Ayse Yildiz, Ramazan Yildiz, Umut Apaydin, Pelin Atalan Efkere, Rabia Zorlular, Bulent Elbasan
{"title":"早期自发运动对12个月矫正年龄早产儿神经发育结局的预测价值","authors":"Ayse Yildiz, Ramazan Yildiz, Umut Apaydin, Pelin Atalan Efkere, Rabia Zorlular, Bulent Elbasan","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Motor, cognitive, behavioral, and sensory problems may be seen in preterm infants. Early spontaneous movements' role in these developmental areas has yet to be sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) in predicting motor, cognitive, language, and sensory developmental outcomes in premature infants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty preterm children were examined. Early spontaneous movements were evaluated using the General Movement Assessment (GMA), which detects the MOS-R. Infants' language, cognitive, and motor development were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Sensory development was evaluated using the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean score for the MOS-R was 23.13 ± 4.6. Most infants (<i>n</i> = 31, 77.5%) showed typical fidgety movements. The sensitivity of the MOS-R for determining motor, cognitive, and language development at 12 corrected months was 86.7%, 80%, and 82%, respectively, and the specificity was 71.4%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. MOS-R scores did not predict sensory development outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05)</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>At three months, the MOS-R demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting motor, cognitive, and language functions in preterm infants at 12 months corrected age.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70562","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Value of the Early Spontaneous Movements for Preterm Infants’ Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 12 Months’ Corrected Age\",\"authors\":\"Ayse Yildiz, Ramazan Yildiz, Umut Apaydin, Pelin Atalan Efkere, Rabia Zorlular, Bulent Elbasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Motor, cognitive, behavioral, and sensory problems may be seen in preterm infants. Early spontaneous movements' role in these developmental areas has yet to be sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) in predicting motor, cognitive, language, and sensory developmental outcomes in premature infants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty preterm children were examined. Early spontaneous movements were evaluated using the General Movement Assessment (GMA), which detects the MOS-R. Infants' language, cognitive, and motor development were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Sensory development was evaluated using the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The mean score for the MOS-R was 23.13 ± 4.6. Most infants (<i>n</i> = 31, 77.5%) showed typical fidgety movements. The sensitivity of the MOS-R for determining motor, cognitive, and language development at 12 corrected months was 86.7%, 80%, and 82%, respectively, and the specificity was 71.4%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. MOS-R scores did not predict sensory development outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05)</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>At three months, the MOS-R demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting motor, cognitive, and language functions in preterm infants at 12 months corrected age.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70562\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive Value of the Early Spontaneous Movements for Preterm Infants’ Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 12 Months’ Corrected Age
Purpose
Motor, cognitive, behavioral, and sensory problems may be seen in preterm infants. Early spontaneous movements' role in these developmental areas has yet to be sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) in predicting motor, cognitive, language, and sensory developmental outcomes in premature infants.
Methods
Forty preterm children were examined. Early spontaneous movements were evaluated using the General Movement Assessment (GMA), which detects the MOS-R. Infants' language, cognitive, and motor development were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Sensory development was evaluated using the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI).
Results
The mean score for the MOS-R was 23.13 ± 4.6. Most infants (n = 31, 77.5%) showed typical fidgety movements. The sensitivity of the MOS-R for determining motor, cognitive, and language development at 12 corrected months was 86.7%, 80%, and 82%, respectively, and the specificity was 71.4%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. MOS-R scores did not predict sensory development outcomes (p > 0.05)
Conclusions
At three months, the MOS-R demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting motor, cognitive, and language functions in preterm infants at 12 months corrected age.
期刊介绍:
Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior.
* [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica)
* [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology)
* [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior)
* [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology)
* [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development)
* [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health)
* [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety)
* Developmental Neurobiology
* [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science)
* [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience)
* [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior)
* [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia)
* [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus)
* [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping)
* [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour)
* [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology)
* [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging)
* [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research)
* [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior)
* [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system)
* [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve)
* [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)