马来西亚视力残疾评估问卷的验证及其在评估马来西亚三级医疗中心白内障患者功能残疾中的应用。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yi Wen Lim, Nor Fadhilah Mohamad, Foong Ming Moy, Tengku Ain Kamalden
{"title":"马来西亚视力残疾评估问卷的验证及其在评估马来西亚三级医疗中心白内障患者功能残疾中的应用。","authors":"Yi Wen Lim, Nor Fadhilah Mohamad, Foong Ming Moy, Tengku Ain Kamalden","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03552-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Malay-Visual Disability Assessment (VDA) questionnaire and to assess its applicability in evaluating functional disability among cataract patients of a tertiary medical centre in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was divided into two phases. In Phase I, the pre-final version of Malay-VDA was validated by a panel of six experts, followed by cognitive debriefing with 10 respondents. Test-retest reliability was assessed using 35 participants. The reliability and validity of the Malay-VDA was tested using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and content validity index (CVI). Phase II evaluated the visual function among 200 cataract patients using the validated Malay-VDA. Additionally, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic data of the respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase I, all items in Malay-VDA achieved an item-level CVI of > 0.8 for relevance and > 0.7 for clarity, with an overall CVI > 0.9. The test-retest reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability, with a single measures ICC of 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995-0.999, p < 0.001) and an average measures ICC of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998-0.999, p < 0.001). In Phase II, out of the 200 respondents, they were more Chinese, females, had completed primary education and aged between 70 to 79 years. The respondents had higher VDA scores in distance domain with the mean (SD) scores of 16.57 (5.11), showing worst functional disability in distant activities, followed by difficulties in the mobility domain (mean (SD) scores of 10.15 (3.72)) and near domain (mean (SD) scores of 9.98 (2.76)). The mean score was found to be significantly higher in the poor vision group for all three domains. A positive correlation with moderate strength was found between total VDA score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with age adjusted (r = 0.575, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Malay-VDA demonstrated good reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for local adaptation. This study highlighted that visual function was not solely determined by visual acuity, underscoring the importance of comprehensive functional assessment in cataract patients. Therefore, integrating visual function assessment into preoperative evaluations could enhance surgical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Malay-vision disability assessment (VDA) questionnaire and its application to assess the functional disability among cataract patients of a tertiary medical centre in Malaysia.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Wen Lim, Nor Fadhilah Mohamad, Foong Ming Moy, Tengku Ain Kamalden\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10792-025-03552-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Malay-Visual Disability Assessment (VDA) questionnaire and to assess its applicability in evaluating functional disability among cataract patients of a tertiary medical centre in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was divided into two phases. In Phase I, the pre-final version of Malay-VDA was validated by a panel of six experts, followed by cognitive debriefing with 10 respondents. Test-retest reliability was assessed using 35 participants. The reliability and validity of the Malay-VDA was tested using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and content validity index (CVI). Phase II evaluated the visual function among 200 cataract patients using the validated Malay-VDA. Additionally, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic data of the respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase I, all items in Malay-VDA achieved an item-level CVI of > 0.8 for relevance and > 0.7 for clarity, with an overall CVI > 0.9. The test-retest reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability, with a single measures ICC of 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995-0.999, p < 0.001) and an average measures ICC of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998-0.999, p < 0.001). In Phase II, out of the 200 respondents, they were more Chinese, females, had completed primary education and aged between 70 to 79 years. The respondents had higher VDA scores in distance domain with the mean (SD) scores of 16.57 (5.11), showing worst functional disability in distant activities, followed by difficulties in the mobility domain (mean (SD) scores of 10.15 (3.72)) and near domain (mean (SD) scores of 9.98 (2.76)). The mean score was found to be significantly higher in the poor vision group for all three domains. A positive correlation with moderate strength was found between total VDA score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with age adjusted (r = 0.575, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Malay-VDA demonstrated good reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for local adaptation. This study highlighted that visual function was not solely determined by visual acuity, underscoring the importance of comprehensive functional assessment in cataract patients. Therefore, integrating visual function assessment into preoperative evaluations could enhance surgical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03552-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03552-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在翻译、文化适应和验证马来视觉残疾评估(VDA)问卷,并评估其在评估马来西亚三级医疗中心白内障患者功能残疾中的适用性。方法:本研究以问卷调查为基础,分为两个阶段。在第一阶段,马来语- vda的预定稿版本由六名专家组成的小组进行验证,然后对10名受访者进行认知汇报。使用35名参与者评估重测信度。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和内容效度指数(CVI)对马来语- vda进行信度和效度检验。第二阶段使用经过验证的马来- vda评估200例白内障患者的视力功能。此外,采用自填问卷收集调查对象的社会人口学资料。结果:在第一阶段,马来- vda的所有项目都达到了>.8的相关性和> 0.7的清晰度的项目级CVI,总体CVI > 0.9。测试-重测信度分析显示了良好的信度,单测量ICC为0.998 (95% CI: 0.995 ~ 0.999, p)。结论:马来语- vda具有良好的信度和效度,是一种适合于局部适应的工具。本研究强调了视功能并非仅由视力决定,强调了对白内障患者进行综合功能评估的重要性。因此,将视功能评估纳入术前评估可以提高手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Malay-vision disability assessment (VDA) questionnaire and its application to assess the functional disability among cataract patients of a tertiary medical centre in Malaysia.

Purpose: This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Malay-Visual Disability Assessment (VDA) questionnaire and to assess its applicability in evaluating functional disability among cataract patients of a tertiary medical centre in Malaysia.

Methods: This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was divided into two phases. In Phase I, the pre-final version of Malay-VDA was validated by a panel of six experts, followed by cognitive debriefing with 10 respondents. Test-retest reliability was assessed using 35 participants. The reliability and validity of the Malay-VDA was tested using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and content validity index (CVI). Phase II evaluated the visual function among 200 cataract patients using the validated Malay-VDA. Additionally, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic data of the respondents.

Results: In Phase I, all items in Malay-VDA achieved an item-level CVI of > 0.8 for relevance and > 0.7 for clarity, with an overall CVI > 0.9. The test-retest reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability, with a single measures ICC of 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995-0.999, p < 0.001) and an average measures ICC of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998-0.999, p < 0.001). In Phase II, out of the 200 respondents, they were more Chinese, females, had completed primary education and aged between 70 to 79 years. The respondents had higher VDA scores in distance domain with the mean (SD) scores of 16.57 (5.11), showing worst functional disability in distant activities, followed by difficulties in the mobility domain (mean (SD) scores of 10.15 (3.72)) and near domain (mean (SD) scores of 9.98 (2.76)). The mean score was found to be significantly higher in the poor vision group for all three domains. A positive correlation with moderate strength was found between total VDA score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with age adjusted (r = 0.575, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Malay-VDA demonstrated good reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for local adaptation. This study highlighted that visual function was not solely determined by visual acuity, underscoring the importance of comprehensive functional assessment in cataract patients. Therefore, integrating visual function assessment into preoperative evaluations could enhance surgical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信