on body surface area (BSA). Emerging evidence suggests body composition plays a crucial role in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of cytotoxic agents and could inform optimal dosing. This study aims to assess how lumbosacral body composition influences adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study (February 2013 to March 2023) examined the impact of body composition on neoadjuvant treatment outcomes for rectal cancer patients. Staging CT scans were analysed using a validated AI model to measure lumbosacral skeletal muscle (SM), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue volume and density. Multivariate analyses explored the relationship between body composition and chemotherapy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>242 patients were included (164 males, 78 Females), median age 63.4 years. Chemotherapy dose reductions occurred more frequently in females (26.9% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.042) and in females with greater VAT density (-82.7 vs. -89.1, p = 0.007) and SM: IMAT + VAT volume ratio (1.99 vs. 1.36, p = 0.042). BSA was a poor predictor of dose reduction (AUC 0.397, sensitivity 38%, specificity 60%) for female patients, whereas the SM: IMAT + VAT volume ratio (AUC 0.651, sensitivity 76%, specificity 61%) and VAT density (AUC 0.699, sensitivity 57%, specificity 74%) showed greater predictive ability. Body composition didn't influence dose adjustment of male patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lumbosacral body composition outperformed BSA in predicting adverse events in female patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 5\",\"pages\":\"168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084224/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06219-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06219-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:化疗给药是一个平衡的行为,给予足够的,以达到预期的肿瘤反应和限制不良反应。化疗剂量是基于体表面积(BSA)。越来越多的证据表明,身体成分在细胞毒性药物的药代动力学和药效学特征中起着至关重要的作用,并可能决定最佳剂量。本研究旨在评估腰骶体成分对直肠癌新辅助化疗患者不良事件的影响。方法:一项回顾性研究(2013年2月至2023年3月)研究了身体成分对直肠癌患者新辅助治疗结果的影响。使用经过验证的AI模型对分期CT扫描进行分析,以测量腰骶骨骼肌(SM)、肌内脂肪组织(IMAT)、内脏脂肪组织(VAT)和皮下脂肪组织的体积和密度。多变量分析探讨了身体成分与化疗结果之间的关系。结果:纳入242例患者(男164例,女78例),中位年龄63.4岁。化疗剂量减少在女性(26.9% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.042)、VAT密度较大的女性(-82.7 vs. -89.1, p = 0.007)和SM: IMAT + VAT体积比(1.99 vs. 1.36, p = 0.042)中发生的频率更高。对于女性患者,BSA对剂量减少的预测能力较差(AUC 0.397,敏感性38%,特异性60%),而SM: IMAT + VAT体积比(AUC 0.651,敏感性76%,特异性61%)和VAT密度(AUC 0.699,敏感性57%,特异性74%)的预测能力较强。男性患者体成分对剂量调整无影响。结论:腰骶体成分在预测女性直肠癌新辅助化疗不良事件方面优于BSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence generated 3D body composition predicts dose modifications in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Purpose: Chemotherapy administration is a balancing act between giving enough to achieve the desired tumour response while limiting adverse effects. Chemotherapy dosing is based on body surface area (BSA). Emerging evidence suggests body composition plays a crucial role in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of cytotoxic agents and could inform optimal dosing. This study aims to assess how lumbosacral body composition influences adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Methods: A retrospective study (February 2013 to March 2023) examined the impact of body composition on neoadjuvant treatment outcomes for rectal cancer patients. Staging CT scans were analysed using a validated AI model to measure lumbosacral skeletal muscle (SM), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue volume and density. Multivariate analyses explored the relationship between body composition and chemotherapy outcomes.

Results: 242 patients were included (164 males, 78 Females), median age 63.4 years. Chemotherapy dose reductions occurred more frequently in females (26.9% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.042) and in females with greater VAT density (-82.7 vs. -89.1, p = 0.007) and SM: IMAT + VAT volume ratio (1.99 vs. 1.36, p = 0.042). BSA was a poor predictor of dose reduction (AUC 0.397, sensitivity 38%, specificity 60%) for female patients, whereas the SM: IMAT + VAT volume ratio (AUC 0.651, sensitivity 76%, specificity 61%) and VAT density (AUC 0.699, sensitivity 57%, specificity 74%) showed greater predictive ability. Body composition didn't influence dose adjustment of male patients.

Conclusion: Lumbosacral body composition outperformed BSA in predicting adverse events in female patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信