津巴布韦青年对艾滋病毒预防干预措施的认识、获取和吸收:一项基于人口的调查。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sophie H Kelly, Steven Azizi, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Mandikudza Tembo, Tsitsi Bandason, Ethel Dauya, Constancia V Mavodza, Tsitsi Apollo, Owen Mugurungi, Rashida A Ferrand, Victoria Simms
{"title":"津巴布韦青年对艾滋病毒预防干预措施的认识、获取和吸收:一项基于人口的调查。","authors":"Sophie H Kelly, Steven Azizi, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Mandikudza Tembo, Tsitsi Bandason, Ethel Dauya, Constancia V Mavodza, Tsitsi Apollo, Owen Mugurungi, Rashida A Ferrand, Victoria Simms","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11076-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth in southern Africa continue to be at high risk of HIV infection. We investigated the awareness of, access to, and uptake of HIV prevention interventions (pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), voluntary medical male circumcision and condoms) among youth in Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based survey of youth aged 18-24 years in 24 communities across three provinces was conducted between October 2021 and June 2022. An interviewer-administered questionnaire collected sociodemographic and sexual behaviour data including awareness of, access to, and use of HIV preventative interventions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effects logistic regression weighted for clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 17,682 youth (60.8% female, median age 20 years (Interquartile range 19-22)). Altogether 46.8% (n = 3634) of unmarried youth and 5.6% (n = 3538) of married youth reported consistent condom use and 49.8% (n = 3369) of men reported being circumcised. Awareness of PrEP and PEP was 11.2% and 11.9% respectively. 6900 participants (38.4%) reported at least one eligibility criterion for PrEP. Eligibiltiy criteria included having multiple partners or receiving money or goods for sex in the last year, HIV-negative individuals in serodiscordant relationships, those who had ever been treated for an STI, ever injected drugs, been pregnant or taken PEP. In comparison to the non-eligible population (n = 10782), the eligible population were more likely to have heard of PrEP (13.5% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001), been offered PrEP if they had heard of it (17.0% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and to have ever taken PrEP if offered it (60.7% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001). Those in the richest wealth quintiles and with higher education level were more likely to have heard of PrEP and report regular condom use. Forty-two of 199 (20.2%) who reported having experienced forced sex in the last year sought healthcare afterwards, of these 17 of 42 (36.0%) had been offered PEP and 12 of 17 (63.7%) had ever taken it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of HIV preventive interventions remains limited among youth despite longstanding HIV programmes. Lack of awareness limits use of PrEP and PEP. There are underlying socioeconomic barriers limiting awareness of and demand for condoms, circumcision and pharmacological prophylaxis. These must be urgently addressed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03719521.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awareness, access to and uptake of HIV prevention interventions among youth in Zimbabwe: a population-based survey.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie H Kelly, Steven Azizi, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Mandikudza Tembo, Tsitsi Bandason, Ethel Dauya, Constancia V Mavodza, Tsitsi Apollo, Owen Mugurungi, Rashida A Ferrand, Victoria Simms\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-025-11076-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth in southern Africa continue to be at high risk of HIV infection. We investigated the awareness of, access to, and uptake of HIV prevention interventions (pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), voluntary medical male circumcision and condoms) among youth in Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based survey of youth aged 18-24 years in 24 communities across three provinces was conducted between October 2021 and June 2022. An interviewer-administered questionnaire collected sociodemographic and sexual behaviour data including awareness of, access to, and use of HIV preventative interventions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effects logistic regression weighted for clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 17,682 youth (60.8% female, median age 20 years (Interquartile range 19-22)). Altogether 46.8% (n = 3634) of unmarried youth and 5.6% (n = 3538) of married youth reported consistent condom use and 49.8% (n = 3369) of men reported being circumcised. Awareness of PrEP and PEP was 11.2% and 11.9% respectively. 6900 participants (38.4%) reported at least one eligibility criterion for PrEP. Eligibiltiy criteria included having multiple partners or receiving money or goods for sex in the last year, HIV-negative individuals in serodiscordant relationships, those who had ever been treated for an STI, ever injected drugs, been pregnant or taken PEP. In comparison to the non-eligible population (n = 10782), the eligible population were more likely to have heard of PrEP (13.5% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001), been offered PrEP if they had heard of it (17.0% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and to have ever taken PrEP if offered it (60.7% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001). Those in the richest wealth quintiles and with higher education level were more likely to have heard of PrEP and report regular condom use. Forty-two of 199 (20.2%) who reported having experienced forced sex in the last year sought healthcare afterwards, of these 17 of 42 (36.0%) had been offered PEP and 12 of 17 (63.7%) had ever taken it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of HIV preventive interventions remains limited among youth despite longstanding HIV programmes. Lack of awareness limits use of PrEP and PEP. There are underlying socioeconomic barriers limiting awareness of and demand for condoms, circumcision and pharmacological prophylaxis. These must be urgently addressed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03719521.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083137/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11076-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11076-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:南部非洲的青年仍然是艾滋病毒感染的高危人群。我们调查了津巴布韦青年对艾滋病毒预防干预措施(暴露前预防(PrEP)、暴露后预防(PEP)、自愿医疗男性包皮环切术和避孕套)的认识、获取和吸收情况。方法:在2021年10月至2022年6月期间,对三省24个社区的18-24岁青年进行了人口调查。一份由访谈者填写的问卷收集了社会人口学和性行为数据,包括对艾滋病毒预防干预措施的认识、获取和使用情况。数据分析采用描述性统计和混合效应逻辑回归加权聚类。结果:我们招募了17,682名青年(60.8%为女性,中位年龄20岁(四分位数范围19-22))。共有46.8% (n = 3634)的未婚青年和5.6% (n = 3538)的已婚青年报告坚持使用避孕套,49.8% (n = 3369)的男性报告做过包皮环切手术。PrEP和PEP知晓率分别为11.2%和11.9%。6900名参与者(38.4%)报告了至少一项PrEP的资格标准。合格标准包括有多个伴侣或在过去一年中接受金钱或物品的性行为,艾滋病毒阴性的人在血清不一致的关系中,曾经接受过性传播感染治疗的人,曾经注射过毒品,怀孕或服用过PEP。与非合格人群(n = 10782)相比,合格人群更有可能听说过PrEP (13.5% vs. 9.9%)。结论:尽管长期存在艾滋病毒规划,但青少年对艾滋病毒预防干预措施的使用仍然有限。缺乏认识限制了PrEP和PEP的使用。潜在的社会经济障碍限制了人们对避孕套、包皮环切术和药物预防的认识和需求。这些问题必须紧急处理。试验注册号:NCT03719521。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Awareness, access to and uptake of HIV prevention interventions among youth in Zimbabwe: a population-based survey.

