Giovanna D'Abbronzo, Giuseppe Scidà, Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale
{"title":"基于应用程序的生物电阻抗分析以更具成本效益和时间效率的方式提供准确的身体成分参数。","authors":"Giovanna D'Abbronzo, Giuseppe Scidà, Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an app-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared to a standard BIA method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18 to 70 years, with a BMI of 25.0-35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and glycated hemoglobin levels of 7.0-9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the app-based BIA system or the standard method (A-Wave BIA Quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison between the two methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (-4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance (ICC=0.990, p<0.001) and reactance (ICC=0.903, p<0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and non-significant differences between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the app-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"App-based bioelectrical impedance analysis provides accurate body composition parameters in a more cost-efficient and time-efficient way.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna D'Abbronzo, Giuseppe Scidà, Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an app-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared to a standard BIA method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18 to 70 years, with a BMI of 25.0-35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and glycated hemoglobin levels of 7.0-9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the app-based BIA system or the standard method (A-Wave BIA Quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison between the two methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (-4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance (ICC=0.990, p<0.001) and reactance (ICC=0.903, p<0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and non-significant differences between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the app-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
App-based bioelectrical impedance analysis provides accurate body composition parameters in a more cost-efficient and time-efficient way.
Background: In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an app-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared to a standard BIA method.
Methods: A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18 to 70 years, with a BMI of 25.0-35.0 kg/m2 and glycated hemoglobin levels of 7.0-9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the app-based BIA system or the standard method (A-Wave BIA Quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.
Results: The comparison between the two methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (-4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance (ICC=0.990, p<0.001) and reactance (ICC=0.903, p<0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and non-significant differences between the two methods.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that the app-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.