Aysun Parlak Kocabay, Aysegul Esdogan, Aysenur Aykul Yagcioglu
{"title":"声反射测量的视觉调制：对感觉整合的见解","authors":"Aysun Parlak Kocabay, Aysegul Esdogan, Aysenur Aykul Yagcioglu","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim was to investigate the impact of visual tasks on acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs) and AR latencies (ARLs) during AR measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 31 participants (17 female, 14 male; mean age: 20.3 ± 1.8 years) with normal hearing and Type A tympanograms were included. ARTs and latencies were measured using a 226 Hz probe tone under five distinct conditions: (1) resting with no visual task, (2) eyes comfortably closed, (3) fixed gaze on a stationary object, (4) saccadic eye movements, and (5) optokinetic eye movements. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction applied for post hoc comparisons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ARTs were significantly lower in the condition of eyes closed compared to fixed gaze, at both 1 and 2 kHz (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ARLs at 500 Hz were significantly shorter in the condition of fixed gaze compared to saccadic eye movements (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A significant interaction between frequency and condition was observed for ARTs, indicating frequency-specific modulation by visual tasks, whereas no significant frequency and condition interaction was found for ARLs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Visual tasks have a measurable effect on ARTs and latencies, likely due to cross-modal interactions between the auditory and visual systems. These results highlight the importance of standardizing visual and attentional conditions during clinical AR testing. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms and their clinical implications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual Modulation of Acoustic Reflex Measurements: Insights Into Sensory Integration\",\"authors\":\"Aysun Parlak Kocabay, Aysegul Esdogan, Aysenur Aykul Yagcioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim was to investigate the impact of visual tasks on acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs) and AR latencies (ARLs) during AR measurements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 31 participants (17 female, 14 male; mean age: 20.3 ± 1.8 years) with normal hearing and Type A tympanograms were included. ARTs and latencies were measured using a 226 Hz probe tone under five distinct conditions: (1) resting with no visual task, (2) eyes comfortably closed, (3) fixed gaze on a stationary object, (4) saccadic eye movements, and (5) optokinetic eye movements. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction applied for post hoc comparisons.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>ARTs were significantly lower in the condition of eyes closed compared to fixed gaze, at both 1 and 2 kHz (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ARLs at 500 Hz were significantly shorter in the condition of fixed gaze compared to saccadic eye movements (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A significant interaction between frequency and condition was observed for ARTs, indicating frequency-specific modulation by visual tasks, whereas no significant frequency and condition interaction was found for ARLs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Visual tasks have a measurable effect on ARTs and latencies, likely due to cross-modal interactions between the auditory and visual systems. These results highlight the importance of standardizing visual and attentional conditions during clinical AR testing. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms and their clinical implications.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70574\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70574\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visual Modulation of Acoustic Reflex Measurements: Insights Into Sensory Integration
Objective
The aim was to investigate the impact of visual tasks on acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs) and AR latencies (ARLs) during AR measurements.
Methods
A total of 31 participants (17 female, 14 male; mean age: 20.3 ± 1.8 years) with normal hearing and Type A tympanograms were included. ARTs and latencies were measured using a 226 Hz probe tone under five distinct conditions: (1) resting with no visual task, (2) eyes comfortably closed, (3) fixed gaze on a stationary object, (4) saccadic eye movements, and (5) optokinetic eye movements. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction applied for post hoc comparisons.
Results
ARTs were significantly lower in the condition of eyes closed compared to fixed gaze, at both 1 and 2 kHz (p < 0.05). ARLs at 500 Hz were significantly shorter in the condition of fixed gaze compared to saccadic eye movements (p < 0.05). A significant interaction between frequency and condition was observed for ARTs, indicating frequency-specific modulation by visual tasks, whereas no significant frequency and condition interaction was found for ARLs.
Conclusion
Visual tasks have a measurable effect on ARTs and latencies, likely due to cross-modal interactions between the auditory and visual systems. These results highlight the importance of standardizing visual and attentional conditions during clinical AR testing. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms and their clinical implications.
期刊介绍：
Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior.
* [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica)
* [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology)
* [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior)
* [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology)
* [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development)
* [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health)
* [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety)
* Developmental Neurobiology
* [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science)
* [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience)
* [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior)
* [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia)
* [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus)
* [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping)
* [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour)
* [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology)
* [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging)
* [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research)
* [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior)
* [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system)
* [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve)
* [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