Background: Youth in southern Africa continue to be at high risk of HIV infection. We investigated the awareness of, access to, and uptake of HIV prevention interventions (pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), voluntary medical male circumcision and condoms) among youth in Zimbabwe.

Methods: A population-based survey of youth aged 18-24 years in 24 communities across three provinces was conducted between October 2021 and June 2022. An interviewer-administered questionnaire collected sociodemographic and sexual behaviour data including awareness of, access to, and use of HIV preventative interventions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effects logistic regression weighted for clustering.

Results: We recruited 17,682 youth (60.8% female, median age 20 years (Interquartile range 19-22)). Altogether 46.8% (n = 3634) of unmarried youth and 5.6% (n = 3538) of married youth reported consistent condom use and 49.8% (n = 3369) of men reported being circumcised. Awareness of PrEP and PEP was 11.2% and 11.9% respectively. 6900 participants (38.4%) reported at least one eligibility criterion for PrEP. Eligibiltiy criteria included having multiple partners or receiving money or goods for sex in the last year, HIV-negative individuals in serodiscordant relationships, those who had ever been treated for an STI, ever injected drugs, been pregnant or taken PEP. In comparison to the non-eligible population (n = 10782), the eligible population were more likely to have heard of PrEP (13.5% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001), been offered PrEP if they had heard of it (17.0% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and to have ever taken PrEP if offered it (60.7% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001). Those in the richest wealth quintiles and with higher education level were more likely to have heard of PrEP and report regular condom use. Forty-two of 199 (20.2%) who reported having experienced forced sex in the last year sought healthcare afterwards, of these 17 of 42 (36.0%) had been offered PEP and 12 of 17 (63.7%) had ever taken it.

Conclusions: Use of HIV preventive interventions remains limited among youth despite longstanding HIV programmes. Lack of awareness limits use of PrEP and PEP. There are underlying socioeconomic barriers limiting awareness of and demand for condoms, circumcision and pharmacological prophylaxis. These must be urgently addressed.

Trial registration number: NCT03719521.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信