George Lin, Tracy Kuo Lin, Mohammed Alluhidan, Rana Saber, Mariam M Hamza, Severin Rakic, Abdulrahman Alfaisal, Adwaa Alamri, Volkan Cetinkaya, Nahar Alazmi
{"title":"建立一个综合的痴呆症医疗保健系统的证据:一个系统的回顾。","authors":"George Lin, Tracy Kuo Lin, Mohammed Alluhidan, Rana Saber, Mariam M Hamza, Severin Rakic, Abdulrahman Alfaisal, Adwaa Alamri, Volkan Cetinkaya, Nahar Alazmi","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2505577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Proponents of integrated healthcare systems suggest that such system can improve healthcare experience for individuals with dementia by amalgamating personal and structured resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed systematically available evidence on the current state of integrated healthcare systems viewed in terms of different levels and dimensions of integration, emphasizing multiple stakeholders' simultaneous perspectives. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they (1) evaluated a health system, (2) adopted a network or integrated care model, (3) cared for individuals with dementia, and (4) provided real-world data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review included 31 studies. Main components of the healthcare system included care mediation, multidisciplinary care, primary care integration, long-term care, community-based service, digital technology, and one undefined. Most studies involved meso-level integration (<i>n</i> = 23), followed by micro-level (<i>n</i> = 12) and macro-level integration (<i>n</i> = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key factors that promote an integrated healthcare system for dementia include supportive organizational structure, multidisciplinary collaboration, effective leadership, clear roles, streamlined referral, and community involvement. Macro-level integration should be considered with greater emphasis in conjunction with both meso- and micro-level integration.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Successful development of comprehensive integrated healthcare network will require thoughtful implementation and transition across all levels of the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for Building an Integrated Dementia Healthcare System: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"George Lin, Tracy Kuo Lin, Mohammed Alluhidan, Rana Saber, Mariam M Hamza, Severin Rakic, Abdulrahman Alfaisal, Adwaa Alamri, Volkan Cetinkaya, Nahar Alazmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317115.2025.2505577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Proponents of integrated healthcare systems suggest that such system can improve healthcare experience for individuals with dementia by amalgamating personal and structured resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed systematically available evidence on the current state of integrated healthcare systems viewed in terms of different levels and dimensions of integration, emphasizing multiple stakeholders' simultaneous perspectives. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they (1) evaluated a health system, (2) adopted a network or integrated care model, (3) cared for individuals with dementia, and (4) provided real-world data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review included 31 studies. Main components of the healthcare system included care mediation, multidisciplinary care, primary care integration, long-term care, community-based service, digital technology, and one undefined. Most studies involved meso-level integration (<i>n</i> = 23), followed by micro-level (<i>n</i> = 12) and macro-level integration (<i>n</i> = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key factors that promote an integrated healthcare system for dementia include supportive organizational structure, multidisciplinary collaboration, effective leadership, clear roles, streamlined referral, and community involvement. Macro-level integration should be considered with greater emphasis in conjunction with both meso- and micro-level integration.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Successful development of comprehensive integrated healthcare network will require thoughtful implementation and transition across all levels of the system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2505577\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2505577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence for Building an Integrated Dementia Healthcare System: A Systematic Review.
Objectives: Proponents of integrated healthcare systems suggest that such system can improve healthcare experience for individuals with dementia by amalgamating personal and structured resources.
Methods: We assessed systematically available evidence on the current state of integrated healthcare systems viewed in terms of different levels and dimensions of integration, emphasizing multiple stakeholders' simultaneous perspectives. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they (1) evaluated a health system, (2) adopted a network or integrated care model, (3) cared for individuals with dementia, and (4) provided real-world data.
Results: Our review included 31 studies. Main components of the healthcare system included care mediation, multidisciplinary care, primary care integration, long-term care, community-based service, digital technology, and one undefined. Most studies involved meso-level integration (n = 23), followed by micro-level (n = 12) and macro-level integration (n = 5).
Conclusions: Key factors that promote an integrated healthcare system for dementia include supportive organizational structure, multidisciplinary collaboration, effective leadership, clear roles, streamlined referral, and community involvement. Macro-level integration should be considered with greater emphasis in conjunction with both meso- and micro-level integration.
Clinical implications: Successful development of comprehensive integrated healthcare network will require thoughtful implementation and transition across all levels of the system.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including:
-adjustments to changing roles-
issues related to diversity and aging-
family caregiving-
spirituality-
cognitive and psychosocial assessment-
depression, anxiety, and PTSD-
Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders-
long term care-
behavioral medicine in aging-
rehabilitation and education for older adults.
Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.