Cost-effectiveness of school integrated pest management and air filtration in students with asthma.

Background: The cost-effectiveness of school environmental remediation in asthma is not known. The School Inner City Asthma Intervention Study (SICAS2) was a randomized controlled trial that assessed school integrated pest management (IPM) and classroom high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration on asthma morbidity in urban schools. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SICAS2. Methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective that compared four interventions: IPM, HEPA, IPM + HEPA, and no intervention. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were derived from the EuroQol-5 Dimension-Youth and EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 levels instruments. Total costs (2021 U.S. dollars) included intervention cost, cost of caregiver productivity impacted by child school absenteeism, and health-care utilization costs (e.g., emergency department visits). The evaluation period was based on a mean follow-up time of 166 days. Sensitivity analyses were performed by using cost estimates 50% above and below initial cost benchmarks. Results: A total of 154 SICAS2 participants were included. Intervention costs per student were $12.21 (IPM + HEPA), $7.27 (IPM), and $4.94 (HEPA). Sequential analyses revealed that IPM + HEPA was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $19,667 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated stability, with variability in probability estimates not exceeding 10%. Conclusion: IPM + HEPA demonstrated good value to society, which reflected the low cost and the economic impact of missed school days. This intervention may have a pronounced benefit for historically minoritized and marginalized children in urban schools who are disproportionately exposed to air pollution and indoor allergens. The SICAS2 intervention may offer a cost-effective tool to target proximal causes of disparities even in the most resource-limited schools.