基于应用程序的生物电阻抗分析以更具成本效益和时间效率的方式提供准确的身体成分参数。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Giovanna D'Abbronzo, Giuseppe Scidà, Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale
{"title":"基于应用程序的生物电阻抗分析以更具成本效益和时间效率的方式提供准确的身体成分参数。","authors":"Giovanna D'Abbronzo, Giuseppe Scidà, Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an app-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared to a standard BIA method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18 to 70 years, with a BMI of 25.0-35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and glycated hemoglobin levels of 7.0-9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the app-based BIA system or the standard method (A-Wave BIA Quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison between the two methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (-4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance (ICC=0.990, p<0.001) and reactance (ICC=0.903, p<0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and non-significant differences between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the app-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"App-based bioelectrical impedance analysis provides accurate body composition parameters in a more cost-efficient and time-efficient way.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna D'Abbronzo, Giuseppe Scidà, Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an app-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared to a standard BIA method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18 to 70 years, with a BMI of 25.0-35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and glycated hemoglobin levels of 7.0-9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the app-based BIA system or the standard method (A-Wave BIA Quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison between the two methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (-4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance (ICC=0.990, p<0.001) and reactance (ICC=0.903, p<0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and non-significant differences between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the app-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床实践中,越来越多的方法需要提供准确、精确和实时的身体成分测量,同时降低成本和数据收集时间。目的:本研究旨在评价基于app的生物电阻抗分析(BIA)系统测定人体成分的有效性,并与标准BIA方法进行比较。方法:共招募109例1型糖尿病患者(男性56例,女性53例),年龄18 ~ 70岁,BMI为25.0 ~ 35.0 kg/m2,糖化血红蛋白水平为7.0 ~ 9.0%。参与者被随机分配使用基于应用程序的BIA系统或标准方法(A-Wave BIA Quantum-V),然后切换到另一种方法。还评估了人体测量参数、血压和代谢谱。结果:两种方法比较,电阻差异可忽略不计,但电抗差异显著(-4.9%)。结论:基于应用程序的BIA系统是一种有效可靠的评估身体成分的工具,为包括营养师和营养学家在内的医疗保健专业人员提供了一种具有成本效益和时间效率的替代标准BIA方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
App-based bioelectrical impedance analysis provides accurate body composition parameters in a more cost-efficient and time-efficient way.

Background: In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an app-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared to a standard BIA method.

Methods: A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18 to 70 years, with a BMI of 25.0-35.0 kg/m2 and glycated hemoglobin levels of 7.0-9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the app-based BIA system or the standard method (A-Wave BIA Quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.

Results: The comparison between the two methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (-4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance (ICC=0.990, p<0.001) and reactance (ICC=0.903, p<0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and non-significant differences between the two methods.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the app-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信